SometimesBi

Yes, it is! Even more so, that like myself, the bottom cums while the top is still inside him. My favorite way to bottom. 😉

Is it wrong of me to see all these hot guys, shooting or having shot such massive loads, and thinking how much I wish that could've been going up my ass instead?
This particular clip I quoted... I don't doubt I could've felt that one inside me. 😏😲

I had originally created the @Statham anonymous account to unlink the topic here from my posting history. But seeing as I fucked that up accessing Companyofmen from my phone that had a stored login for this account, that went tits up. So here we are. 
We have a date in 2024. He just took me home to Cartagena, Colombia to meet his family two weeks ago, which was a lot with my new conversational only Spanish. I'll be fluent in a few months, no sweat. You can read "Our Story" here along with "Moments" for a ton of pictures here:
www.vivirenelmomento.com  (Live In The Moment)
As part of the "Our Story" we mentioned meeting through a common friend on Instagram. That is only half the story, we aren't ready to share the entire thing just yet. Truth is the 'common friend' was an escort here in Boston that I met with a bunch of times who is his ex-boyfriend of four years. They were broken up but I did follow him on Instagram and I did see a picture of him at dinner here in Boston, and I did text the escort friend who posted it and asked who he was. Jose (my other half) came over that night and never left. lol. 
I'm also not worried about giving that site out here and disclosing the location/date. Given what I do in the real world for work, I have security on lock for the events of that day. Nobody is getting near the wedding. 😎
He still does escorting on the side. It's amazing extra money and he also has a full time job.  He uses it mostly to send money back to his family in Cartagena for random things like a new refrigerator which they recently needed.  I don't mind it, in fact he's really good. Also many clients hire for non-sexual reasons like companionship, dinner, movies, talk, whatever. Not having to do it full time because he has other work, he can afford to be selective with the clients and "jobs" he takes -- e.g., not doing anything he truly doesn't want or isn't of interest.  That will probably change when we have kids in a year or two but it works for now. 
He is 9 months older than me. He's 46 and I am 45, although it doesn't look that way. We fight over who's the actual daddy in the relationship. He thinks he is because he's older. I know I am able because of the gray hair. 
I've also worked through all the questions on the site. Many parts of the story can be read on the wedding site above. I've figured out the answers to all my questions with his help. It works. 

I concur with much of the discussion.   The client can't control the perceptions of his looks,  but he can his cleanliness.     If he is presentable,  I think professionalism should rule and do what has been requested.     

If your overnight was an incall (or other location from yours), how'd he know where your B&B was? 

If your overnight was an incall (or other location from yours), how'd he know where your B&B was? 

Getting back on topic...
I don't have tattoos, and I would never get any myself. 
And yet, I find myself enjoying seeing the art on other guys. So much so, that when I'm shopping for a pro, the presence of a few tats can be the tipping point if I can't otherwise decide between two providers. 
But I agree 100% with others ... none on the face. 

Getting back on topic...
I don't have tattoos, and I would never get any myself. 
And yet, I find myself enjoying seeing the art on other guys. So much so, that when I'm shopping for a pro, the presence of a few tats can be the tipping point if I can't otherwise decide between two providers. 
But I agree 100% with others ... none on the face. 

Thank you for saying that. I am far more satisfied bottoming for average sized pro tops. It allows me to use the muscles to do some periodic squeezing and tightening to improve his pleasure. (Large dicks just stretch me open, and I'm unable to clench/squeeze at all). 

I have.   I've been into landscaping since I was a kid and was hired to mow a client's front yard and weed his front landscaping once..   We proceeded to his bedroom after I cleaned up.   I even got a tip for extra duty.   He had family coming in and his mowing company couldn't do his yard in time.

Just read this entire topic, and this comment is what I was thinking about for the 300 vs 150 topic.
I'm a client. I'm also just a bottom. I've hired a few escorts over the years. I've also had a few random hookups.
What gives me pause at paying 300 (or even 200 for that matter) is that with a random hookup with a top, he's going to cum. Hopefully in my ass, but one way or another, he's getting off. As a bottom, that's what I like. Being part of that moment, sharing that orgasm time with him. No, not me simultaneously, just being able to watch and share him in his moment of climax. I may or may not cum after him.
When I've hired an escort, I rarely get that experience. Too many are stuck in the mode of just getting the client off. But I would easily trade my climax for his. Instead, I get faked Os. And I can tell ... either with no dick pulses/spasms inside me, or he pulls out with the condom as empty as it was going in. 😥
I'm reminded of the saying "why buy the cow when the milk is free". Because a random hookup is more satisfying than a professional? And that feels backwards. 
If I could be guaranteed to get an orgasm out of the provider, I'd happily pay up to 300. But of course we can't talk about that ahead of time, because the money is only for his time, etc. And he probably does have to save himself for the next client. 
So if I'm not going to get that experience, I just as well hire for just a massage, at half the cost. Meaning, I'm paying 150, not 300, for time with a hot guy.
Please note: I realize I'm probably in the minority here. Most clients are probably happy to just get off. Certainly client tops are. 
But maybe providers that advertise as tops, who get a client that is a bottom, might think about who would be expected to cum?? Maybe providers should have different rates if they are taking the role of top, or of bottom?
 

