Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Occasionally I see an ad for a hot traveling provider. These are generally newbies, often from Colombia, and very hot and hung. They are invariably staying at downscale motels near airports and turn out to be hosting only. When I invite them over, they either respond in-call only, or add a $200 surcharge for taking a $20 Uber, which I’d reimburse for in any case (the Uber, that is; not the surcharge). I wouldn’t object to a $50 surcharge.

This has happened 3 times in the past month. What’s so hard about doing an outcall? I wonder if they’re being “managed” in some way. Either way, I’m not risking an incident visiting a fleabag motel. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Pensant said:

Occasionally I see an ad for a hot traveling provider. These are generally newbies, often from Colombia, and very hot and hung. They are invariably staying at downscale motels near airports and turn out to be hosting only. When I invite them over, they either respond in-call only, or add a $200 surcharge for taking a $20 Uber, which I’d reimburse for in any case (the Uber, that is; not the surcharge). I wouldn’t object to a $50 surcharge.

This has happened 3 times in the past month. What’s so hard about doing an outcall? I wonder if they’re being “managed” in some way. Either way, I’m not risking an incident visiting a fleabag motel. 

Could very well be. Or they simply don’t know the area too well and would prefer not to travel outside from where they are staying.

Posted
22 hours ago, Pensant said:

Occasionally I see an ad for a hot traveling provider. These are generally newbies, often from Colombia, and very hot and hung. They are invariably staying at downscale motels near airports and turn out to be hosting only. When I invite them over, they either respond in-call only, or add a $200 surcharge for taking a $20 Uber, which I’d reimburse for in any case (the Uber, that is; not the surcharge). I wouldn’t object to a $50 surcharge.

This has happened 3 times in the past month. What’s so hard about doing an outcall? I wonder if they’re being “managed” in some way. Either way, I’m not risking an incident visiting a fleabag motel. 

My guess is that it's a "higher-risk situation" fee. You might not have any ill-intentions with the provider, but that's not necessarily the case with others. They are in a foreign land probably with little knowledge of their rights or how to protect themselves.

Just a guess.

Posted
23 hours ago, Pensant said:

Occasionally I see an ad for a hot traveling provider. These are generally newbies, often from Colombia, and very hot and hung. They are invariably staying at downscale motels near airports and turn out to be hosting only. When I invite them over, they either respond in-call only, or add a $200 surcharge for taking a $20 Uber, which I’d reimburse for in any case (the Uber, that is; not the surcharge). I wouldn’t object to a $50 surcharge.

This has happened 3 times in the past month. What’s so hard about doing an outcall? I wonder if they’re being “managed” in some way. Either way, I’m not risking an incident visiting a fleabag motel. 

Maybe they want to take as many clients as possible during their visit and don’t want to use up too much time traveling.

Posted
On 3/1/2025 at 6:24 AM, Pensant said:

Occasionally I see an ad for a hot traveling provider. These are generally newbies, often from Colombia, and very hot and hung. They are invariably staying at downscale motels near airports and turn out to be hosting only. When I invite them over, they either respond in-call only, or add a $200 surcharge for taking a $20 Uber, which I’d reimburse for in any case (the Uber, that is; not the surcharge). I wouldn’t object to a $50 surcharge.

This has happened 3 times in the past month. What’s so hard about doing an outcall? I wonder if they’re being “managed” in some way. Either way, I’m not risking an incident visiting a fleabag motel. 

By "downscale motel near airports" are you referring to a No-Tell Motel/Days Inn/Motel 6 or a Courtyard by Marriott/Hampton Inn? If the latter, they are not particularly downscale and would be just fine for an hour or two playdate. No-Tell Motel, on the other hand could be pretty dicey.

UPDATE: @Pensant confirmed down-thread he was referring to dirty, mold-covered, bedbug-infested establishments. In other words, makes you wonder whether you should even invite the guy into your home.

