Jump to content

Pathetic double standard in "coverage" of Olympic athletes.


Recommended Posts

Posted

So far, I've seen mainstream so-called professional journalists write articles about male participants with big penises and plump asses. These include close-up shots of the dicks or butts, and no regard or care at all as to how inappropriate this is - because if this was done with female participants with huge breasts or shapely behinds, the masses would get unglued with rage. Why is this at all okay to sexualize men in this fashion? That's not why they're Olympians. 

Of course, you'll have individuals on social media making comments, which is unsurprising. For news outlets to zone in on it, that's what I find bothersome. Athletes tend to have great bodies. We all can see this. Focus on what they're doing in their competition is the journalist's job, I thought. Not about his third leg or thick cakes. Or both. 

 

Posted

It’s been years since I spent time in grocery store lines, but I recall that many of the magazines there featured tasteful nude olympian issues.  Those athletes didn’t look like they minded the open viewing of their physiques and acknowledgement that their training created outstanding results 

IMG_4128.png

IMG_4127.jpeg

IMG_4124.png

IMG_4125.jpeg

Posted

I’m not the athlete that I was when I was younger and was never even close to olympian level.  But a huge part of why I was a competitive runner and martial arts guy was to have a physique that I enjoyed showing off.  I wouldn’t want my genitals discussed on broadcast TV, but I loved the attention to my musculature.

ESPN’s Bodies issue is fantastic.  I love the range of athletes that they portray:  sumo wrestlers, pro golfers from the seniors division, race horse jockeys are just. some of the widely varied athletes that they portray in a body-positive manner.

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, viewing ownly said:

...These include close-up shots of the dicks or butts, and no regard or care at all as to how inappropriate this is - because if this was done with female participants with huge breasts or shapely behinds, the masses would get unglued with rage. Why is this at all okay to sexualize men in this fashion?...

I recall seeing an exhibit on swimming races across the 22 miles of ocean from Catalina Island to Los Angeles, and it featured a debate in the 1920s on whether to allow females to enter the competition.  Back then, the swimmers swam nude to decrease drag and were greased up to retain body heat.  The debate was that while it was acceptable for the public and newspapers to gather on the shore to celebrate and photograph the male swimmers who completed the swim, it would be obscene for the public to view and photograph a female swimmer emerging nude from the water.  The Los Angeles Times asked the public what they thought at the time, and the overwhelming majority wrote to allow women to compete nude and that any athlete's nude body (regardless of sex) can be appreciated and admired without being sexual.

Now we're upset that the public is admiring the bodies of the covered male athletes!  My, how we've regressed.

http://www.laalmanac.com/sports/sp720.php

 

Edited by Vegas_Millennial
Posted
1 hour ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

Both sexes should compete nude, as all Olympic games were prior to 1896.

OIP(17).webp.ce460a6fb18d490f6eb402939a3ea6c7.webp

Keep in mind - in the original olympics of ancient times, small and compact genitalia was fashionable so things would flop too much.      I have no problem with nudity and given the choice, I'd be commando all the time.   But when I'm running, I flop so much that it hurts!

What's the word for "jockstrap" in german?    KeepsDemFrumFloppin

 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, PhileasFogg said:

Keep in mind - in the original olympics of ancient times, small and compact genitalia was fashionable so things would flop too much...

I took these photos when I visited the original Olympic stadium in Athens.  One side features a young athlete with compact, flaccid genitalia.  The reverse side features an older man, presumably the athlete's coach or mentor, with slightly larger, erect genitalia.

IMG_20241007_134346615.thumb.jpg.9cec100d60afb96858ee9fe6d6ff965b.jpg

IMG_20241007_134252477.thumb.jpg.1d0fdc0352444dc79c454b84a5386aa6.jpg

Edited by Vegas_Millennial
Posted
18 hours ago, viewing ownly said:

So far, I've seen mainstream so-called professional journalists write articles about male participants with big penises and plump asses. These include close-up shots of the dicks or butts, and no regard or care at all as to how inappropriate this is - because if this was done with female participants with huge breasts or shapely behinds, the masses would get unglued with rage. Why is this at all okay to sexualize men in this fashion? That's not why they're Olympians. 

