SirBillybob

Correct. Also, Stock (+ Stock’n’Soda) and Club Unity are independent of each other, not operated by the same entity. What is unclear is whether they are currently leasing. A listing is not a sale. I imagine it would need to be sold prior to any venue closures, also depending on prospective new owner’s goals.

Classic pocket text, or he just mainlined one Red Bull too many.

This dynamic also occasionally occurs with Airbnb hosts, the scale quietly flipping from feedback to magnanimous compliance, albeit the added complexity of reviews sitting in mutual double-blind escrow. No such pact exists in the same manner for our hobby. The minute the provider petitions for a 5, the scale collapses into a loyalty oath in which the majority of consumers are complicit. If a 4 or blanking (refraining from entering a 4 in spite of overall satisfaction) needs defending, 5 has already lost its meaning.

Who knew?! An additional platform inconsistency to chew on. A 4.5 average without context is often a caution for consumers in today’s age, however warranted or not. These small differences can represent considerable reputational demotions.

See screenshots. I’m seeing 5.0 average on Peck. I looked up a local guy Dylan … 89 reviews: 83 at 5, 2 at 4, 1 at 2, 3 at 1 … average 4.81; platform depicts 4.8 as expected.

How would it drop to 4.5 stars average overall? With 100+ existing ratings and a 5.00 average, one additional but lower rating (assuming 100 baseline ratings) of 4 stars would drop the average to 4.99 … 504/101 vs 505/101. Does the rating system round down by 0.5 increments even if well above the midpoint of two nonfractionated scores? I thought it would round up to 5 in this case. At greater than 100 ratings it’s conceivable that not all previous ratings were 5. I’ll have to look at patterns with other advertisers. ——- Addendum: I see averages are in 0.1 to 1.0 increments beyond the rounded nonfractionated scores, so I think the 4.99 (or anything 4.95 or greater) would be 5, and an average score as low as 4.50 would require an average rating of between 4.45 and 4.54 at the hundredths level.

Not divided even a little?

Why I have this …

Wasn’t working for me earlier but is now.

One Rotten Tomatoes review sums it up as a “punishing watch”, but it’s Richard Gadd of Baby Reindeer, buffed up. I think I’ll wait to binge the first half of the 6 episodes. I read an interview but it’s a bit of a plot spoiler, which I don’t mind in some cases.

How very dare Prime Video. Max penalty for icing. Just glide your Zamboni over it till Tierney drops S2.

Excuse the drunk history, but I thought that medieval regimes regulated prostitution. Same moral handwringing; appetite for punitive consequences developing later.

Pseudonymously Teflon? Registered trademark FLASHNESS? Don’t expect stainless in the pan. 🤷🏼‍♂️

One way to crash a BBQ …