Andysquestions Posted February 24 Posted February 24 While I’ve experienced great one hour sessions, I often wonder if I should do two one hour sessions with different providers, or one two hour session with one provider for the same price. I ask because I see so many guys hiring for 2, 3, 4+ hours. I’m neither in a rush nor a minute man, and I’m not a penny pincher. But with my budget, I can’t just hire endlessly. What do you prefer and why?
56harrisond Posted February 24 Posted February 24 A minimum of two hours, one hour always seems too rushed. I've been doing more overnights and an occasional weekend. FaustOust, + Pensant, Andysquestions and 3 others 6
mike carey Posted February 24 Posted February 24 My idea for any hire is at least two hours as one seems too rushed especially if there's a 'getting to know you' element to the session. Usually works, although there have been occasions where the escort didn't notice, or ignored my request for two, and wound the session up after one. I have been grateful for some of those misunderstandings. For some, the second hour became a chore. In subsequent meetings, two, maybe three hours or an overnight when I know them better. There is really no right or wrong answer. Some appointments work, regardless of length, others don't. You won't know until you meet your man. If one hour turns out to be the right answer for a particular escort, I would tend not to repeat, but that's me. I don't hire frequently, and I can and so I can afford to have a longer session, they can be more relaxed and varied. + ApexNomad, FaustOust, + DrownedBoy and 4 others 5 2
+ Pensant Posted February 24 Posted February 24 I always do two hours; but lately I’m considering a one-hour for a new provider with the option of two if it turns out that the chemistry is good. + nycman, Yukon21, Occasional and 4 others 4 3
Thelatin Posted February 24 Posted February 24 If they are open to it I tell them 2 - 3 hours so it’s flexible. Andysquestions 1
BrooklynIrish Posted February 24 Posted February 24 For an initial meeting, I think 90 minutes is ideal but hard to negotiate. So I tend toward 2 hours. But after that, usually one. Over time, I've not found it worth $700-$800 when the actual sex rarely takes longer than 45 minutes. I'm also not necessarily interested in having sex for more than 45 minutes. LOL MikeBiDude, + Pensant and Andysquestions 2 1
Yukon21 Posted February 24 Posted February 24 90 mins on a first meeting. Some guys have a hard time figuring the rate but with a little help they eventually figure it out. 60 mins is just too short and 120 mins way too long if your not clicking. If they become a repeat 90-120 mins works for me. MikeBiDude, Andysquestions, BrickBuilder and 4 others 4 3
pubic_assistance Posted February 24 Posted February 24 I typically book 90 minutes for massage or escort. With escorts, I rarely have trouble booking an extra hour, on the fly, if the session was a lot of fun. jeezifonly, + Pensant, MikeBiDude and 2 others 3 2
+ purplekow Posted February 24 Posted February 24 If you know the escort and he is not a clock watcher, then one hour with a tip is a reasonable choice. If when you walk in the door or he walks in yours and he puts on his music, you know that music is going off after one hour so future sessions would depend on the chemistry. I usually do two hours which gratefully usually ends up being more. I am considering not doing overnight sessions any longer. The expense is one consideration and usually it turns out to be the equivalent of one or two hour sessions with the privledge of sleeping next to a hot guy. If you like that kind of intimacy, then by all means do overnights, but after many years of overnights, I have decided to take a different path. pubic_assistance, thomas, Luv2play and 4 others 4 1 2
+ JamesB Posted February 24 Posted February 24 For a first meeting, I only book 60 minutes. That’s enough time to have some fun and decide if I’d like to see him again. Once I’ve taken the provider for a “test drive,” so to speak, I’ll consider longer sessions depending on the activities. For massages, I usually stick to 90 minutes, while for full play, it could range from 2 to 3 hours. I make the decision on a case by case basis. Andysquestions, KrisParr, TorontoDrew and 4 others 4 1 2
MscleLovr Posted February 24 Posted February 24 4 hours ago, Pensant said: I’m considering a one-hour for a new provider with the option of two if it turns out that the chemistry is good. Entirely agree: I’ve done that previously with new guys. I say beforehand that it’s for an hour but if it works for both of us, I’d like a second hour. It comes down to human interaction. If the new man is a great bottom, I like to extend(ahem) for a second topping. There have been guys who didn't want a second pounding but they readily found other ways to please and delight me in the extra hour. And there have also been guys that were good for an hour…but I had to ‘suddenly recall’ that I had an appointment across town. They were smart enough to know the time was up and we always parted pleasantly. + Pensant, pubic_assistance and Andysquestions 2 1
Boaxxx Posted February 24 Posted February 24 I'm a 90 minute kind of guy unless I'm looking for some specifics in which case I go for two hours. Usually by two hours I'm done and ready to return to my normal life. TorontoDrew, pubic_assistance, Andysquestions and 1 other 3 1
