+ PhileasFogg Posted yesterday at 01:04 AM Posted yesterday at 01:04 AM (edited) Interestingly, there is a rumor that the wife in the couple next door was caught by her husband in bed with a female friend. Everyone seems ok with that. If the husband had been found in bed with another man, I believe there would be a high probability of “judgement” and possibly a divorce. This is Mississippi. Where are you and eould there be a double standard? Edited yesterday at 01:04 AM by PhileasFogg + Pensant and marylander1940 2
Nightowl Posted yesterday at 01:21 AM Posted yesterday at 01:21 AM Men are turned on by woman-on-woman action but women of the wife variety are not turned on by man-on-man action. Definitely a double standard. + Charlie, marylander1940 and Danny-Darko 2 1
+ azdr0710 Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM Posted yesterday at 02:08 AM liubit, + Pensant, BSR and 3 others 1 5
Lotus-eater Posted yesterday at 06:20 AM Posted yesterday at 06:20 AM The double standard among straight men also has a plausible biological basis because his wife having sex with another woman does not pose a paternity threat. + Pensant, mike carey, marylander1940 and 3 others 3 3
wsc Posted yesterday at 07:43 AM Posted yesterday at 07:43 AM 1 hour ago, Lotus-eater said: The double standard among straight men also has a plausible biological basis because his wife having sex with another woman does not pose a paternity threat. Agreed, but neither does her husband sleeping with the other husband. Unless this AI thing has gotten completely out of hand. + Charlie, + PhileasFogg and jeezifonly 3
+ PhileasFogg Posted yesterday at 07:56 AM Author Posted yesterday at 07:56 AM (edited) 7 hours ago, Lotus-eater said: The double standard among straight men also has a plausible biological basis because his wife having sex with another woman does not pose a paternity threat. Good point, but also taking this to a new level, that would mean that me sleeping with HER is OK since I had a vasectomy decades ago Edited 23 hours ago by PhileasFogg + Charlie 1
+ Jamie21 Posted yesterday at 08:56 AM Posted yesterday at 08:56 AM I think straight men are more scared / censorious of same sex activity than straight women are. Women seem much more open minded to same sex activity whether that’s guy on guy or girl on girl. I’ve done live sex shows (me and another guy fucking) and most of the audience was women, of all sexualities. They loved watching two guys go at it. The ‘straight’ men in the audience were more anxious about it (probably because they were turned on but didn’t want to acknowledge that because that might make them gay 😂). The women just enjoyed it. + azdr0710, + PhileasFogg, liubit and 2 others 4 1
caramelsub Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago (edited) 5 hours ago, Jamie21 said: I think straight men are more scared / censorious of same sex activity than straight women are. Women seem much more open minded to same sex activity whether that’s guy on guy or girl on girl. I’ve done live sex shows (me and another guy fucking) and most of the audience was women, of all sexualities. They loved watching two guys go at it. The ‘straight’ men in the audience were more anxious about it (probably because they were turned on but didn’t want to acknowledge that because that might make them gay 😂). The women just enjoyed it. I think it has to do with women are more likely to “identify” as bisexual or pansexual, whether they truly are or not. So many young female pop stars and celebrities call themselves bisexual or pansexual then end up marrying men. Nikki Minaj recently admitted to lying about being bi early in her career. Almost like it was a trend to be bi. With men I think there is less of a spectrum of sexuality. Though bisexuality does exist with men, it seems most men either identify as gay or straight. And straight men are more likely to be homophobic. Edited 22 hours ago by caramelsub
Nue2thegame Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 7 hours ago, Jamie21 said: I think straight men are more scared / censorious of same sex activity than straight women are. Women seem much more open minded to same sex activity whether that’s guy on guy or girl on girl. I agree but not sure that this applies in Mississippi…. + Jamie21 1
+ Charlie Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago "In bed with.." and "Having sex with..." are not necessarily the same thing. In most societies it is considered normal for women to openly show affection for one another, by things like kissing, while that is considered much more questionable between two men. liubit 1
+ Vegas_Millennial Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 17 hours ago, Nightowl said: Men are turned on by woman-on-woman action but women of the wife variety are not turned on by man-on-man action. Definitely a double standard. Yes. Women can be more judgemental, and all of society pays the consequences. Nightowl 1
+ Vegas_Millennial Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 17 hours ago, PhileasFogg said: This is Mississippi. My friend, who lives in Louisiana, says the best places for him to find plenty of cock are Mississippi truck stops! 🍆 🎉 🇺🇲🚛 Edited 18 hours ago by Vegas_Millennial marylander1940 and + Charlie 1 1