Just read this entire topic, and this comment is what I was thinking about for the 300 vs 150 topic.
I'm a client. I'm also just a bottom. I've hired a few escorts over the years. I've also had a few random hookups.
What gives me pause at paying 300 (or even 200 for that matter) is that with a random hookup with a top, he's going to cum. Hopefully in my ass, but one way or another, he's getting off. As a bottom, that's what I like. Being part of that moment, sharing that orgasm time with him. No, not me simultaneously, just being able to watch and share him in his moment of climax. I may or may not cum after him.
When I've hired an escort, I rarely get that experience. Too many are stuck in the mode of just getting the client off. But I would easily trade my climax for his. Instead, I get faked Os. And I can tell ... either with no dick pulses/spasms inside me, or he pulls out with the condom as empty as it was going in. 😥
I'm reminded of the saying "why buy the cow when the milk is free". Because a random hookup is more satisfying than a professional? And that feels backwards. 
If I could be guaranteed to get an orgasm out of the provider, I'd happily pay up to 300. But of course we can't talk about that ahead of time, because the money is only for his time, etc. And he probably does have to save himself for the next client. 
So if I'm not going to get that experience, I just as well hire for just a massage, at half the cost. Meaning, I'm paying 150, not 300, for time with a hot guy.
Please note: I realize I'm probably in the minority here. Most clients are probably happy to just get off. Certainly client tops are. 
But maybe providers that advertise as tops, who get a client that is a bottom, might think about who would be expected to cum?? Maybe providers should have different rates if they are taking the role of top, or of bottom?
 

Oh, one more request, but it might not be allowable except in a members only area -- during the session, did they cum? 😉  There are many providers that won't. It would be nice to know ahead of time. 

Just read this entire topic, and this comment is what I was thinking about for the 300 vs 150 topic.
I'm a client. I'm also just a bottom. I've hired a few escorts over the years. I've also had a few random hookups.
What gives me pause at paying 300 (or even 200 for that matter) is that with a random hookup with a top, he's going to cum. Hopefully in my ass, but one way or another, he's getting off. As a bottom, that's what I like. Being part of that moment, sharing that orgasm time with him. No, not me simultaneously, just being able to watch and share him in his moment of climax. I may or may not cum after him.
When I've hired an escort, I rarely get that experience. Too many are stuck in the mode of just getting the client off. But I would easily trade my climax for his. Instead, I get faked Os. And I can tell ... either with no dick pulses/spasms inside me, or he pulls out with the condom as empty as it was going in. 😥
I'm reminded of the saying "why buy the cow when the milk is free". Because a random hookup is more satisfying than a professional? And that feels backwards. 
If I could be guaranteed to get an orgasm out of the provider, I'd happily pay up to 300. But of course we can't talk about that ahead of time, because the money is only for his time, etc. And he probably does have to save himself for the next client. 
So if I'm not going to get that experience, I just as well hire for just a massage, at half the cost. Meaning, I'm paying 150, not 300, for time with a hot guy.
Please note: I realize I'm probably in the minority here. Most clients are probably happy to just get off. Certainly client tops are. 
But maybe providers that advertise as tops, who get a client that is a bottom, might think about who would be expected to cum?? Maybe providers should have different rates if they are taking the role of top, or of bottom?
 

Just read this entire topic, and this comment is what I was thinking about for the 300 vs 150 topic.
I'm a client. I'm also just a bottom. I've hired a few escorts over the years. I've also had a few random hookups.
What gives me pause at paying 300 (or even 200 for that matter) is that with a random hookup with a top, he's going to cum. Hopefully in my ass, but one way or another, he's getting off. As a bottom, that's what I like. Being part of that moment, sharing that orgasm time with him. No, not me simultaneously, just being able to watch and share him in his moment of climax. I may or may not cum after him.
When I've hired an escort, I rarely get that experience. Too many are stuck in the mode of just getting the client off. But I would easily trade my climax for his. Instead, I get faked Os. And I can tell ... either with no dick pulses/spasms inside me, or he pulls out with the condom as empty as it was going in. 😥
I'm reminded of the saying "why buy the cow when the milk is free". Because a random hookup is more satisfying than a professional? And that feels backwards. 
If I could be guaranteed to get an orgasm out of the provider, I'd happily pay up to 300. But of course we can't talk about that ahead of time, because the money is only for his time, etc. And he probably does have to save himself for the next client. 
So if I'm not going to get that experience, I just as well hire for just a massage, at half the cost. Meaning, I'm paying 150, not 300, for time with a hot guy.
Please note: I realize I'm probably in the minority here. Most clients are probably happy to just get off. Certainly client tops are. 
But maybe providers that advertise as tops, who get a client that is a bottom, might think about who would be expected to cum?? Maybe providers should have different rates if they are taking the role of top, or of bottom?
 

