Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Michael Boston has a prolific porn career. It's probably why he feels he can get that rate. More power to him.

People sometimes fail to realize when you see the date on an account, it doesn't always mean a lot for various reasons. Some providers start a RM profile but never activate it. When they finally do, it shows the date when the profile was created, not how long it's been active. He may have created his ad in 2023, but it doesn't mean he's been advertising since then. That could account for having no reviews.

Also in regard to no reviews... since RM changed their review policy where you have to be a paid member, the number of reviews have appeared to have dropped significantly. I'm almost certain most people using RM aren't paid members. So they can't leave a review no matter how much they want to. I have had providers ask me to leave them reviews on RM... I just can't because I'm not a paid member.

Edited by big-n-tall
Posted
49 minutes ago, BenjaminNicholas said:

The usual setup for these threads.

Start with a high price and then dogpile on the guy.

Rinse, repeat.

Sorta have to agree with you.  If our gentle readers do not like his price, then block him on rent.men and move along, no need to dish, slam, hate on, or become an internet therapist for him.

(I have to say I am surprised that the standard chorus of "oh he kisses so he is probably worth it" or "oh he takes loads how unsafe" have not rained down yet...but i am ever the optimist so.....

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Yukon21 said:

No piling on here.  The title of the post asks "Anyone interested for $1000/hour?" The posters are only replying to the question. 

Au contraire, a leading question masquerading as a statement. It implicitly offers safety in numbers regarding the judgement. The ad asks for a leap of faith because he is making one based on viewer screening. OP leap of faith is that others corroborate a view of ad audacity as filtered through one subjective perspective of appeal against price.

A more neutral approach would be to simply inquire a 411. You’d have yielded the leading question through introducing a starting gate with answers to a question that was not actually posed. 

Edited by SirBillybob
Posted

Question or statement...does it matter?  I appreciate knowing what well-known porn actors are charging and don't really care if there was some implicit bias involved.  There was no slamming, hate, etc.   We talk about cost in all industries  so why is it any different here?  "Did you see what GM is charging for their new Escalade?"   I could type that on an automotive forum and nobody would think twice.   Someone poses a similar question/statement on this forum and all Hell breaks loose.   Strange.    

Posted
7 hours ago, Yukon21 said:

No.  Nobody in this business is worth that to me and having his ad up for almost two years with no reviews means Im not alone in that thinking. 

I agree.  

Posted

Its a free country, its in our constitution to say something that others don't agree with it. As long as I am not physically harming anyone. Netflix keeps raising prices and I don't agree with it and the prices of eggs keep going up, I don't agree with it either. 

Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, Medin said:

Question or statement...does it matter?  I appreciate knowing what well-known porn actors are charging and don't really care if there was some implicit bias involved.  There was no slamming, hate, etc.   We talk about cost in all industries  so why is it any different here?  "Did you see what GM is charging for their new Escalade?"   I could type that on an automotive forum and nobody would think twice.   Someone poses a similar question/statement on this forum and all Hell breaks loose.   Strange.    

Is it really all hell breaking loose, though? There’s no Groundhog Day -grade commentary on auto forums and the themes there don’t intersect libido and cash. All that’s being opined is that at a certain point any discussion of objective price and subjective worth is superfluous and gratuitous when it would necessitate a shaking off of criticism and devaluation whether or not the object of criticism were to be exposed to same. Moreover, a savvy advertiser is cognizant of the reality that such critique arises from a dismissible irrelevant few. It’s client yield that influences price. The topic may be unstoppable but tired and boring enough to align the brakes.

~ Herb 

IMG_6752.gif

Edited by SirBillybob
Posted
5 minutes ago, Tandy Newton said:

Its a free country, its in our constitution to say something that others don't agree with it. As long as I am not physically harming anyone. Netflix keeps raising prices and I don't agree with it and the prices of eggs keep going up, I don't agree with it either. 

Indeed. And others are free to criticize others, as is being done here.

Posted (edited)

It feels like the posing of the title could be bait for a cascade of criticism and beratement of the provider in question. It could also just be a remarking at the high price, which is ok. Of course the average person on this forum doesn’t have $1000 to spend on a meetup with the extremely popular porn star Michael Boston.

You can feel free to tell us how much you aren’t able to pay to meet him. Just as some of us are free to comment on patterns that lead to unjustified provider degradation.  
 

Thankfully, the only personal attack that has occurred is the suggestion that he (an onlyfans creator in the top 1% of income generating pornstars) is supposedly charging $1K for his “sense of self esteem”.

 

Edited by SkyBliss
Posted

At least with Michael Boston, you'd get the joy of being in his company with a sexual exploit thrown in. When Jeff Stryker advertised on rentboy, he was the same price to take him out to lunch - price of lunch extra! No sex, just a mid-day meal. 

I don't think I've been so shocked at seeing an uncircumcised penis on a guy as much as I was with Mr. Boston. He keeps his jock strap on so frequently, it was a long while before I viewed his goods. Now that he's ramped up his fitness level, he's completely nude more often. His rate is overnight material, not one hour in my opinion. 

Posted
8 hours ago, BuffaloKyle said:

Once I win the lotto I'll be interested. 😅

After reading all the replies on here I'd like to clarify that my stance is that if I had the money I'd hire him in a heartbeat. It wasn't a knock at him not being hot enough for instance to charge $1k. As a big name porn star I can totally understand why he charges $1k. I just stick to guys in the $300 range.

Posted (edited)

If Boston’s a true gay bottom he might be willing to pay $1,000 in Cali to my Brazilian $100 go-to situated in Rio. My favourite for a decade due to appeal and attitude, not price. Getting, being and lodging there is the $ kicker. I’d subsidize it by $500, a discount in Boston’s favour for the Boston creampie, to watch even just for the sake of a bucket list checkmark. 

Edited by SirBillybob
Posted

Having briefly encountered the gent in question at an event, I'd consider it. Our connection was brief but sexy, sweet, focused, and memorably erotic. Plus he looked better in person than I expected. Which is only to say: if I was in the market to hire at this rate, this gent would be toward the top of my list.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...