KensingtonHomo

I’ve always had a big family so I’m very busy with family during the holidays. But I think providers who see clients who may not have family or close friends to spend the holidays with are doing a lovely service.

Why would he do that? Why do your friends and family believe him? Why not think he just grabbed your pic of LinkedIn?

He’s not my type but I always appreciate knowing people who under perform.

I don’t see why you have to be so judgmental. Some people live out loud and don’t care what people know about them.

Don’t sluts fuck a lot for free?

I think requiring a face pic to meet is silly for a masseur. It probably leads to them having fewer clients overall. And if people are anti-social media or keeping their lives very discrete, I think we should all be supportive of that. My issue is with guys who are all over Instagram and everywhere else but scoff at sending one to a provider, particularly one who has lots of pictures on their profile.

I don't understand the caution here. If you send a pic, what's going to happen? If it's a G-rated pic, there are likely several of you on social media that anyone could download or screen grab. A naughty masseur having one doesn't mean anything. Do you think they can prove you sent it? If so, who would care? If you're someone who avoids social media altogether, then I can understand it. But there are so many pictures of me on the Internet, I would say, "I guess they downloaded that from my Facebook profile," and move on... If I'm going to a provider's home (or hotel), I generally offer to send a face pic so they know who is showing up.

It's quite sad to me that despite doing porn and sex work, he had so little to show for it. It's a powerful reminder to clients that providers are people; some who enjoy their work; others who feel that they have no choice.

I agree. I think we need sex workers to run for office and win. There are a few who have run. So I wouldn't assume that will prohibit you. It may also depend on where you're planning to run. In NYC it probably won't stop you but in Texas, it would.

We've had a couple of second times that were not as good as the first, but none were terrible. Generally, the more comfortable we become with a provider, the better the encounters are. I suspect, as others have mentioned, that the excitement of a first encounter may hide a lack of genuine chemistry. We do have some regulars but we usually see them a few times a year. I think if we saw a provider once or twice a month, it might lose the thrill.

We've seen him a few times and he's great.

I don’t mind if a provider reaches out to me. But I would generally prefer to reach out myself.

That's hilarious. At least he's not being explicit.

Based on those ads, I believe they mean various kinks.

Yikes. I'm not filling out a Google form. LOL

I just want to note that this poster is brand new and has only posted on this thread. Feels odd.

New York is a one-party consent state. As long as one person knows they’re being recorded, it’s legal.

That seems odd to me. He’s been very professional and polite in our interactions. Not pushy. No ghosting. He does check Rentmen so maybe send him a message there.

This is insane. Was this for a massage or escort session? If it was the latter, I wouldn’t hire that person again. If it’s the former; you’re paying three times more than necessary to get a good erotic massage.

We saw Marcus tonight. He was wonderful. He’s a great conversationalist, very handsome in person, and very sensual and empathic sexually. Me and my husband had him over and he could not have been a better third. He was attentive to both of us. His body is gorgeous and furry. But most importantly he is a very genuine man who clearly enjoys his work.

What does being a "jock" have to do with masculinity? There are women jocks, men jocks and everything in between.

If you’re going to him, what’s the risk? It seems he’s giving you his location so the risk is his, not yours. He probably figured it would be less invasive than asking for your address.

We generally host and prefer it. The distinction is that as a couple we outnumber the provider. That doesn't mean nothing bad could happen but I am generally concerned that the provider is comfortable. That said, I do think it is wise for anyone hosting a provider, especially for the first time, to take some precautions.

Sadly, the anti-trafficking laws (which do nothing for people being trafficked) ensure that no US-based publication will do escort ads as long as they're in effect.

I'm sure some people just move on but I'm much more interested in what a provider says about themselves than their photos. The one rule I rarely break is that I won't meet without seeing a face pic.