Just read this entire topic, and this comment is what I was thinking about for the 300 vs 150 topic.
I'm a client. I'm also just a bottom. I've hired a few escorts over the years. I've also had a few random hookups.
What gives me pause at paying 300 (or even 200 for that matter) is that with a random hookup with a top, he's going to cum. Hopefully in my ass, but one way or another, he's getting off. As a bottom, that's what I like. Being part of that moment, sharing that orgasm time with him. No, not me simultaneously, just being able to watch and share him in his moment of climax. I may or may not cum after him.
When I've hired an escort, I rarely get that experience. Too many are stuck in the mode of just getting the client off. But I would easily trade my climax for his. Instead, I get faked Os. And I can tell ... either with no dick pulses/spasms inside me, or he pulls out with the condom as empty as it was going in. 😥
I'm reminded of the saying "why buy the cow when the milk is free". Because a random hookup is more satisfying than a professional? And that feels backwards. 
If I could be guaranteed to get an orgasm out of the provider, I'd happily pay up to 300. But of course we can't talk about that ahead of time, because the money is only for his time, etc. And he probably does have to save himself for the next client. 
So if I'm not going to get that experience, I just as well hire for just a massage, at half the cost. Meaning, I'm paying 150, not 300, for time with a hot guy.
Please note: I realize I'm probably in the minority here. Most clients are probably happy to just get off. Certainly client tops are. 
But maybe providers that advertise as tops, who get a client that is a bottom, might think about who would be expected to cum?? Maybe providers should have different rates if they are taking the role of top, or of bottom?
 

Just read this entire topic, and this comment is what I was thinking about for the 300 vs 150 topic.
I'm a client. I'm also just a bottom. I've hired a few escorts over the years. I've also had a few random hookups.
What gives me pause at paying 300 (or even 200 for that matter) is that with a random hookup with a top, he's going to cum. Hopefully in my ass, but one way or another, he's getting off. As a bottom, that's what I like. Being part of that moment, sharing that orgasm time with him. No, not me simultaneously, just being able to watch and share him in his moment of climax. I may or may not cum after him.
When I've hired an escort, I rarely get that experience. Too many are stuck in the mode of just getting the client off. But I would easily trade my climax for his. Instead, I get faked Os. And I can tell ... either with no dick pulses/spasms inside me, or he pulls out with the condom as empty as it was going in. 😥
I'm reminded of the saying "why buy the cow when the milk is free". Because a random hookup is more satisfying than a professional? And that feels backwards. 
If I could be guaranteed to get an orgasm out of the provider, I'd happily pay up to 300. But of course we can't talk about that ahead of time, because the money is only for his time, etc. And he probably does have to save himself for the next client. 
So if I'm not going to get that experience, I just as well hire for just a massage, at half the cost. Meaning, I'm paying 150, not 300, for time with a hot guy.
Please note: I realize I'm probably in the minority here. Most clients are probably happy to just get off. Certainly client tops are. 
But maybe providers that advertise as tops, who get a client that is a bottom, might think about who would be expected to cum?? Maybe providers should have different rates if they are taking the role of top, or of bottom?
 

Instead of top/bottom how about “give/get” for activities. For blowjob, rimjob, f@cking, edging, bondage, toys, FF - it would provide more detail of what the provider actually enjoyed, rather than just relying on the ad that says “fully vers” when he is not and knows it.
Still, questions remain about role of “top/bottom” in rimming - give/get seems clearer, for example. And when it comes to “taking charge”, isn’t a bossy bottom actually the top? 
 

working for me.  But my browser has starting to check if it is safe website before going to it.

And now that we’ve had a chance to get that off of our chests…. 
As per usual… some like the change, some don’t, and some don’t care.  And we’re already seeing some individuals trying to push buttons. 

I’m headed to bed now. Tomorrow (or later today in reality), if the snipping does not stop, there will be some folks who can enjoy a few days on timeout. 

Until then… love you all… sleep well… and good night. 

About 25 years ago I flirted with a cute guy who worked at the main Nordstrom in Seattle. I saw him a week later at Seattle Pride and we slept together that night. That was fun!
Beyond that, I’ve done my share of flirting with Nordstrom sales guys over the years from Vancouver to Atlanta!

Know your body. Learn your natural elimination cycle. Pay attention to what foods speed it up, slow it down, and alter your diet and add fiber supplements to add predictability. Input affects output. 
Douche as needed, well ahead. Check before showering by inserting a slender dildo a little longer than the size of whatever you plan to encounter. It will act as Last Call to dalliers and lurkers. 
It’s kinda like housekeeping. If you have one person stopping by, you won’t bother cleaning the entire house. If you’re having a party or an overnight guest, a full-house/deeper cleaning might be in order, should they wander into seldom-used places. 🤣

If it happens again, let me know.  But given the search index has not changed at **ALL**, I'm almost willing to bet it's a context issue.  If it happens again, do that same exact search from the home page OR from the full search page https://www.companyofmen.org/search.  
On a side note...  I have fixed the issue with mobile devices not showing search context correctly.  
 

Not sure why, but this clinical description just makes me smile 😊 ☺ 😄 😁 

Fairly new here, so might have missed something. 
I went to The Deli to see what I could find for local providers (Seattle area). I see there are 1440 PAGES of topics. 😲 And, at least on my phone, I cannot see a search button. Please tell me I just missed it... 🤔