Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Cooper said:

There’s a reason why we ask you not to post information that could possibly jeopardize the licenses of the Spas or masseurs. We never know who’s reading it. 

NYPOST.COM

The two spas, located in Times Square and near StuyTown, allegedly offered undercover cops sub-$100...

 

It's happening....porn sites and rentmen are next.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

I have stated this many times. Just because sexual favors are readily available in the industry, we shouldn't forget that this is still ILLEGAL.

Therefore sex and payment shouldn't be discussed in the same sentence.

Including 🎶“how much to do doggie with that endowed?🎵

Edited by SirBillybob
Posted

“Preserving quality of life for New Yorkers is a priority for the city”

Wouldn’t making sex work legal and regulated contribute to quality of life? It seems that regulation could reduce sex trafficking, spread of STD’s, and underworld influence as well as adding a few dollars to the tax coffers.

Posted
1 hour ago, Smokey said:

Wouldn’t making sex work legal and regulated contribute to quality of life?

Absolutely.

1 hour ago, Smokey said:

It seems that regulation could reduce sex trafficking, spread of STD’s, and underworld influence as well as adding a few dollars to the tax coffers.

But it would require smart, progressive thinkers and leaders. America is at a soaring deficit right now. What a pity for all of us, especially the wonderful sex workers. What a shame we all have to hide in silence. I doubt this will change with however many years I have left. Yes, I am bitter about this. We can do better.

Posted

How does this all go down? I’m unclear - did the undercover cops actually get a massage and then get an upgrade offer? Did they pay, which I assume would come from Police Department funds? Did they tip? They came back a few times? Were they naked? Did they have guns with them and while they were on a massage table, were the guns safely stored? 
 

I’m intrigued. My fantasy needs details. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Typical said:

undercover cops

Undercover cops in NYC do not look like typical cops. They look like ordinary folks. Some are actually very attractive, like actors. I'm sure they prefer that.

16 minutes ago, Typical said:

Did they have guns with them

The ancillary cops that are part of the bust have guns, for sure, but the cops getting the service do not, and they look like ordinary customers at all times. That is how a sting works. It is very difficult to know when one is happening, because undercover cops are well trained in how to appear normal.

Posted
Just now, Trick said:

I’m confused.  The article says gay spa but masseuses offered the “manual manipulation”?

There's really no confusion. A lot of guys on here mix up masseur/masseuse all the time, so the Post wasn't precise, but it's clear what they were reporting.

Posted
40 minutes ago, JayinHKNYC said:

There's really no confusion. A lot of guys on here mix up masseur/masseuse all the time, so the Post wasn't precise, but it's clear what they were reporting.

I was just playing

Posted
13 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

I have stated this many times. Just because sexual favors are readily available in the industry, we shouldn't forget that this is still ILLEGAL.

Therefore sex and payment shouldn't be discussed in the same sentence.

Like the police need a chat group to know that these m4m spas peddle flesh 🤣

Posted

I just thank God NYC isn’t wasting precious taxpayer resources on patrolling subways or filling pot holes or picking up trash and instead is now focused on ending handjobs given to people I don’t know by people I’ve never met in places I’ve never been. What a relief! I feel safer already. 
 

(Who are the loser cops signed up for this pathetic duty? Their families must be so proud! “Mom and Dad! I brought a halt to some dangerous handjobs on 42nd Street today!  Are you proud?”) 

Posted
5 hours ago, Typical said:

How does this all go down? I’m unclear - did the undercover cops actually get a massage and then get an upgrade offer? Did they pay, which I assume would come from Police Department funds? Did they tip? They came back a few times? Were they naked? Did they have guns with them and while they were on a massage table, were the guns safely stored? 

If they take the upgrade, should the masseuse(sic) save the spunk or swallow the evidence? You know, just in case DNA evidence is helpful for the defendent

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Typical said:

I just thank God NYC isn’t wasting precious taxpayer resources on patrolling subways or filling pot holes or picking up trash and instead is now focused on ending handjobs given to people I don’t know by people I’ve never met in places I’ve never been. What a relief! I feel safer already. 
 

(Who are the loser cops signed up for this pathetic duty? Their families must be so proud! “Mom and Dad! I brought a halt to some dangerous handjobs on 42nd Street today!  Are you proud?”) 

You’re so right. But then again, less than six months ago, it was trans athletes who were the problem. So we shouldn’t be surprised they’re targeting the gay community within the LGBTQ umbrella now. It’s all full circle moment for them. We’re the threat? Fuck that! But the homophobes will eat it all up.

I dream of a day where sex work is legal, where our communities are treated with kindness, respect and compassion. Where we work on mental health and stopping true crime over who gets sucked and fucked. That’s a true happy ending.

Edited by Andysquestions
Grammar
Posted

It’s an election year.   Ask At a town hall or community meeting how much the sting and raids cost  as we approach an election cycle!  And how much could that money go to shelters or getting guns off the streets! 

Posted
14 hours ago, Smokey said:

Wouldn’t making sex work legal and regulated contribute to quality of life?

Unfortunately the predominant narrative is that sex is a power dynamic and anyone related to sex work must either be abused or an abuser.  Until we stop the nonsense that someone can sue claiming a sex act for money was not consensual years after the fact because she/he was powerless but needed the money, it's not going to be as simple as "let's all be adult about this".

Posted
10 minutes ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

Unfortunately the predominant narrative is that sex is a power dynamic and anyone related to sex work must either be abused or an abuser.  Until we stop the nonsense that someone can sue claiming a sex act for money was not consensual years after the fact because she/he was powerless but needed the money, it's not going to be as simple as "let's all be adult about this".

That would be the entire porn industry then. Lol. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...