Of course, you'll have individuals on social media making comments, which is unsurprising. For news outlets to zone in on it, that's what I find bothersome. Athletes tend to have great bodies. We all can see this. Focus on what they're doing in their competition is the journalist's job, I thought. Not about his third leg or thick cakes. Or both. 

 

To summarize, you are a gay man who is upset that professional journalists focus in too much on Olympic male athletes' big penises and plump asses?
You are a gay man and you are in a tizzy over the fact that there are too many TV close-ups of their dicks and butts?
This must be a first.

Bozo can't get enough of it.... wish there was more. A lot more!
The highlight of the summer Olympics for Bozo is watching the swimmers and divers in their skimpy Speedos, and the pole vaulters and hunky gymnasts in their tank tops. The more muscle and flesh.... the better! These guys worked their young lifetimes practicing their sport and perfecting their bodies in pursuit of Olympic Gold. The least we could do as gay men is to admire and appreciate!

Note to TV cameras: Please continue to ZOOM in on their bodies - dicks, asses, muscles, etc

BTC
🤡

Posted
2 hours ago, BOZO T CLOWN said:

You are a gay man and you are in a tizzy over the fact that there are too many TV close-ups of their dicks and butts?
This must be a first.

Bozo can't get enough of it.... wish there was more. A lot more!

I think the original poster must be upset that he hasn't noticed as many female athletes photographed in their skintight attire showing off their breasts and butts.  The title starts "Double Standard", so we should be advocating for equal representation of the female form in Olympic journalism.  However, I believe part of the observation might be personal bias:  as gay men, we are more prone to notice attractive fit athletic men than we are to notice fit athletic women.  I'm sure if we ask a straight man, he'd be happy to point out the abundance of sexy female athletes in photographs and journalism.

Posted
5 hours ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

I think the original poster must be upset that he hasn't noticed as many female athletes photographed in their skintight attire showing off their breasts and butts.  The title starts "Double Standard", so we should be advocating for equal representation of the female form in Olympic journalism.  However, I believe part of the observation might be personal bias:  as gay men, we are more prone to notice attractive fit athletic men than we are to notice fit athletic women.  I'm sure if we ask a straight man, he'd be happy to point out the abundance of sexy female athletes in photographs and journalism.

As a bisexual man, I’ll just point to women’s olympic beach volleyball.  Those are some scantly clad athletic women!

Posted
14 hours ago, BOZO T CLOWN said:

To summarize, you are a gay man who is upset that professional journalists focus in too much on Olympic male athletes' big penises and plump asses?
You are a gay man and you are in a tizzy over the fact that there are too many TV close-ups of their dicks and butts?

 

Agreed!

And don't you forget about women watching sports because of these reasons!

To some, there's always a reason to complain! 

emma-roberts-tantrum.gif

Posted
On 2/19/2026 at 1:44 AM, viewing ownly said:

So far, I've seen mainstream so-called professional journalists write articles about male participants with big penises and plump asses. These include close-up shots of the dicks or butts, and no regard or care at all as to how inappropriate this is - because if this was done with female participants with huge breasts or shapely behinds, the masses would get unglued with rage. Why is this at all okay to sexualize men in this fashion? That's not why they're Olympians. 

Of course, you'll have individuals on social media making comments, which is unsurprising. For news outlets to zone in on it, that's what I find bothersome. Athletes tend to have great bodies. We all can see this. Focus on what they're doing in their competition is the journalist's job, I thought. Not about his third leg or thick cakes. Or both. 

 

Would it be too much to ask for you to provide some links to the images that have outraged you, so that others might (or might not) share your disgust?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...