MikeBiDude Posted February 24 Posted February 24 I’m with 90 minutes replies above. Andysquestions, + Pensant, pubic_assistance and 1 other 4
Whippoorwill Posted February 24 Posted February 24 I used to do 1 hr first time, and if it was good, 90 minutes thereafter. However if he is well reviewed on C.O.M. and I perhaps had some positive private chat with the reviewer, I go right to 90 minutes. Andysquestions 1
jeezifonly Posted February 24 Posted February 24 I mostly hire massage. Rarely is 60m enough for a first time, in order for him to do his best version of mixing therapeutic and sensual, so 90m for me. + Vegas_Millennial, Andysquestions, + Pensant and 3 others 4 2
rvwnsd Posted February 24 Posted February 24 76 minutes and 24 seconds. Just kidding. For me, it depends. A local guy, I'll book an hour with the understanding we can go longer (at an appropriate fee) if we so choose. Someone who is visting, I'll go two hours with the understanding we can go longer. Andysquestions 1
+ DrownedBoy Posted February 24 Posted February 24 I do 2 hours but I'm always done by the end of that time. I'd like to know how you book a 90 minute meeting.... Andysquestions 1
Boaxxx Posted February 25 Posted February 25 5 hours ago, DrownedBoy said: I'd like to know how you book a 90 minute meeting.... Easy, simply ask for a 90 minute session. I've never been turned down for that period of time. TorontoDrew, Andysquestions, Colton and 6 others 2 1 4 2
BuffaloKyle Posted February 25 Posted February 25 If you're not sure just book an hour and if the session is going well ask if the provider is ok with extending to two hours. If you're having a good time I am sure the provider is as well so shouldn't be an issue. Also be a good idea beforehand then during the initial appt booking to ask what their rate is for one or two hours so if you do extend in session you'll know the rate as well without having to ask and avoid having any potential awkwardness. rvwnsd, Andysquestions and Occasional 3
+ Pensant Posted February 25 Posted February 25 17 hours ago, MikeBiDude said: I’m with 90 minutes replies above. I may start the 90-minute program. MikeBiDude, + DrownedBoy and Andysquestions 2 1
amused1 Posted March 6 Posted March 6 On 2/24/2025 at 12:40 PM, JamesB said: For a first meeting, I only book 60 minutes. That’s enough time to have some fun and decide if I’d like to see him again. Once I’ve taken the provider for a “test drive,” so to speak, I’ll consider longer sessions depending on the activities. For massages, I usually stick to 90 minutes, while for full play, it could range from 2 to 3 hours. I make the decision on a case by case basis. This is my preferred method as well. Andysquestions 1
ShortCutie7 Posted March 6 Posted March 6 I feel like two hours would be too long without specific plans for that time. While I have never felt rushed in an hour session, I do think that (with a familiar provider) 90 minutes would be the perfect amount of time for some chatting, showering, fun, and spooning… that’s what I would request in an ideal world (where I have the time and money etc). Yukon21, Andysquestions and + WstVlgChris 2 1
Nightowl Posted March 7 Posted March 7 I do at least 90 minutes, two hours if possible. I currently just hire for massage and that gives time for a decent massage plus extras, if they’re on offer. I like it when the provider takes his time and prolongs the anticipation. Andysquestions 1
soloyo215 Posted March 9 Posted March 9 On 2/24/2025 at 5:30 AM, Andysquestions said: While I’ve experienced great one hour sessions, I often wonder if I should do two one hour sessions with different providers, or one two hour session with one provider for the same price. I ask because I see so many guys hiring for 2, 3, 4+ hours. I’m neither in a rush nor a minute man, and I’m not a penny pincher. But with my budget, I can’t just hire endlessly. What do you prefer and why? Never done an all-nighter, so I can't comment on that. In my experience, without rushing, I feel comfortable with having between an hour and an hour and a half, not rushing and not being a one-minute man. Went for two hours and it was ok, but not essential. I have a husband, so that is also factored in when deciding how much time (and money) I'm willing to dedicate to/with providers. Andysquestions 1
d.anders Posted March 9 Posted March 9 In a professional setting, a 60-minute massage is almost always 40-50 minutes on the table, especially for first-time appointments. That has always been my experience. I can barely tie my shoes in 60 minutes, so how could I ever expect much from any other 60-minute service? The days of 2-minute hand jobs are long gone. Even when my doctor is running on time, I still end up being in the office far longer than I ever anticipate. Ancillary stuff happens, depending on the people involved. There is no such thing as a perfect clock in any service business. On the other hand, to be stuck on a table during a bad massage for 90 minutes is a unique torture one needs to experience to decide what is the best option. For me, the general rule is, when you discover a good thing, make sure to allow enough time to truly savor the pleasure. + Vegas_Millennial, Andysquestions and Nightowl 2 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now