Asterisk

Evidently, they don't want to LOOK at it, they want to FEEL it. Tell a straight man he *should* desire tits A, B, or C, instead of lusting after DDD. @Okashii81's analogy is spot on. It's no more "disrespectful" than a client disappointed by a provider using 10-year-old pics, or photos of someone who "appears similar." He's not searching for a beautiful soul, for the Dalai Lama. He's looking for someone who fulfills his fantasies -- not yours, or mine -- his. Hook-up apps are rife with disembodied cock pics, vainly trying to mislead others about what they'll find after the deception is revealed. As if every user doesn't have a dick, and can judge proportions (or surmise why they've been cropped out) on his own. If you don't have what he's looking for, you two aren't a match -- for amateurs as well as professionals. Not every two people are. Lying or misleading won't change the other's desire, just leave him disappointed by the bait-and-switch.

He posted one on Twitter on July 6 https://x.com/angelo_the3boyz?s=20

Thanks for proving the point. The question remains: "Based on what experience or information? Offer an example or three where this has happened." Or just delete the homophobic BS comment, since you're talking out of your ass.

This is complete nonsense. Based on what experience or information of yours? Offer an example or three where this has happened.

100%. But it can help build a baseline, and then fact check and investigate further.

"Please do a 50-state statutory review and build a table showing, for every state, first adult-purchaser offense → misdemeanor/felony → felony class → maximum imprisonment → effective date."

I asked AI to do a 50-state review, and it found 7: Arizona, Illinois, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Texas. NC for soliciting; Illinois for patronizing. (Texas prosecuted about 1700 johns in 2022 and again in 2023.)

Good luck. Looks like he was last on Dec 18 2025.

Is this on his Twitter or Instagram or something?

Pics that are literally a decade old might call for a refresh? He was sexy in 2016!

Help us out here, please. You've tracked this profile, and noticed that the ad, photos and name have all changed over a two week period? And now ask whether anyone might actually have met this creation? Which version? You might already know the answer.

If a spambot could introduce a topic, this would be it.

Bruno's appears current again, and he checked in yesterday.

Even the IG is only a month old. 🤣