+ PhileasFogg Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago 1 minute ago, Vegas_Millennial said: My friend, who lives in Louisiana, says the best places for him to find plenty of cock are Mississippi truck stops! Wouldn't surprise me at all. Of course, interstate traffic isn't necessarily local...but then, Louisiana is simply Mississippi's french cousin - voulez vous coucher avec moi + Charlie 1
+ PhileasFogg Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Charlie said: "In bed with.." and "Having sex with..." are not necessarily the same thing. In most societies it is considered normal for women to openly show affection for one another, by things like kissing, while that is considered much more questionable between two men. Where does "scissoring" enter into the shades of grey? + Charlie 1
Nue2thegame Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 50 minutes ago, PhileasFogg said: Where does "scissoring" enter into the shades of grey? A darker grey than French kissing and breast fondling, lighter than 69 or strap-on sex, according to my lesbian friends. + PhileasFogg 1
+ PhileasFogg Posted 17 hours ago Author Posted 17 hours ago 40 minutes ago, Nue2thegame said: A darker grey than French kissing and breast fondling, lighter than 69 or strap-on sex, according to my lesbian friends. When will you publish the data from your research + Charlie and Nue2thegame 1 1
Nightowl Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 1 hour ago, Vegas_Millennial said: My friend, who lives in Louisiana, says the best places for him to find plenty of cock are Mississippi truck stops! 🍆 🎉 🇺🇲🚛 Doesn’t surprise me at all. + Charlie 1
marylander1940 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 21 hours ago, PhileasFogg said: Interestingly, there is a rumor that the wife in the couple next door was caught by her husband in bed with a female friend. Everyone seems ok with that. If the husband had been found in bed with another man, I believe there would be a high probability of “judgement” and possibly a divorce. This is Mississippi. Where are you and eould there be a double standard? Without a doubt! Is only up to her husband to judge was his wife was doing with another woman in bed. He might even join. Bisexuality (real not being gay and in denial) is judged differently for men, most women might find it disgusting, but straight men might find interesting having a bisexual wife as long as they're allowed to join.
marylander1940 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 4 hours ago, Vegas_Millennial said: My friend, who lives in Louisiana, says the best places for him to find plenty of cock are Mississippi truck stops! 🍆 🎉 🇺🇲🚛 for risky outdoor sex there's nothing like the Bible Belt! + Vegas_Millennial 1
+ Vegas_Millennial Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 14 minutes ago, marylander1940 said: for risky outdoor sex there's nothing like the Bible Belt! Getting down on your knees is not just for prayer! ⛪🍆 marylander1940 1
BuckCanucked Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago Relatedly, I knew a guy in high school who proudly declared support for gay men because it improved his chances of scoring with girls... as it reduced the number of guys on the field, sort to speak. It didn't make sense of course, but he was hardly the type to pour over Kinsey studies to check his theories.
+ PhileasFogg Posted 13 hours ago Author Posted 13 hours ago 20 minutes ago, BuckCanucked said: Relatedly, I knew a guy in high school who proudly declared support for gay men because it improved his chances of scoring with girls... as it reduced the number of guys on the field, sort to speak. It didn't make sense of course, but he was hardly the type to pour over Kinsey studies to check his theories. In college, I was a straight man living with a gay best friend (yes…two bedrooms and no funny business). And of course, good looking women sought good looking gay men - in the 80’s - thinking they could score or change them. Well, when frustrated, my bedroom was right next door and no women left unhappy. And FTR, 20yrs ago, I passed Kinsey’s house on the way to/from work in Bloomington. Ohhhhh, the stories those walls could tell… + Vegas_Millennial 1
+ Vegas_Millennial Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, BuckCanucked said: Relatedly, I knew a guy in high school who proudly declared support for gay men because it improved his chances of scoring with girls... as it reduced the number of guys on the field, sort to speak I, too, had a friend in high school who said the same thing. Interestingly, the chance of being born gay increases with each successive male offspring from the mother. It may be partly Nature's way of removing the competition for women in tribes with lots of males.
+ PhileasFogg Posted 12 hours ago Author Posted 12 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Vegas_Millennial said: I, too, had a friend in high school who said the same thing. Interestingly, the chance of being born gay increases with each successive male offspring from the mother. It may be partly Nature's way of removing the competition for women in tribes with lots of males. Isn’t it statistically likely since a larger sample produces a distribution more akin to larger universe?
BuckCanucked Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, Vegas_Millennial said: It may be partly Nature's way of removing the competition for women in tribes with lots of males. Who else was going to design all those Fab👏U👏Lous furs and loin cloths?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now