Ali Gator Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Camelot, as we know it, is now officially dead. Multi-billionaire David Geffen is back on the market, at the age of 82. Which means so is his husband of 23 months, former 'go-go dancer' Donovan Michaels (David Armstrong), 32. Geffen filed for divorce today, citing 'irreconcilable differences'. The couple married with no pre-nup, but California laws seem to be on Geffen's side. David Geffen Files for Divorce, No Prenup WWW.TMZ.COM Entertainment mogul David Geffen has filed for divorce, to end his less-than-2-year marriage. pubic_assistance 1
moonlight Posted May 17 Posted May 17 I'd be curious how much alimony he'll get for that year. That alone might be enough to set him up for life. Even without a prenup he probably won't get much else. Oh, and David... call me, handsome 😘. I have a thing for bespectacled men with their name on concert halls 🤩 + claym, BSR, pubic_assistance and 1 other 4
+ azdr0710 Posted May 17 Posted May 17 https://www.companyofmen.org/news/gay-news/eighty-year-old-media-mogul-david-geffen-marries-30-year-old-boyfriend-in-private-ceremony-r6409/ https://www.companyofmen.org/topic/139781-david-geffen-on-the-“news”/ pubic_assistance 1
+ nycman Posted May 17 Posted May 17 (edited) Poor dumb whore. He probably was even the one who demanded "no pre-nup" from Geffen. All the while Geffen knew, given his current financial situation and the divorce laws in California, that meant the boy toy would walk away with close to nothing without a pre-nup. The hooker should have demanded a $10 Million dollar pre-nup. I feel a song coming on….. Edited May 17 by nycman thomas, MikeThomas, + claym and 1 other 1 1 1 1
BSR Posted May 17 Posted May 17 (edited) While just 1/4 of the way through, I’m sure this will end up as “least surprising news of the 21st century,” or at least top 5. While I couldn’t care less about the details of their relationship, I am a bit curious as to just how much PYT ends up with. If it is as little as the TMZ article indicates is likely, oh my, he really isn’t the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree. Edited May 17 by BSR Typo + claym, Lotus-eater and pubic_assistance 2 1
d.anders Posted May 17 Posted May 17 Why would an 80-year-old gay billionaire get "married" to a 30-year-old? Sounds really stupid and mentally fucked up to me. What on earth is lacking in a human connection, that one would need to get "married" at the age of 80? Redwine56, + DrownedBoy, pubic_assistance and 1 other 1 3
Ali Gator Posted May 17 Author Posted May 17 Geffen is worth $8.7 Billion. He's been legally retired for 15 years, so he has had 'no income' so to speak, except from investments - which, by California law, is not 'communal property' to be split up (so Geffen keeps all of it). Most likey, under CA law, he will get spousal support for one year (it's half the time of the marriage). After nearly two years of marriage, if Geffen was to give this aging 'go go boy' lust .05%, the boy walks away with nearly $44M. He will never have to sell his dick again. BTW - here he is in his first 'gay scene' a few years ago: RB - SCOTTY MARX & BRANDON FOSTER - REQUESTED by MEMBER - p..com - XVIDEOS.COM TINYURL.COM XVIDEOS RB - SCOTTY MARX & BRANDON FOSTER - REQUESTED by MEMBER - p..com free Lotus-eater, Redwine56, pubic_assistance and 2 others 1 2 2
robberbaron4u Posted May 17 Posted May 17 10 hours ago, BSR said: While just 1/4 of the way through, I’m sure this will end up as “least surprising news of the 21st century,” or at least top 5. While I couldn’t care less about the details of their relationship, I am a bit curious as to just how much PYT ends up with. If it is as little as the TMZ article indicates is likely, oh my, he really isn’t the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree. I daresay he isn't the brghtest button in the box nor, with the onset of the fatal illness known as "aging", the prettiest. Doubtless, Mr. Geffen will go shopping for something extraordinary to market pubic_assistance 1
Luv2play Posted May 18 Posted May 18 11 hours ago, d.anders said: Why would an 80-year-old gay billionaire get "married" to a 30-year-old? Sounds really stupid and mentally fucked up to me. What on earth is lacking in a human connection, that one would need to get "married" at the age of 80? This happens not infrequently in the world of the uber wealthy. Remember that Texas multimillionaire who married that blonde bombshell who inherited his money, Nicole Smith. Or Doris Duke of an era gone by. Nothing new except the gay billionaires now feel free to mimic the straights.