Posted (edited)
On 3/1/2025 at 5:24 AM, Pensant said:

Occasionally I see an ad for a hot traveling provider. These are generally newbies, often from Colombia, and very hot and hung. They are invariably staying at downscale motels near airports and turn out to be hosting only. When I invite them over, they either respond in-call only, or add a $200 surcharge for taking a $20 Uber, which I’d reimburse for in any case (the Uber, that is; not the surcharge). I wouldn’t object to a $50 surcharge.

This has happened 3 times in the past month. What’s so hard about doing an outcall? I wonder if they’re being “managed” in some way. Either way, I’m not risking an incident visiting a fleabag motel. 

Where do you live?

It's their business model and maybe they don't know any better. They're just more comfortable staying at an affordable hotel and only doing in calls in a city they don't know. It's up to them to change their business model later if it doesn't work.

 

Edited by marylander1940
Posted (edited)
On 3/2/2025 at 4:41 AM, Nightowl said:

Maybe they want to take as many clients as possible during their visit and don’t want to use up too much time traveling.

And also stay at an affordable place. Damn if they do and damn if they don't. Guys complain when someone stays downtown and complains when he doesn't

At least everyone knows where the airport is and there's parking right in front of the motel

Edited by marylander1940
Posted
On 3/1/2025 at 8:15 AM, DrownedBoy said:

Don't forget what would happen to providers visiting from Columbia if Homeland Security got wind in the current political atmosphere.

What makes you think they are visiting? Some of them could be overstaying their Visa or in legal limbo trying to remain in the country.

Posted
7 hours ago, rvwnsd said:

By "downscale motel near airports"

Think places with all “1-star”Google reviews (because you can’t rate 0) and consistent reports of bedbugs, mold and stained carpets and bedding.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Pensant said:

Think places with all “1-star”Google reviews (because you can’t rate 0) and consistent reports of bedbugs, mold and stained carpets and bedding.

Move on! Plenty of guys available!

Posted
7 hours ago, Pensant said:

Think places with all “1-star”Google reviews (because you can’t rate 0) and consistent reports of bedbugs, mold and stained carpets and bedding.

BLECH! Yep, move on. Don't even invite them over. You don't want bedbugs following them into your house.

Posted

You don’t say what area you’re in, but in LA, for example, everything is so far away when you don’t know the region (gotta know more than DTLA and WeHo) it’s got to be very intimidating for anyone here for the first time on a budget. 
 

The client always has the power to simplify. 
“ok, thx for getting back, I’m sorry we’re not a match. Travel safely”

 

Posted

In 2025 we have the ability to sexually connect with strangers simply by pushing a few buttons on our hand held devices. This is the LEAST complicated time for on-demand sex. You’re upset because these guys aren’t arriving with the same convenience of a pizza? 🍕 

Posted
On 3/3/2025 at 1:59 PM, Simon Suraci said:

10-2 window during the day tends to be my most in-demand time.

I find this to be very interesting.  I know I prefer that time but didn’t realize others did as well.  

Posted

It's exactly as @Simon Suraci said; outcalls take away too much time out of your day. 

At the very least you have to allocate an additional hour for travel and setup and have a safely net if there's traffic on your return trip before your next session.

There's also parking to consider 😖

Posted (edited)

It's the human condition.   Things are complicated.  Any number of possible reasons, even if some are unlikely yet not impossible. There are also bad potential clients, and bad escorts advertising.   

  • They want travel time
  • They're just concerned about the security and conditions where they're being asked to travel.
  • Better time management if they have multiple appointments. 
  • Getting them to travel and waste time may be the fetish-desire for the guys that get off on wasting their time.  No one home - ha ha!
  • Last minute cancelation rate is so high, at least it's less wasted time and money if it happens on in-call. 
  • They're nervous that clients have recording equipment setup.
  • Maybe it's a sting.
  • Maybe they have a safety net buddy in the adjacent room or lobby.  
  • The escort is a bad guy, has plans for client arrival. E.g. Recording.  Thugs for shake-down.  

Probably many many more reasons in support of incall or outcall.

 

 

Edited by LaffingBear

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...