Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 hours ago, ShortCutie7 said:

Yes, I first heard of PrEP around 2015. I have had allergic reactions or very uncommon side effects (in some cases delayed) to various medications, hence my reluctance to try a relatively new one.

I have also received yearly COVID and flu vaccines, and am still generally very pro-vaccine, but my reactions to the vaccines have consistently been worse than any time I have had the viruses themselves (yes, I am aware that that is the point of vaccines, but I am also including times I have had the flu before a vaccine). As for masks… masks are not meant to be worn 24/7; it is just not a natural way to breathe. Going straight from never having worn a mask to wearing an N95 all the time caused shortness of breath, skin irritation, headaches where the straps were, etc. I dabble in an industry where I’m acutely aware of these things, and I’m 99% sure that wearing a mask so much permanently impacted my lung capacity.

I would expect working harder to breathe, i.e. exercising, would increase your lung capacity...

Posted
10 hours ago, sniper said:

I would expect working harder to breathe, i.e. exercising, would increase your lung capacity...

Why would you assume I haven’t done that? I don’t want to get too personal on here, but in a nutshell, I had almost superhuman lung capacity pre-pandemic. Now no matter what I do, no matter how hard I work, it’s still above average but not the same.

Posted

Just a suggestion. While you can only test your lung capacity moving forward, you might find it interesting to see what your lung capacity is now compared to others of your gender and age group and based on scientifically-established norms.  Pulmonary function testing is offered in many medical settings.  If you ever feel in the future a change in your lung function you would have a baseline.

Posted
On 3/21/2026 at 9:50 AM, ShortCutie7 said:

Why would you assume I haven’t done that? I don’t want to get too personal on here, but in a nutshell, I had almost superhuman lung capacity pre-pandemic. Now no matter what I do, no matter how hard I work, it’s still above average but not the same.

I'm saying that breathing through the mask was in fact exercise. I don't see how that causes your breathing to be worse after. Now if you contracted COVID at some point, it would make sense that that could cause lasting lung damage. But masking most certainly did not.

Posted
On 3/19/2026 at 11:46 PM, ShortCutie7 said:

Yes, I first heard of PrEP around 2015. I have had allergic reactions or very uncommon side effects (in some cases delayed) to various medications, hence my reluctance to try a relatively new one.

I have also received yearly COVID and flu vaccines, and am still generally very pro-vaccine, but my reactions to the vaccines have consistently been worse than any time I have had the viruses themselves (yes, I am aware that that is the point of vaccines, but I am also including times I have had the flu before a vaccine). As for masks… masks are not meant to be worn 24/7; it is just not a natural way to breathe. Going straight from never having worn a mask to wearing an N95 all the time caused shortness of breath, skin irritation, headaches where the straps were, etc. I dabble in an industry where I’m acutely aware of these things, and I’m 99% sure that wearing a mask so much permanently impacted my lung capacity.

Pretty off topic.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Lucky said:

Pretty off topic.

This was a response to someone’s response to my on-topic comment.

ETA: on that note, all of my comments and the responses to my comments have veered way off topic, so I’ll stop responding to this thread.

Edited by ShortCutie7
ETA
Posted

I'm one of the long term (40y) survivors of HIV, thanks to clinical trials getting me through until the protease inhibitors became available. But why have I never had any opportunistic infections? I dunno. Genes? Having been nursed as an infant? Minimal exposure in transmission, just one time with someone who was exposed just one time?

Some of us who came out in the 80's are lucky to have emerged only with survivor's guilt, and although we took safe sex precautions and gave 95% of our sexual activity to video rentals, the virus caught up enough to change the course of our lives, without running us six feet under as the end game. 

"I'm older than I ever intended to be" ––  Roxy Hart, CHICAGO

Posted
5 hours ago, Pensant said:

And there was always that small cohort blessed with natural immunity.

“Natural immunity” — what exactly does that mean?  I think it’s people who contract HIV yet whose immune systems are never compromised in any way, but I’m not sure.

Posted

"HIV immunity is extremely rare, with most people susceptible to infection. However, some individuals possess natural resistance due to genetic mutations (like CCR5-Δ32) that block the virus from entering cells. While no absolute vaccine exists, research into these resistant individuals and immune responses, such as neutralizing antibodies, is ongoing."

That blurb is AI, but it references NIH documentation. There is ongoing research into factors that seem to protect individuals. From the earliest days it has been anecdotally apparent that some few individuals remained negative event after repeated, unprotected exposure to the virus. Others contract the virus but never become ill.   

Posted

Specifically Paul Michael Glaser never got it from his wife who got it from a blood transfusion, and one of their two HIV+ children lived because he had the mutation. I think he tests positive but doesn't need meds. I'm not even sure if strictly speaking he has HIV or just the antibodies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...