+ BenjaminNicholas Posted May 18 Posted May 18 (edited) 12 hours ago, d.anders said: Why would an 80-year-old gay billionaire get "married" to a 30-year-old? Because he can. When you're worth billions someday, lemme know about how your new normal changes. He's living in a world where he neither cares what we think, nor needs to. Edited May 18 by BenjaminNicholas pubic_assistance, MikeThomas and Njguy2 1 2
MikeThomas Posted May 18 Posted May 18 The negative comments posted above by people who in all likelihood don’t know either party come as no surprise. I’m sure when they got married they thought it would last. To bad it didn’t work out. + glutes, + nycman, + BenjaminNicholas and 6 others 2 1 1 1 4
+ Gar1eth Posted May 18 Posted May 18 8 hours ago, Luv2play said: This happens not infrequently in the world of the uber wealthy. Remember that Texas multimillionaire who married that blonde bombshell who inherited his money, Nicole Smith. Or Doris Duke of an era gone by. Nothing new except the gay billionaires now feel free to mimic the straights. Just a slight emendation-her name was 'Anna' Nicole Smith. + BenjaminNicholas and Luv2play 1 1
+ nycman Posted May 18 Posted May 18 7 hours ago, MikeThomas said: The negative comments posted above by people who in all likelihood don’t know either party come as no surprise. I’m sure when they got married they thought it would last. One thing is clear….you don’t know David. grin Rod Hagen and caliguy 1 1
BSR Posted May 18 Posted May 18 Most of this Matteo Lane bit is about a straight couple with a 14-year age difference, but his mention of a May-December gay couple applies to Geffen & his soon-to-be ex. 86K views · 1.9K reactions | Matteo Lane - Gay vs Straight Dating (1)... WWW.FACEBOOK.COM Matteo Lane - Gay vs Straight Dating (1) #matteolane #standupcomedy #crowdwork #comedy #humor #improv #jokes #reaction #podcast #podcastshow... pubic_assistance 1
pubic_assistance Posted May 18 Posted May 18 20 hours ago, Ali Gator said: Geffen is worth $8.7 Billion. He's been legally retired for 15 years, so he has had 'no income' so to speak, except from investments - which, by California law, is not 'communal property' to be split up (so Geffen keeps all of it). Most likey, under CA law, he will get spousal support for one year (it's half the time of the marriage). After nearly two years of marriage, if Geffen was to give this aging 'go go boy' lust .05%, the boy walks away with nearly $44M. He will never have to sell his dick again. BTW - here he is in his first 'gay scene' a few years ago: RB - SCOTTY MARX & BRANDON FOSTER - REQUESTED by MEMBER - p..com - XVIDEOS.COM TINYURL.COM XVIDEOS RB - SCOTTY MARX & BRANDON FOSTER - REQUESTED by MEMBER - p..com free David has good taste. I wonder...if you break down the upcoming settlement, how much did he pay per orgasm? 🤔 Luv2play, caliguy, Lotus-eater and 2 others 1 1 3
mtaabq Posted May 18 Posted May 18 10 hours ago, MikeThomas said: The negative comments posted above by people who in all likelihood don’t know either party come as no surprise. I’m sure when they got married they thought it would last. To bad it didn’t work out. You make an excellent observation. Thank you.
