KensingtonHomo

Based on those ads, I believe they mean various kinks.

Yikes. I'm not filling out a Google form. LOL

I just want to note that this poster is brand new and has only posted on this thread. Feels odd.

New York is a one-party consent state. As long as one person knows they’re being recorded, it’s legal.

That seems odd to me. He’s been very professional and polite in our interactions. Not pushy. No ghosting. He does check Rentmen so maybe send him a message there.

This is insane. Was this for a massage or escort session? If it was the latter, I wouldn’t hire that person again. If it’s the former; you’re paying three times more than necessary to get a good erotic massage.

We saw Marcus tonight. He was wonderful. He’s a great conversationalist, very handsome in person, and very sensual and empathic sexually. Me and my husband had him over and he could not have been a better third. He was attentive to both of us. His body is gorgeous and furry. But most importantly he is a very genuine man who clearly enjoys his work.

What does being a "jock" have to do with masculinity? There are women jocks, men jocks and everything in between.

If you’re going to him, what’s the risk? It seems he’s giving you his location so the risk is his, not yours. He probably figured it would be less invasive than asking for your address.

We generally host and prefer it. The distinction is that as a couple we outnumber the provider. That doesn't mean nothing bad could happen but I am generally concerned that the provider is comfortable. That said, I do think it is wise for anyone hosting a provider, especially for the first time, to take some precautions.

Sadly, the anti-trafficking laws (which do nothing for people being trafficked) ensure that no US-based publication will do escort ads as long as they're in effect.

I'm sure some people just move on but I'm much more interested in what a provider says about themselves than their photos. The one rule I rarely break is that I won't meet without seeing a face pic.

I can see yours. I guess some providers are putting some as private.

I'm confused. I'm a paying member of RM and the Premium photos are locked to me. I assumed escorts were doing this to keep "shoppers" from seeing the goods without interaction.

As a client, I like hearing from escorts who I'm not likely to hire - mostly due to geography - about what they like or dislike about clients. I think it makes me a better client.

I'm just using this as an example not to drag Bozo per se, but I find it ironic that so many clients who regularly complain about providers on here - often going over the same topics (deposits, looks, flakiness, scheduling drama) again and again. Why do clients get to hem and haw over the same issues over and over again, but a provider who is dealing with a difficult environment gets blamed? I've mentioned before how often I find comments about providers on here dehumanizing. This is another example. If you don't want to engage with Jarrod's posts, you can simply add him to your block list. Coming to his threads and telling him to quit or stop complaining is just nasty and unnecessary. The majority of Americans are unhappy in their jobs. And even those who like or love what they do have bad times and need to vent. Why is Jarrod not afforded the same latitude? Job unhappiness is at a staggering all-time high, according to Gallup WWW.CNBC.COM Workers are unhappy and disengaged, to a staggering degree, according to Gallup, and it's a big issue for...

Yes, I've seen this not only among masseurs I see but also masseurs advertising lack a package rate (3 massages for X price). I suspect they're trying to drum up business like any service provider.

This is what I've most experienced and appreciated from providers we see regularly. Either keeping the price the same when they're charging new clients more or not watching the clock as closely, e.g. letting an hour-long massage session go into 1:15 or coming over for 2 hours and staying 2.5. And we tip a bit more in those instances.

"Innocent until proven guilty" is a legal standard, not a cultural one. The Courts and a jury, if one is involved, need to maintain a presumption of innocence; we do not. It's shocking that you can see all the men who got away with being predators for decades (Weinstein, Cosby, Epstein) and continue to ask why women didn't come forward sooner. What Me Too changed is that survivors feel more confident coming forward because doing so will no longer destroy their lives and careers. When I was sexually assaulted at 16, there wasn't much evidence left and no witnesses. The world was much more homophobic then, so what would happen if I came forward? I would have been dismissed as countless women were for most of modern history.

I don’t believe he’s accused of human trafficking like Tate but we’ll see.

This is ridiculous. Most sexual assaults are not reported let alone prosecuted, including mine. Watching a bunch of gay men claim women are destroying the careers of men (I can count on one hand the number who’ve faced real consequences) is just gross. There is extensive data going back decades showing how widespread sexual harassment and assault are. Brand’s accusers are all women he worked with where he had a lot of power. And other people are coming forward to say this was an open secret for years.

Only on here.

I’ve seen one guy without a face pic bc he was so well regarded on here. And he’s become one my favorite regulars. This was for massage. Not sure I’d do it for an escort session.

I don’t lick anyone’s armpits. I get that some guys are super into them, but they don’t hold any appeal to me.

Uhhhh, I never said I wanted to "dictate" or "change" a provider's grooming habits. I was looking for a way to broach what a provider typically does in terms of grooming because I've hired guys whose pictures show them with hair and they should up bald. If they prefer to have no pubic hair, they're not the provider for me.