Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Anyone else find it weird when providers list their position as “top” yet they have mostly ass pics and not a single dick pic? Are they sending a subliminal message? Are they really vers? Is it a fake profile? Maybe I’m reading too much into it but it seems so counterintuitive. Take this guy for example, literally the first pic on this “top’s” profile is an ass pic…

RENT.MEN

Isaacorete Gay Escort in Las Vegas, Nevada, available for Gay Escorting,Erotic Massage,Bodywork. | Find all the best...

 

Edited by Sub boy
Posted
16 hours ago, Sub boy said:

Anyone else find it weird when providers list their position as “top” yet they have mostly ass pics and not a single dick pic? Are they sending a subliminal message? Are they really vers? Maybe I’m reading too much into it but it seems so counterintuitive. Take this guy for example, literally the first pic on this “top’s” profile is an ass pic…

RENT.MEN

Isaacorete Gay Escort in Las Vegas, Nevada, available for Gay Escorting,Erotic Massage,Bodywork. | Find all the best...

 

You picked a poor example. That escort only has 1 review, calling him a total fraud and watch out. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Luv2play said:

You picked a poor example. That escort only has 1 review, calling him a total fraud and watch out. 

I didn’t say I was considering hiring him. I’m very selective and I do careful vetting of the escorts I hire. I’d even agree that he’s probably a fraud, but that wasn’t the point of this topic. 

Posted
Just now, Sub boy said:

I didn’t say I was considering hiring him. I’m very selective and I do careful vetting of the escorts I hire. I’d even agree that he’s probably a fraud, but that wasn’t the point of this topic. 

The point you were making as I understood you is questioning why tops advertise showing pics of their butts primarily or most prominently. If the example you selected is a fraud then while we don’t know the reason, he may not be a top as advertised or used someone else’s pictures. Other reasons at also be at play. It would have been better to go with a better example. 
 

My experience in looking at the ads is that many tops don’t even show one ass shot and as a bottom, I would like to see it since I like a nice firm butt on the guy topping me. Something nice to hang onto. 😊

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, nycman said:

I take them at their word, and just assume they’re not very savvy in the world of advertising.

Rule # 23: don’t put any items in the window that aren’t for sale. 

And yes, it’s frustrating. Because some tops have beautiful asses. 

I understand why you say that but they're simply showing what a beautiful muscular body they have .

If they have a nice dick I guess they  won the genetic Lottery! 

 

Edited by marylander1940
Posted
2 hours ago, Luv2play said:

The point you were making as I understood you is questioning why tops advertise showing pics of their butts primarily or most prominently. If the example you selected is a fraud then while we don’t know the reason, he may not be a top as advertised or used someone else’s pictures. Other reasons at also be at play. It would have been better to go with a better example. 
 

My experience in looking at the ads is that many tops don’t even show one ass shot and as a bottom, I would like to see it since I like a nice firm butt on the guy topping me. Something nice to hang onto. 😊

I guess these would be better examples

https://rent.men/Nick_TopMaster

https://rent.men/ChocolateHands

https://rent.men/Maykul

https://rent.men/BabyBearLA

https://rent.men/CuCa

And I get it, maybe one ass shot to show the total person or that they’ve got something to hang onto, but my point is I find it weird when they have multiple ass pics or only ass pics and advertising as “top”

Posted
15 minutes ago, Sub boy said:

I guess these would be better examples

https://rent.men/Nick_TopMaster

https://rent.men/ChocolateHands

https://rent.men/Maykul

https://rent.men/BabyBearLA

https://rent.men/CuCa

And I get it, maybe one ass shot to show the total person or that they’ve got something to hang onto, but my point is I find it weird when they have multiple ass pics or only ass pics and advertising as “top”

I don't think I ever would've thought there was an unusual number of ass pics in those profiles - maybe 2 or 3 of 20+? But interesting to know this perspective is out there for those who are into total tops.

Posted
18 hours ago, Shawn Monroe said:

I mean you could ask, but when I was on RM, having only nudes or dick pics gave implied permission for people to ask just for more pics or not set up appointments. 
 

Setting his ass as his main pic is like 10% weird, but he’s presenting himself as a full person and not just a dick 

Valid. But just as I have learned to be able to quickly sniff out fake providers, I’m sure you learned to quickly sniff out pic collectors and time wasters.

But regardless, I feel like a provider can present himself as a full person without any nudes at all. My point is the mixed messaging if a provider who lists “top” chooses to post nudes but they include mainly ass pics

Posted
4 minutes ago, Andy768 said:

I don't think I ever would've thought there was an unusual number of ass pics in those profiles - maybe 2 or 3 of 20+? But interesting to know this perspective is out there for those who are into total tops.

Well take the first profile Nick for example: Total top, 0 dick pics, 8 ass pics. The math just isn’t mathing.

And I’m not into total tops btw, I’m into guys who are good at topping (which often doesn’t include total tops in my experience, but that’s another discussion for a different topic). I’m just pointing out things that make me say “Hmm” 🤔 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...