maninsoma

Just in case some people don't want to click the link to read the entire article, I think the broader point that should cause some concern for people in the Mahoning Valley area of Ohio: The prospective client responded to what he thought was a (heterosexual) escort ad but was instead contacting undercover police. He showed up with burglary tools, yes, which seems odd for someone as wealth as him and was arrested. It sounds like they already let him plea down to "disorderly conduct," but maybe that's because he's rich. Who knows how things go for those arrested who have more meager means. I didn't research the topic further, so I don't know if they just go after potential customers of females or if there is an equivalent program to attempt to arrest people looking to hire males.

Just trying to clarify your last sentence. Are you saying that escorts who can get and stay hard for clients you deem "not inspiring" are "pathological sex addicts?"

With respect to the "worth it" question, it isn't like once you sign up you are locked in for life. You can pay for a month and then suspend your premium status for as long as you want and sign up again in the future if you want. If there's someone I'm interested in who has a significant number of private photos, I'll join for a month and look at as many private galleries of men in my area as I can before the month is up. I personally don't think it's worth it to remain a member on an ongoing basis, but joining for a month occasionally is like paying for someone's OnlyFans page for a month.

I have to admit I've only been to Palm Springs once since 2019, and that was earlier this year. I enjoyed my meal at Trio in 2026, but I did think it wasn't as good as it had been pre-pandemic.

What a shame. Trio was one of my favorite restaurants in Palm Springs.

It looks like he simply chose everything on the list. I interpret the lack of specificity as meaningless apart from the advertiser wanting to make sure that his profile appears regardless which activity is chosen for a search. In other words, even though he lists kissing and socks as "intos" it doesn't mean he's actually willing to kiss or that he has an interest in socks.

I understand the fantasy of wanting to have some sort of sex with hot men one sees in public. I went to Oakland's Pride Festival yesterday and there was a very hot man near the Latin stage that I could barely take my eyes off. Where this thread veers into silly territory for me is actually thinking that a significant portion of hot men would choose to do sex work. It doesn't matter the circumstance -- a lot of men (gay, straight or bi) simply aren't motivated to do sex work, even if it just involves being "serviced."

Maybe he bottoms if he finds the client hot? I noticed his list of what he's into contains two things: jocks and muscle.

Came here looking for information on BrazilPleasure. I don't think it's a case of that advertiser stealing Fredericodedeus' photos since every link on BrazilPleasure's ad lead to Frederico. What does make him seem questionable to me is that I cannot tell if he is actually offering anything other than the opportunity to watch him online, either via subscribing to his Only Fans or by booking an online session with him. Despite posting a travel schedule I could not find any indication that he actually meets clients in person.

I still remember meeting a friend of a friend decades ago who had a vastly inflated image of himself in terms of looks. He wasn't a bad looking guy, but he was far from the model-good-looking type he thought he was. Even though there can be some element of delusion in all of these categories, I'd probably choose muscle and hope that the guy isn't too muscular for my liking. (I like muscle but once it gets into the bodybuilding competition type of musculature I lose interest.)

I'm a stickler about original recordings, so here's the actual theme that was used on the Addams Family show. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFhLYnzGSno

I'm with you. I doubt this guy is "forgetting" to cover the camera. If he wants to record he should get the other person's consent in advance, even if he doesn't intend to share the content with anyone else (and, in this case, he did share content with someone else). Maybe this is all a fantasy/role play thing, though: Guy poses as "straight" (gay for pay) and uses straight porn he filmed with the story that it's "hidden camera" footage because he knows that will turn some clients on.

I just completed watching it at 1.5 speed and still jumped forward quite a bit since the parts I watched weren't grabbing me. I know that isn't exactly a fair way to assess a film, but this really did come across as a soft-core look at kinky sex and depraved people. And that bathtub scene got me hoping that YouTube isn't reporting viewers' IP addresses to law enforcement. I don't know what the filmmakers' intent was with that scene, but given the overall vibe of the film it seemed highly inappropriate.

Thanks for the heads up. I'm only about 15 minutes into it and I'm not sure I will watch all of it because, so far, it's quite amateurish. I will say it's quite explicit for a YouTube video, so even if it doesn't get removed for copyright reasons I could see it going away due to nudity.

I'll join the chorus: Don't assume, ask. One of my worst hires was a masseur who clearly used provocative text and racy photos to suggest a very erotic massage was on offer when the reality was quite different.