SirBillybob

OK, now I’m confused …

Oh. That episode.

OK, now I’m confused …

You shouldn't be confused.
The problem isn't Bozo breaking wind, it is the provider.
BTC
🤡

Definitely Fred Mertz!
Young Bozo's first orgasm was a nocturnal wet dream fantasizing about being dominated by Fred Mertz.
And after the sex, being smacked around and ordered to service and pleasure him.
BTC
🤡

What are your 'fatal flaws' that providers do...
 
For Bozo, hiring a gassy provider is always a "fatal flaw".
Bozo always makes it a point to avoid eating lentils, beans, cole slaw, broccoli, and other cruciferous vegetables for at least 6 hours prior to a scheduled appointment. There is no reason why an escort or masseur can't do the same.
Flatulence is a real mood-killer 🙁.
BTC
🤡

Show off.😏

Show off.😏

Unfortunately marked central adiposity is common with aging even with good nutrition, exercise, and unremarkable lab results … unless of course an embryo was secretly planted in one’s abdominal cavity. Far more likely is that my waistline has taken out a reverse mortgage on the rest of my physique. 
It just isn’t highlighted in the brochure for turning 60, what have you. There’s no reliable way to spot-lose belly fat. To me the target that is healthier and more realistic than chasing the tape measurement I had at age 35 is maintaining strength, mobility, and metabolic health. 
But if you are otherwise thin and up to it, pectoral development … flat or incline press, flys, &c …  will visually offset the differential. 

#1 OF is, categorically, erotica unless the consumer morphs it into an ad platform through gaming the firewalls. It’s typically more “Will I pay for this version of porn”? Sometimes but rarely, “Do you meet?”
#2 Strip clubs obligate payment for cover and drinks only. Uncovering optional. I think the internal question there is more “Do I pay for this version of commercial sex work?” Sometimes, “Is there a booth available?” 
#3 The third option referenced is clear and may proceed from Part 2 of #2 or be sourced independently of #2. Sometimes, “How much, and how much do I get?” 
For 1-on-1 in-person I will 99% of the time have interacted a bit in-person, so obviously strip clubs or similar venues trump ad platforms, their inherent mystery, and associated detective work.
So … Bachelor #2.

#1 in petty officer rank

If you can get a word in.😏

For me, quite well. Once locally for years. Currently abroad with my celibacy structured between visits; less ideal, and totally related to my satisfaction rating and not anybody else’s expectations, but maybe the distance itself is a factor. I should add that the latter single preference simmered over time, as comparators were sampled with no particular disappointment. 
The smouldering part is my lust, not remotely loyalty; I wasn’t born yesterday. But if it ain’t broke don’t fix it; it’s just that the unbreakable at that high level is rare. And Zane Phillips is unavailable. 

I am reluctant to pathologize infatuation, lest Gilead require a bail out.
I think that monogamish is less something you try than what you already are, within the confines of any given minute.
 

OP: Age 18+ recommendations, please; no upper limit but youthful bearing and able to read ‘Daddy’ off a cue card.
Replies: Before we proceed, let’s convene a Model UN symposium on international age-of-majority thresholds.

Hydrate. It’s free, the least you can do, the most you can do for seminal fluid volume, and the only do I’d recommend. Otherwise, the list is comprised of don’ts, eg, smoking, poor diet, etc, that negatively correlate with ejaculatory robustness. Also be aware of the distinction between semen and sperm in terms of influence targets. 

Your post is a very sensible contribution to the thread. A budget preference isn’t a referendum on anyone’s value, and a provider making a discretionary accommodation needn’t be one on his either. Through fair human interaction essentially dismantling the doctrine of ‘no discount ever ever, even if hell freezes over’, neither pushover nor bargain hunter labels need be assigned. Often simply knowing somebody empathizes with our reality and how we construct value in relation to desire encourages magnanimity. 

Isn’t there an operations manual than would render these discussions unnecessary. 🤷🏼‍♂️😏

It’s in my genes. Your eugenics may cull me out.

#1 in petty officer rank

This has been tabled before. If it had legs the lexicon would have a happy ending. 
“Two providers, both alike in dignity …” See how that worked out? 

It’s in my genes. Your eugenics may cull me out.

It’s in my genes. Your eugenics may cull me out.

This has been tabled before. If it had legs the lexicon would have a happy ending. 
“Two providers, both alike in dignity …” See how that worked out? 

American English?