mike carey

And no doubt you have one to give in return?

I assume this is a typo, but on this board you can't be too sure. 😉

☝
Reminds me of King Henry VIII's Tudor warship,  the Mary Rose. Built in Portsmouth England in 1511, it sank in 1545 and was raised from the seabed in 1982.
Today, visitors to the Portsmouth Historic Dockyard can experience the preserved portion of the ship,  and thousands of artifacts.
My brother recently visited there.
 

I feel like you gotta just book a longer session. Even on a "slow day" you never know when another client of his may book a slot directly after yours, which would mean he'll have a hard out in order to be ready for that next client. You can't really ask him to put more time between his sessions, it's up to his time management and financial reasoning for how many sessions he does a day and how closely he does or doesn't book them to each other. The only part you can control is how long your session is.

That reminds me of the Vasa, the Swedish warship that sank on its launching 500 or so years ago. It’s was recovered in the 1960’s and I saw it in Stockholm shortly after. Today it’s in a museum .

Shouldn't this be in the 'Cute Critters' thread?

My biggest cooking fail is every time I give it a go.

@Becket the first time I heard that chant I thought it was an AI construct. Maybe it is ....
Or maybe not.

Was pleasantly surprised at how good a Frontier flight was.  Plane was a newer model and comfortable.  Flight left on time, landed early.  No frills, but I wasn't expecting any. 

This is a great relief. Now I know where to go when I am, inevitably, next discombobulated.

That's not unusual, people often don't pause to understand the actual costs of what they are doing, they focus on a headline number and decide that it is 'unreasonable'. Sometimes you need to take a step back, or several, and look dispassionately at what's in front of you.
In April, I booked a flight from NYC to Boston (train fares were not cheap) and only then checked, and could have booked an award seat on the same flight for a number of miles I could have bought the same day for less (and which I had in my account anyway and had acquired for even less). In November I got it right, a flight from PHX to LAX would have cost me over $AU500 (AA prices my fares in AUD because I use an AU credit card), but were available for 9k Qantas miles, which was at most $AU180 to me.
I wouldn't dream of suggesting that 30 hours behind the wheel might be more pleasant than a Spirit flight, and nor could I guarantee that airline miles might be a solution. Sometimes paying the 'unreasonable' fare might be the most sensible thing to do, and the one that is actually the most cost effective.

You haven't lost your flair, @Tygerscent!

You haven't lost your flair, @Tygerscent!

That thought had crossed my mind when I read your earlier post. And I won't need to risk Spirit.

That's not unusual, people often don't pause to understand the actual costs of what they are doing, they focus on a headline number and decide that it is 'unreasonable'. Sometimes you need to take a step back, or several, and look dispassionately at what's in front of you.
In April, I booked a flight from NYC to Boston (train fares were not cheap) and only then checked, and could have booked an award seat on the same flight for a number of miles I could have bought the same day for less (and which I had in my account anyway and had acquired for even less). In November I got it right, a flight from PHX to LAX would have cost me over $AU500 (AA prices my fares in AUD because I use an AU credit card), but were available for 9k Qantas miles, which was at most $AU180 to me.
I wouldn't dream of suggesting that 30 hours behind the wheel might be more pleasant than a Spirit flight, and nor could I guarantee that airline miles might be a solution. Sometimes paying the 'unreasonable' fare might be the most sensible thing to do, and the one that is actually the most cost effective.

Interesting comments on here regarding duration and activity in the session. If one is thinking in terms of sex as being the actual act of fucking and cuming, and that act is the focus or objective of the session, and it is rushed towards in an hour session then I would say one is missing an opportunity. That kind of session describes a random hookup app encounter, which is fine but do you really want to pay an expert (a sex worker) good money for what you could get for free on Sniffies? (Not Grindr because that’s impossible to use now 😂). 
The old adage ‘it’s the journey not the destination’ comes to mind. The journey makes the destination. The journey is the event and it can take as long as you like if your mind is adjusted to consider it as such. Fucking and cuming could be part of the journey, at any point, or not be part of it atall. If there is a destination to the session then it’s to feel connection and intimacy, to be desired and to desire.

Yesterday I saw a client for a two hour session on the floor. He lost track of time, I almost did (we ran over by 20 minutes). There was no concern about how to fill the time…it just happened. I know his boundaries, but within that frame we paint a picture. He’s a regular client (regular is a few times a year - he lives abroad). Each visit is the same but different. 
I get some clients asking for half hour sessions. Sorry I don’t do them, those are not worth buying. An hour is the minimum but it feels rushed sometimes. I understand it’s a cost thing, hence why I offer an hour as minimum session but my advice is consider a longer session and to think of it differently. Not as a way to get off…but as a way to connect and discover. That way the time is never long enough. You’ll go back to him for subsequent sessions which are just like moving to the next chapter in the book you can’t put down. 
Did I say my client above is 80? He’s still on the journey of discovery. It’s fabulous isn’t it 🙂. 

 

If you want to continue wider conversations, I've started this thread.
 

He has a Greek phone number and lists Greek as a language, so that would track (proximity rather than affinity!).

Shouldn't this be in the 'Cute Critters' thread?

People do swim in the harbour, there are popular beaches and swimming areas, and it is safe, generally, but yes, there are sharks and attacks even deaths are not unknown. As in most things, safe and unsafe are not binary alternatives.

The Opera House and the bridge are the iconic images but their prominence obscures that the harbour itself is the real star. I find the bridge in the foreground, the Gladesville Bridge, to be quite spectacular in its own way.

If that's the experience you've had, I'd agree, but my experiences have been quite different. Start earlier, perhaps dinner, play more than once, sleep close, morning wood taken advantage of, breakfast, part mid to late morning with a glow.

He is Greek Turkish mix. Usually he travels with his friend, a tall blond. Last I saw their insta a few days ago they were in Istanbul. Again, it is very possible the ad is genuine and they are now in NY.