Jump to content

APPLE1

+ Supporters
  • Posts

    221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    + APPLE1 reacted to DWnyc in Issues or Risks During Time of Service   
    Not to bring up a topic that never seems to go well on here, but just because a provider doesn’t list PNP on their profile doesn’t mean they’re not doing it in their private life. I’ve twice experienced providers having reactions which I’m pretty sure we’re based on one of the liquid varieties enjoyed before I arrived and I had to deal with them being the only person around.
    Many states have some kind of  Good Samaritan laws; in theory you won’t get in legal trouble or face questions as to how you got in the situation you find yourself if you call an ambulance for someone in distress (suspected overdose, heart attack, stroke etc)
     
  2. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to Simon Suraci in Definition of a regular client   
    Fair enough. I know many here feel the same way. I don’t knock anyone for hiring many guys, having a stable rotation, or even a continuous string of one-and-done experiences. To each their own. There is no correct way to hire.
    You might fit someone’s definition of a regular, or you might not, depending on how often you hire and/or what kinds of experiences you prefer to have. Sometimes you don’t want to get that close to, or too comfortable with, one person. Hiring is a way to meet your needs on your own terms.
    When you can text a provider and they know exactly who you are and what you need, and the only thing you have to confirm is the time…I personally would consider that a regular. 
  3. Like
    + APPLE1 reacted to + DrownedBoy in Definition of a regular client   
    After reading @Simon Suraci I should add that I purposefully avoid seeing any one escort too often, since I like variety. Then again, I don't exactly hire for a BFE.
  4. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to + KensingtonHomo in Actual experiences with legal problems using RM?   
    I use a Burner app that is not in my name, and I can delete it from my phone. I recently spoke to a provider who travels internationally. He backs his "work" phone up to the cloud and then hard resets it before customs. 
    I don't know your demography but it is extremely unlikely that you would even be of interest to law enforcement. The reality is that the police target poor Johns and massage parlors and other places where it's easy to do mass arrests. They also target sex workers who are poor and marginalized. Given the breadth of this group, if people were running into issues, I suspect we'd all know. 
  5. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to maninsoma in Actual experiences with legal problems using RM?   
    You asked about legal problems.  Apart from a couple of stories I've read about online (i.e., no personal knowledge), I think that risk is very low. 
    What seems to be a larger risk is extortion or, at least, attempts at extortion.  If you have a lot to lose if your hiring habit becomes known to others, then someone attempting to extort you puts you at risk.  That's why you'll see some here advocating the use of a burner phone and never meeting anyone where they live.  I didn't take either of those precautions and never had anyone try to extort me, but I did almost hire someone whom I subsequently read about here who did threaten to expose clients to their families.  I felt like I dodged a bullet there even though I don't think that being exposed to colleagues or family would have caused any problems for me other than whatever gossip people might have engaged in following the disclosure.
  6. Like
    + APPLE1 reacted to + Vegas_Millennial in Actual experiences with legal problems using RM?   
    Las Vegas is not in a blue state.  To answer your question, I've hired my share of male escorts in Las Vegas, but usually hire masseurs.  When we get a blue majority in the legislature or city council they begin closing the massage parlors and proposing laws to further restrict sex workers, but thankfully we have enough former and current sex workers in the legislature to keep some of the legal brothers open.  (This post is not to argue politics, but to answer the question of legal hiring experience in Las Vegas).
  7. Applause
    + APPLE1 reacted to + nycman in Setback re: Gonorrhea PEP & Vaxx   
    Was there ever a "good" time?……grin
  8. Like
    + APPLE1 got a reaction from SirBillybob in Setback re: Gonorrhea PEP & Vaxx   
    My biggest concern at this point is for the speed at which the DoxyPREP regimen may accelerate the resistance of chlamydia and syphilis.
    Obviously, it is a bit of a summary article and not a not a journal article on the research data, but I am gathering that while chlamydia remained relatively constant, starting at 88% with the initial DoxyPREP trial and 89% a year in, syphilis was initially 87% and fell to 79% a year in.
    If the big picture observations are that:
    - DoxyPREP only reduces gonorrhea infection rate by 33%;
    -studies show evidence that vaccination with meningococcal B by itself reduce gonorrhea by 30 - 50%;
    -current scientific theory tells us that short bursts of antibiotics contribute resistance;
    -antibiotics take a toll on body systems; and
    -we already know that Benzathine Penicillin G is already a better treatment for syphilis than doxycycline
    I would place my faith in vaccination for gonorrhea, treat syphilis with the superior antibiotic, and treat both gonorrhea and chlamydia with a FULL course of Doxycycline as needed.
    And of course, pray to the pharmaceutical and profit gods for vaccines specific for all three!
  9. Like
    + APPLE1 got a reaction from + azdr0710 in Why does everything need to be served spicy now?   
    Adding a non traditional spice to a dish is a cheap and easy way to make it unique and create a niche market. Unique and niche are always easier tools to use when appealing to the masses. Subtle flavor changes often go unnoticed and under appreciated by the masses.
    Add chili pepper to mac n cheese, and most people will recognize it as bold, spicy, and unique. Make Mac n cheese with butter and cheese from grass fed cattle, and very few people will realize, or appreciate, the subtle flavor difference.
  10. Like
    + APPLE1 reacted to Simon Suraci in Question about escort standards/norms   
    I don’t always cum, but my reasons have less to do with saving it up for the next client and more to do with client satisfaction. My focus is the client. If he wants me to cum, perhaps in a specific way, I make it happen for him. If he is ambivalent, I see no point in wasting my sexual energy trying to put the spotlight on my climax. And yes, saving up my spunk is very much a real concern, particularly when I have more than one client in a day.
    Frankly, I am often not ready to cum when the client asks/demands it of me and I have to catch up. If I can satisfy the client without having to force myself in such a way, it’s a big relief. I would rather not cum at all than push myself into a rushed, less than stellar orgasm. That thinking applies whether or not I have other clients that day.
    Recently in a session I came a bit early, about halfway through the session, pulling out and shooting all over the client. We were having quite a hot time together. It was one of those jizzy but not quite complete orgasms. I told him not to worry, that we weren’t done. We played around doing other activities for a while (which he very much enjoyed) until I was ready to go again. I lasted much better the second time, and made him cum as I pounded him. Then shortly afterwards, at his request - much more intentionally and pleasurably this time - I came inside of him. It was hot!
    Sometimes all the client wants is for one of us to fuck the other (or flip) until the client cums in whatever way he wants. Sometimes it’s fast, sometimes it’s drawn out. I’m not rushing the client. I respond to his body language and verbal cues. The time is his. If either or both of us cum well before the time is up, I offer several things like cuddling, massage time, or a shower together, or sometimes all three when the client is eager to reach the finish line way early. 
    It’s less frequent, but some clients don’t feel the need to cum at all. Fine by me. As long as the client is happy, because that’s what really counts.
    Some of my clients end their sessions early. It’s never me saying it’s over and then rushing them out the door. When they are done early, I ask if they are satisfied, and if there is anything I can do to make the rest of our time together enjoyable. Sometimes they say they are truly satisfied and ready to wrap up. With me at least, the approach to all these issues is client centric.
    Tip for any client for whom provider cum is an important part of his satisfaction: request this when you book. When your provider knows your expectations, he can meet them.
    Even better: book him regularly so you don’t even have to say what you need the next time. He knows what you like, what’s important to you, and if he’s any good, he will note it and deliver it again and again.
  11. Like
    + APPLE1 reacted to DWnyc in Question about escort standards/norms   
    I don’t need or want providers to climax - they can save it for another client or someone they actually want to be with. I often tell them this and it often provides some relief (of a different kind). I also want to avoid a situation where they’re done and they hate every remaining minute where they can’t trick themselves into feeling it’s enjoyable for them.
    On a couple of occasions though they’ve actually wanted to climax during a session themselves - which surprised me. nothing  to do with me - more I guess moving from one situation to the next, not building up tension, if not seeing others that day trying to switch attention to other areas of their life perhaps … once I was surprised as given only a few seconds warning and asked where I wanted it, and on another was requested to stay a few mins to help the situation in what I thought was an attempt at upsell but apparently wasnt.
     
