Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I often see providers’ ads using the term “sub” or”sub bottom”. I understand that an escort will “submit” to being topped. In that sense I guess, aren’t all bottoms  “sub”? Or is there a difference?

The reason I ask is I hired a provider who under a few different names over the years has been a relatively well known bottom in many videos. During our session he started calling me sir, and would say things like yes sir and thank you sir. I have hired many bottoms in the past but had never heard responses like that from any other. It was quite unexpected. I have noticed he’s started doing that in his most recent videos and collaborations as well.

So my question: is this what I should expect from all escorts who advertise as “sub” or”sub bottom”? Or is “sub” a term that just generally indicates a guy is primarily a bottom?

Posted

Not necessarily. Not all bottoms are "sub." There can also be a power bottom.

If there are providers that do call themselves "sub," then usually that means they're submissive and you can expect some dom/sub interaction. But always make sure to chat about the expectation before setting up your session. Just because someone calls themselves a sub doesn't mean you can go free-for-all.

Posted

Yes I agree it’s short for submissive, which can usually mean they’ll bottom for you, and generally be submissive to your demands, hence the ‘sir’. But not everyone who will bottom will do so submissively. If I bottom I usually prefer to do that from a non submissive position. Whatever you see on a guys profile should be taken as illustrative; check with him what he means by it to avoid any awkward misunderstandings…

Posted

It’s very common in the southern United States for people to address others older or more senior than them as sir or ma’am. It’s simply a sign of respect.

Posted

Sub is an attitude, a dynamic, a preference to submit; not an act or a sexual position role. While bottoming often is considered a submissive act and lots of subs like to bottom, not all penis-in-hole action happens in the context of an insertive partner “dominating” a receptive partner.

A passive, submissive top can be dominated. For example in a cuckold situation, where the dynamics are such that the bottom is performing an act of rebellion, control, or even revenge, depending on the scene. The focus is not on the bottom “submitting” to some other lover, but rather using the third party to dominate the first party, in a way.

I’ve bound tops to my table, pleasure tortured them, employed impact play, edged them, and sat on their cock, to milk their load in an act of total control and domination. This scenario is less commonly requested, but it’s definitely a thing. Submission and domination are not about who is “insertive”. It’s about the dynamics, the headspace; who is willingly (sometimes wantonly) relinquishing control, and who is actively taking control.

I should note, a switch is a thing. Someone can submit in one encounter and dominate in another. Sometimes even in the same encounter, but I seldom see these situations manifest in the same scene. Being a sub can be an identity when one assigns it to himself, however, submitting once, sometimes, or even most of the time does not define someone as a sub. To submit is a verb. A sub is only a noun when one owns the identity within the context of a finite scene, or perhaps permanently when one identifies this way. That’s up to the individual to self define.

In short: sex acts alone do not define dominance or submission.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...