d.anders Posted May 18 Posted May 18 12 hours ago, BenjaminNicholas said: Because he can. In simple terms, I suppose this can be the only answer. 12 hours ago, BenjaminNicholas said: When you're worth billions someday, lemme know about how your new normal changes. Money does change a person, and he's had his wealth for a very long time. 12 hours ago, BenjaminNicholas said: He's living in a world where he neither cares what we think, nor needs to. It's definitely a world quite far from my own. caliguy and pubic_assistance 1 1
MikeThomas Posted May 18 Posted May 18 (edited) 4 hours ago, nycman said: One thing is clear….you don’t know David. grin You are right. So I can't form an opinion about him as a person one way or another. Edited May 18 by MikeThomas
caliguy Posted May 18 Posted May 18 (edited) Uh oh. At least Calvin's hubby is sticking with him. They've actually been together for awhile. He seems way more grounded then his last one. 🤣 Back in the 2000. I used to hang out with Geffen at parties and get togethers. Friend of good friends and all. He'd have these hot boys shipped from all over the world for weeks at at a time on regular basis. Yeah, of course I'd be doing it all the time too. It was obviously but he was still 58 so not so ridiculous looking. Now it's just tragic. It's more akin to Anna Nichole and that rich mogul she was umm....dating. Those guys are just like Vultures waiting for the day it dies which is fine if you just want to fuck them but leave it at that. Jeez. Edited May 18 by caliguy Danny-Darko 1
shadowcatzxxx Posted May 18 Posted May 18 (edited) On 5/17/2025 at 9:07 AM, d.anders said: Why would an 80-year-old gay billionaire get "married" to a 30-year-old? Sounds really stupid and mentally fucked up to me. What on earth is lacking in a human connection, that one would need to get "married" at the age of 80? As a 74 year-old widower, currently dating a 34 year-old, I find this thread to be interesting, with some comments amusing, and some cruelly judgemental ... like this one. Not sure why you view Geffen's decision as "stupid and mentally fucked up." Specifically, I most definitely wonder why you wonder why an 80-year-old would want or need the close emotional/personal connection of marriage. I had been very active on this forum, and in this hobby, in the years since my husband of 30+ years died ... and now cruise the site out of interest and, perhaps, nostalgia, because I haven't hired since I entered this new relationship. I am the kind of person who deeply and fundamentally enjoys close emotional connection (as well as satisfying sex). After becoming overly (and damned foolishly) entangled with a handsome, hot, charming provider, and then extricating myself from that connection, I doubted I would ever find the kind of connection I wanted. And then -- precisely because I had stopped actively "looking" -- it happened. We met in a professional setting, and have been dating since. I am deeply in love. He says the same and, unless he is worthy of every stage/screen acting award on the planet, is genuinely in love with me. While I make no judgements (AT ALL) about someone who would get emotionally (and legally) involved with someone described as a "porn star and go-go-boy" the age difference in and of itself shouldn't be an issue ... assuming that both participants are both honest and enter into the relationship with their eyes open. Is my admittedly admirable financial situation (though not even remotely close to billionaire status!!!) a mutually-acknowledged part of the equation? Of course!! I would be foolish indeed (even blind, perhaps) if I did not acknowledge that and take it into consideration. Such things are always part of any relationship -- gay, straight, same-age or May-November -- to a greater or lesser degree. I always earned substantially more than my husband, and I therefore paid for many things we enjoyed together, from real-estate to dining out and global travel. If the extraordinarily intelligent and hard-working (and, yes, very handsome and sweet, and sexy) young professional I am involved with is willing to share a number of his prime years of life with me, I am more than willing to reciprocate with reasonable intellectual, emotional, and financial support ... including post-mortem asset-sharing, (with an appropriate pre-nup.) This isn't just a sexual fling, although the sex is wonderful. (I prefer to refer to it as "making love" rather than just hot sex ... although it is hot, on both physical and emotional levels.) Having met in a professional setting, we soon discovered that we have similar interests in international culture, travel, food, and a wide range of intellectual pursuits. Do I enjoy close and rewarding emotional connections with a reasonable number of friends and family member? Thankfully, yes. Do I have enough self-esteem to be self-sufficient emotionally if I choose to be? Also, thankfully, yes. Do I have some nagging doubts about the $$ issue? Of course I do! I don't consider myself to be blind, naïve, or foolish. Did I have various doubts about my marriage that lasted for more than three decades until death parted us? You bet! And I've learned that one can either hold out for perfection (whatever that might be) or one can barricade oneself by rejecting every potential relationship with any inequities, or one can, with due diligence and careful thought, allow oneself to enjoy the delights of romantic and physical love -- rather than allowing something like age-difference and society's reaction to that get in the way. With full acknowledgement of the risk it entails, I have chosen the latter. Time will tell whether the decision to engage in this way will play out the way I hope it will. In the meantime, I am thrilled for the chance to enjoy the delights of love again ... while making absolutely NO judgments whatsoever about people who prefer a series of blazingly hot sexual trysts, whether those involve financial transactions or not. Been there too, and enjoyed it immensely! Edited May 18 by shadowcatzxxx minor correction Smokey, liubit, soloyo215 and 14 others 3 2 3 9