  12. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to SouthOfTheBorder in Question about escort standards/norms   
    I always tell providers that my experience is not dependent on whether I cum or not.  I let them know what I enjoy and to focus on that.  I’ve found that as I’ve gotten older, I can reach a point of overstimulation where cumming isn’t likely to happen - although I’m very much enjoying the sex. It seems to take the pressure off both parties & I have better overall outcomes.
    I don’t expect a provider to cum ever.  If they want to, then fine. 
    As for the time - I’m the clock watcher & will remind him I’m aware of the time at the 50 minute mark.  about 50% of the time, I’ll ask to extend & pay. For the rest, an hour is sufficient.  If we’re both having fun & he just wants to stay, that’s ok too.  I can only remember one guy shorting me on time, although a few times where I left early.  I think it’s reasonable to confirm you will get a full hour before you schedule.
    I keep my expectations low & reasonable, while treating the provider as I would any other guest. 
    Drinks are always offered before & after if in my home/hotel.  Shower offered after, of course.  
  13. Haha
    + APPLE1 reacted to + Vegas_Millennial in Issues or Risks During Time of Service   
    This has happened to me several times.  On several hiring occasions I began to sing showtunes, which happens when I am happy and have been drinking.
    None of the providers who experienced this with me raised any issues regarding increased risks on subsequent visits.
  14. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to + KensingtonHomo in Issues or Risks During Time of Service   
    I agree that unless one is into using drugs with a provider, it's unlikely this would be an issue. 
    However, in the vanishingly small chance that it would happen, I would approach it as humanely as possible. If necessary, call for an ambulance. Wait until they arrive. If the provider is conscious, see if there's someone they want you to call. 
    If you are concerned about how this person got into your room or home, say they're a friend. If it's a hotel, say you met them at the bar or pool. I imagine guys who are closeted or cheating may be worried about being exposed but there's little chance of anyone finding out. If it's a medical emergency, the person who is ill has a right to privacy. 
  15. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to + DrownedBoy in Issues or Risks During Time of Service   
    I heard of an client who told the escort, that if he had a heart attack or something, he should just leave.
    The escort had no plans to run off, and planned to call 911 and perform first aid as needed.
    Some people's idea of privacy or propriety goes way overboard.
  16. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to DWnyc in Definition of a regular client   
    I hope this is the case …
    My criteria is when I text and say “Hey how are you …” they don’t reply “Sorry, who is this?”
     
