Cade Maddox on Playgirl

[Trick]

Did he ever make a video with a woman?

https://www.out.com/celebs/gay-adult-star-cade-maddox#toggle-gdpr

[maninsoma]

1 hour ago, Trick said:

Did he ever make a video with a woman?

https://www.out.com/celebs/gay-adult-star-cade-maddox#toggle-gdpr

I have seen him in some scenes with trans men, but not with a female identified performer.

[Danny-Darko]

Since Playgirl came on the market, MANY gay men have posed nude for them throughout the decades. It seems there are far more gay men willing to pose nude than straight men. They are published under a different name and most straights wouldn't know a gay porn star if they came across one. Nothing new.

[+ ApexNomad]

1 hour ago, Danny-Darko said:

Since Playgirl came on the market, MANY gay men have posed nude for them throughout the decades. It seems there are far more gay men willing to pose nude than straight men. They are published under a different name and most straights wouldn't know a gay porn star if they came across one. Nothing new.

Yes. Playgirl was actually aimed at women, not gay men. Basically the female counterpart to Playboy. It just ended up with a big gay male readership because there weren’t many mainstream outlets featuring male nudity. While not labeled, many men who posed were gay (or later identified as gay).

[d.anders]

1 hour ago, Danny-Darko said:

It seems there are far more gay men willing to pose nude than straight men.

What's the incentive for straight guys to pose nude there? Does Playgirl of today have any money? Do they have clout? What is there to gain for a straight guy?

[+ ApexNomad]

4 minutes ago, d.anders said:

What's the incentive for straight guys to pose nude there? Does Playgirl of today have any money? Do they have clout? What is there to gain for a straight guy?

I think the incentive used to be exposure and money, especially back in the day when there were fewer avenues for visibility. Today, though, I’m not sure there’s much clout or payoff unless someone is already leaning into that kind of branding. Plus now we have the internet so print means nothing. There’s also still a cultural difference. Male nudity has and will likely always read more aggressively or sexually than female nudity, so the upside for straight men isn’t always obvious.

[d.anders]

3 minutes ago, ApexNomad said:

Plus now we have the internet so print means nothing.

I didn't realize they resumed the print edition in 2020. I hear former archived issues are more valuable than anything they have today.

5 minutes ago, ApexNomad said:

Male nudity has and will likely always read more aggressively or sexually than female nudity, so the upside for straight men isn’t always obvious.

I remember when Justin Bieber complained to Ellen DeGeneres about the paparazzi capturing him naked. He said to her how disappointed he was that he wasn't able to keep that part of him private. He shrugged his shoulders and said, "There's nothing I can do about it now," but I kind of understood what he meant, and I was sad for him. Once your naked self gets exposed to the world, there is no taking that back. The public gets to own the visual, forever.

[+ claym]

This is a bit off-topic and I am learning about him for the first time here.  Other than a big tool and a sculpted.body, his face is ordinary and to my eyes unattractive.  Perhaps in an interview and less produced surroundings he comes across differently.

[wsc]

13 hours ago, Danny-Darko said:

Since Playgirl came on the market, MANY gay men have posed nude for them throughout the decades. It seems there are far more gay men willing to pose nude than straight men. They are published under a different name and most straights wouldn't know a gay porn star if they came across one. Nothing new.

If a straight man actually came across a gay porn star, shouldn't it raise at least a little suspicion? After all, as a gay man I sometimes pay good money to do exactly that!😋

[+ JEC]

13 hours ago, d.anders said:

I didn't realize they resumed the print edition in 2020. I hear former archived issues are more valuable than anything they have today.

I remember when Justin Bieber complained to Ellen DeGeneres about the paparazzi capturing him naked. He said to her how disappointed he was that he wasn't able to keep that part of him private. He shrugged his shoulders and said, "There's nothing I can do about it now," but I kind of understood what he meant, and I was sad for him. Once your naked self gets exposed to the world, there is no taking that back. The public gets to own the visual, forever.

I for one was NOT disappointed that the paparazzi capture the Biebs in the buff 😛😜

[d.anders]

31 minutes ago, JEC said:

I for one was NOT disappointed that the paparazzi capture the Biebs in the buff

I thought he looked sexy as hell, and I was certainly glad I had the chance to see it all. However, the photos were taken without his permission, and that has to be an awful feeling. I imagine for him it feels like a personal violation.

Edited 4 hours ago by d.anders

[maninsoma]

10 hours ago, claym said:

This is a bit off-topic and I am learning about him for the first time here.  Other than a big tool and a sculpted.body, his face is ordinary and to my eyes unattractive.  Perhaps in an interview and less produced surroundings he comes across differently.

I know that some people never found Cade Maddox's face particularly attractive, but I used to think he was hot.  I'm not sure what he's been doing the past year or two, though, but his face has changed in a way that makes me wonder whether he's had "work done" or is using fillers.

[marylander1940]

13 hours ago, claym said:

This is a bit off-topic and I am learning about him for the first time here.  Other than a big tool and a sculpted.body, his face is ordinary and to my eyes unattractive.  Perhaps in an interview and less produced surroundings he comes across differently.

You forgot about his ass.... he was 3 out of 4, even if some don't like his face, he's hotter than most of us at his age.

 

Edited 1 hour ago by marylander1940

[Trick]

1 hour ago, maninsoma said:

I know that some people never found Cade Maddox's face particularly attractive, but I used to think he was hot.  I'm not sure what he's been doing the past year or two, though, but his face has changed in a way that makes me wonder whether he's had "work done" or is using fillers.

I’ve seen the changes on his face.  I booked him several times when he was just starting, initially when he was still with Jason Sparks and then on his own.  That was when his rate was $165.  He looked a lot better in those days.

[maninsoma]

38 minutes ago, Trick said:

I’ve seen the changes on his face.  I booked him several times when he was just starting, initially when he was still with Jason Sparks and then on his own.  That was when his rate was $165.  He looked a lot better in those days.

Depending on one's preferences, a younger man is always going to "look better."  I'd say that's true for me when speaking about, say, a man in his 60s versus his 20s or 30s; I'm going to prefer the younger version of him.  What's going on with Cade, though, doesn't seem to be just getting a bit less attractive due to age.  He just looks a bit odd in a way that I don't think getting older explains.

[marylander1940]

 

Edited 14 minutes ago by marylander1940