MikeBiDude Posted May 18 Posted May 18 2 minutes ago, shadowcatzxxx said: As a 74 year-old widower, currently dating a 34 year-old, I find this thread to be interesting, with some comments amusing, and some cruelly judgemental ... like this one. Not sure why you view Geffen's decision as "stupid and mentally fucked up." Specifically, I most definitely wonder why you feel that an 80-year-old would want or need the close emotional/personal connection of marriage. I had been very active on this forum, and in this hobby, in the years since my husband of 30+ years died ... and now cruise the site out of interest and, perhaps, nostalgia, because I haven't hired since I entered this new relationship. I am the kind of person who deeply and fundamentally enjoys close emotional connection (as well as satisfying sex). After becoming overly (and damned foolishly) entangled with a handsome, hot, charming provider, and then extricating myself from that connection, I doubted I would ever find the kind of connection I wanted. And then -- precisely because I had stopped actively "looking" -- it happened. We met in a professional setting, and have been dating since. I am deeply in love. He says the same and, unless he is worthy of every stage/screen acting award on the planet, is genuinely in love with me. While I make no judgements (AT ALL) about someone who would get emotionally (and legally) involved with someone described as a "porn star and go-go-boy" the age difference in and of itself shouldn't be an issue ... assuming that both participants are both honest and enter into the relationship with their eyes open. Is my admittedly admirable financial situation (though not even remotely close to billionaire status!!!) a mutually-acknowledged part of the equation? Of course!! I would be foolish indeed (even blind, perhaps) if I did not acknowledge that and take it into consideration. Such things are always part of any relationship -- gay, straight, same-age or May-November -- to a greater or lesser degree. I always earned substantially more than my husband, and I therefore paid for many things we enjoyed together, from real-estate to dining out and global travel. If the extraordinarily intelligent and hard-working (and, yes, very handsome and sweet, and sexy) young professional I am involved with is willing to share a number of his prime years of life with me, I am more than willing to reciprocate with reasonable intellectual, emotional, and financial support ... including post-mortem asset-sharing, (with an appropriate pre-nup.) This isn't just a sexual fling, although the sex is wonderful. (I prefer to refer to it as "making love" rather than just hot sex ... although it is hot, on both physical and emotional levels.) Having met in a professional setting, we soon discovered that we have similar interests in international culture, travel, food, and a wide range of intellectual pursuits. Do I enjoy close and rewarding emotional connections with a reasonable number of friends and family member? Thankfully, yes. Do I have enough self-esteem to be self-sufficient emotionally if I choose to be? Also, thankfully, yes. Do I have some nagging doubts about the $$ issue? Of course I do! I don't consider myself to be blind, naïve, or foolish. Did I have various doubts about my marriage that lasted for more than three decades until death parted us? You bet! And I've learned that one can either hold out for perfection (whatever that might be) or one can barricade oneself by rejecting every potential relationship with any inequities, or one can, with due diligence and careful thought, allow oneself to enjoy the delights of romantic and physical love -- rather than allowing something like age-difference and society's reaction to that get in the way. With full acknowledgement of the risk it entails, I have chosen the latter. Time will tell whether the decision to engage in this way will play out the way I hope it will. In the meantime, I am thrilled for the chance to enjoy the delights of love again ... while making absolutely NO judgments whatsoever about people who prefer a series of blazingly hot sexual trysts, whether those involve financial transactions or not. Been there too, and enjoyed it immensely! Bravo! 👏 thomas, pubic_assistance, shadowcatzxxx and 1 other 3 1
d.anders Posted May 18 Posted May 18 (edited) 56 minutes ago, shadowcatzxxx said: I am the kind of person who deeply and fundamentally enjoys close emotional connection (as well as satisfying sex). I enjoy those things, too, but I don't need a legal contract to enjoy them, especially at 80. 56 minutes ago, shadowcatzxxx said: Not sure why you view Geffen's decision as "stupid and mentally fucked up." I should have chosen my words more carefully. I apologize. However, when things go wrong, the headline above is not something I would want as a famous billionaire. At 80, with fame and great money at the ready, why invite trouble with a legal contract? I guess I might have more respect for this relationship had there been a pre-nup. That legal contract makes sense to me. If you are wealthy, and you truly fall in love, then designate a loving number in your will, or in your pre-nup if things don't work out. I just don't see the need for a marriage, especially to someone 40 years younger. Edited May 18 by d.anders Redwine56 1
maninsoma Posted May 18 Posted May 18 I agree that a significant age difference shouldn't be an issue that anyone else concerns themselves with, assuming neither party is mentally incompetent. I briefly dated someone 25 years younger than me (I was in my early 50s and he was in his late 20s). We didn't work out as a couple, but more than a decade later we're still good friends. Redwine56 1
MikeThomas Posted May 18 Posted May 18 Meanwhile in heteroland… What’s Really Startling About the Bill Belichick Affair APPLE.NEWS Belichick always kept tight control of his dealings and a considerable distance from the press. Then he... caliguy 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now