  17. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to + keroscenefire in Definition of a regular client   
    I think "regular" is pretty subjective and might even depend on client vs escort. Like as a client, I honestly would consider a "regular" to be anyone I see multiple times a year. That might only be 3-4 times a year. But to the escort that could be just an occasional client. 
    Unfortunately I don't really have the budget to hire multiple times in a month and never would get a "regular" that I meet even monthly. But I have built a good rapport with several guys and definitely feel like we are somewhat "regulars" to each other. I definitely think about them if/when I am considering a bigger hire.
  18. Like
    + APPLE1 reacted to JoeWinkoReturns in Throphies I gave to All the men who have taken me on long drives   
    These are a bunch of throphies that I gave out to every stranger who takes me on a long drive as a token of my graditude ♥ These are all the ones I have given out so far ♥ Please share your thoughts! ♥ what do you think of them? 😁
    & PLEASE HOPE & IMAGINE that I find someone to take me back to ARKANSAS, MISSOURI, & OKLAHOMA ⛤ ♥ ⛤ SO MOTE IT BE ⛤










  19. Haha
    + APPLE1 reacted to samhexum in Plenty of fish in the sea!   
    you just have to change your definition of 'young' to under 70.
  20. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to SirBillybob in Setback re: Gonorrhea PEP & Vaxx   
    Re: thread merging. Thanks for inserting the year-old topic. I had been aware of it. I consciously started the new topic as it is specific to the one bacterial STI [gonorrhea] most concerning for its increasing standard treatment failure rate, as well as adds vaccination concepts (eg, Bexsero) not included in the previous discussion but that had been referenced in at least one other thread on the board. Moreover, the previous topic discussion is antimicrobial resistance focused and requires unpacking the merits and liabilities of DoxyPEP alone across a broader range of viral and bacterial diseases. There are also several separate threads more relevant to gonorrhea alone over the past year, including vaccination as mentioned, newly emerging first-in-class oral treatment medications, and acute disseminated gonococcal disease. Anybody wishing a more integrative reading experience is advised to use the search term ‘gonorrhea’ on the board. 
  21. Like
    + APPLE1 got a reaction from pubic_assistance in Why does everything need to be served spicy now?   
    Adding a non traditional spice to a dish is a cheap and easy way to make it unique and create a niche market. Unique and niche are always easier tools to use when appealing to the masses. Subtle flavor changes often go unnoticed and under appreciated by the masses.
    Add chili pepper to mac n cheese, and most people will recognize it as bold, spicy, and unique. Make Mac n cheese with butter and cheese from grass fed cattle, and very few people will realize, or appreciate, the subtle flavor difference.
  22. Agree
    + APPLE1 got a reaction from Your Man in Arlington in 4 words that change the dynamic of a session   
    You have a mouth, 2 hands, and 2 feet. If something isn't working, or is working too well, REARRANGE! Any GOOD activity partner will read the cues and rearrange with you.
  23. Haha
    + APPLE1 got a reaction from viewing ownly in ScottTyson   
    None. I was simply defining the term abandon as it was used here.
  24. Like
    + APPLE1 got a reaction from + Vegas_Millennial in ScottTyson   
    To act with abandon = wildly, without restraint, carefree
  25. Agree
    + APPLE1 reacted to + BenjaminNicholas in HSV-1 recurrence   
    It's possible, but we're not the people to ask.
    Go see your doctor.  Make sure.
×
×
  • Create New...