Jump to content

KensingtonHomo

+ Supporters
  • Posts

    883
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KensingtonHomo

  1. 7 hours ago, NYXboy said:

    Isn't including the transport fee into the rate the same as covering the uber?

    Not really. The provider can estimate what transportation will cost and include it, but it doesn't involve me using my account and if the rates go up because its busy, that's not on us. 

    Honestly, I find the "send me an uber" thing silly as there are plenty of providers who just hop on the train, ride their bikes over, and some have cars. 

  2. 8 minutes ago, Simon Suraci said:

    The following is in response to @KensingtonHomo’s comment regarding masseurs.

    Regarding the BJ, it’s perfectly reasonable for anyone to charge you for sex work (and that is what it is). It doesn’t matter who is giving or receiving. It’s all the same.

    I agree with you. I would never pressure someone to do something they aren't comfortable with. This happened when I was new to this, and now I am very explicit about what I expect and what I'll pay for it. This provider was charging the upper end of what is customary in NYC (which usually includes oral), so getting close to the end and throwing the upcharge in feels unfair. 

  3. On 2/12/2024 at 4:47 PM, Your Man in Arlington said:

    A few interesting answers in his profile:

    Style: Daddy

    Only 4 I am into's: Anal • Daddy • Rimming • Role Play

    And he possibly found at least 6 guys to shell out $1k or more?

    Any reasonably attractive man in his 40s or 50s will be swarmed by young men who look just like this on Grindr. Me and my husband could have a few a week if we were interested in twinks or twunks. We're not but that doesn't stop them from blowing up our chats. 

    Of course, the primary thing we pay for is convenience. I have no desire to get into endless chats with flaky 20-somethings. 

  4. 3 hours ago, viewing ownly said:

    I never implied at all that being a bottom is weak, nor ugly. I clearly indicated that it seems that many of those who have put muscle on their frames aren't willing to be bottoms any longer.

    Being skinny isn't "ugly", but being fit is more attractive to look at for most, myself included.

    In my experience, bottoms and tops come in all shapes and sizes. If you're talking about providers, I suspect what you're seeing is market dynamics. The former twinks who marketed themselves as bottoms, can probably command more clients and money as tops. Me and my husband tend to hire verse and tops, simply because I'm a bottom and my husband has no desire for two bottoms. 

  5. I agree with those who've said he's mostly on RM to promote his Only Fans. I wouldn't even pay a porn star $1,000. 

    There's a provider we've seen a few times and we REALLY enjoy. But since he's been doing porn, I find myself less interested in hiring him.

    I'm unsure why because I don't think he would charge us more. 

    I also don't like OF as a medium. I've tried to follow a few guys on there but I don't find it worth the cost. 

  6. On 1/29/2024 at 1:03 PM, pubic_assistance said:

    Which is only fair.

    Dealing with the general public and gentlemen walking in your door with no idea how repulsive they may be...you SHOULD have some ability as a provider to maintain some limits about how much poor personal hygiene and health you are willing to overlook.

    I agree with you on hygiene but I wonder if that has anything to do with vague marketing. Looking through Rentmen, some guys are very explicit. If a provider wants to curate their clientele for escort purposes, they should stick to Rentmasseur and then let those they're interested in know they're open to more. 

  7. We're in a similar spot. While I understand inflation and don't begrudge providers making what they can, the jump from $300-$350 an hour to $400-$500 an hour in the past 12-18 months has slowed our hiring. We're not rich, so hiring is an indulgence. Plus, as a couple, we prefer to hire for at least two hours, so we're looking at $700-$800 for a single session. So I find we're much choosier with a new provider and seeing the guys we like when our schedules all line up, which is another obstacle. 

  8. 2 minutes ago, GlamNYC said:

    (1) are you asian? (2) did you see him in the last couple of weeks? 

    I am not Asian. And while I haven't hired him in the past few weeks, we have interacted. 

    I'm not doubting your experience. I've had bad experiences with escorts that other people think are amazing. It's just 180 degrees from my own, so I'm curious why Erik would behave this way. 

  9. 9 hours ago, GlamNYC said:

    If you are his type, I guess. If you aren’t, it’s a different story. So, “Asian, fats, and fems,” IMHO are better off finding another provider. 

    I don't want to invalidate your experience but I've seen Erik many times, and I'm a very femme person and was about 60 lbs overweight at that time. So it seems unlikely that if he found you unattractive and your interaction with him left you with low self-esteem, it was because you are femme or overweight. 

    Either way, I'm sorry you had this experience. 

  10. 50 minutes ago, Coolwave35 said:

    It’s hard to describe but fascinating too because the impact on the market is palpable. 

    Is the impact that people are charging more? There was such variety in what you're paying, I can't tell. 

  11. On a serious note, in almost five year of pursuing this hobby - using primarily Rent.men in at least four countries - we've never had a legal issue. We do what @pubic_assistance and @BuffaloKyle have suggested, which is stick guys who are well-reviewed and have been mentioned on here. Occasionally, someone will not have been discussed here, but if they have what seems like a lot of legitimate reviews on RM, we'll go ahead. We've had a couple of duds but overall our experiences have been good to great. 

×
×
  • Create New...