Do most escorts wear condoms?

[Luv2play]

I was told by an escort several years ago that going bareback was now the industry standard. 

[+ Jamie21]

Most clients I see who want to bottom don’t want a condom. I don’t require it if they want to top me. 

[DznNYC]

Honestly I just had my first condom topping experience ever as an escort last week.  

Even listing as a vers bottom, I still mostly top as an escort.  And this was honestly the first time I’ve ever been asked to wear one. 

[+ FrankR]

50 minutes ago, DznNYC said:

Honestly I just had my first condom topping experience ever as an escort last week.  

Even listing as a vers bottom, I still mostly top as an escort.  And this was honestly the first time I’ve ever been asked to wear one. 

I’d bet good money it looked good on ya too! 😉

[Guest]

I had a provider with an XXL dick who wrote on his profile with bold letters "no bareback, safe only". I like peace of mind so such statements made him more attractive to me.

When we met he wanted to go bare with me. I told him that this was not agreed and I don't have condoms for his dick size. He told me he was on prep, but I couldn't believe him so we had to cancel. He was a sweet man but the risk/reward ratio is too high.

He has since removed the "no bareback. safe only" from his profile.

[marylander1940]

On 5/12/2025 at 9:50 AM, Vegas_Millennial said:

To me, it feels better without a condom

Sir, I've never met anyone who would disagree with that statement! 

It certainly feels better raw, but from the 80's and until PrEP, that extra pleasure wasn't worth risking my health and life playing the BB Russian roulette! 

PrEP has been a game changer and yet we still find folks in this forum of all possible places slut shaming folks who take a pill a day and get tested every 3 months. Sad but true! 

 

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

I just had a session today with a masseur in Puerto Vallarta who I've seen twice before.  Midway through the massage, he starts to fuck me and he's wearing a condom.  Then later when I flip over, he puts a towel over my eyes then climbs on top and rides my cock... Bare! 

I've experienced this a few times before, where others want to wear a condom to top but don't want to wear a condom to bottom.

Edited Tuesday at 07:55 PM by Vegas_Millennial

[NYXboy]

I don't know a single person who is not on Prep. *gay person that is

That takes HIV off the table completely. It is provides more protection than condoms.

If are sucking dick without condom on, you will get any of the same STI you would get fucking without on. 

It makes no sense to me why someone would be on prep. suck raw, but then insist on condom to fuck, other than be uneducated. 

[+ Jamie21]

I agree with @NYXboy, I don’t know any sexually active gay guy who isn’t on Prep (unless they can’t take it for medical reasons). In my country (UK) Prep is free and I get a test every 3m to make sure it’s not causing me any side effects. If you’re serious about protection then it makes sense to be on Prep, and to understand its effectiveness.
I assume clients want bareback sex if penetration is on the agenda, whether they’re being top or bottom. Bareback is therefore the default. Occasionally guys have wanted me to use a condom but usually those guys are married and seeing me discreetly do they don’t want to take any risks. If the session is just oral or anything like that I’ve never been asked to use a condom. 

[savantsav]

I have all my vaccines (monkey, covid, hepatitis, hpv, meningitis, etc) am on PrEP and take DoxyPEP after a session. I don't ask folks about their status o whatever because I know I'm protected by the things I'm doing. People who aren't on prep who rely on OTHERS telling them they're on Prep will have a rude awakening one day.

[Nue2thegame]

5 hours ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

I just had a session today with a masseur in Puerto Vallarta who I've seen twice before.  Midway through the massage, he starts to fuck me and he's wearing a condom.  Then later when I flip over, he puts a towel over my eyes then climbs on top and rides my cock... Bare! 

I've experienced this a few times before, where others want to wear a condom to top but don't want to wear a condom to bottom.

I would take that as a sign of his respect  for your safety. 

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

10 hours ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

I just had a session today with a masseur in Puerto Vallarta who I've seen twice before.  Midway through the massage, he starts to fuck me and he's wearing a condom.  Then later when I flip over, he puts a towel over my eyes then climbs on top and rides my cock... Bare! 

I've experienced this a few times before, where others want to wear a condom to top but don't want to wear a condom to bottom.

Later today, still in Puerto Vallarta, I had 2 private dances with 2 different strippers in Puerto Vallarta.  Both fed me their cocks without a condom, but one used a condom to give be a blowjob.  A few licks in and I called off the rest of the "dance".  I'm not into receiving a blowjob with a condom for free, much less paying for it.

[MRK]

On 8/28/2023 at 8:15 PM, handiacefailure said:

I refuse to bb with a provider or anyone for that matter.  Just takes one time   and its not just HIV   good friend of mine got anal warts and that wasnt fun

HPV and anal warts cause both colon & penile cancer. If you've ever seen somebody suffer through colon cancer you'd wear a condom.

[+ PhileasFogg]

10 minutes ago, MRK said:

HPV and anal warts cause both colon & penile cancer. If you've ever seen somebody suffer through colon cancer you'd wear a condom.

So then why will the medical community refuse to vaccinate someone my age?   They presume that someone my age (low 60’s) has already contracted HPV.  But there are different genotypes and some are cancerous and some aren’t. Is there not any protection from vaccinating someone on the assumption that, while likely exposed to HPV, they hadn’t contracted a bad genotype?

It’s counterintuitive to me, but I’m not well informed on the science. 

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

3 minutes ago, PhileasFogg said:

So then why will the medical community refuse to vaccinate someone my age?   They presume that someone my age (low 60’s) has already contracted HPV.  But there are different genotypes and some are cancerous and some aren’t. Is there not any protection from vaccinating someone on the assumption that, while likely exposed to HPV, they hadn’t contracted a bad genotype?

It’s counterintuitive to me, but I’m not well informed on the science. 

You can get it, if a doctor prescribes it; but, your insurance may not cover it.  It's up to you to decide if the potential benefits are worth paying a few hundred dollars now for the vaccine.

Edited 21 hours ago by Vegas_Millennial
Added semicolon

[+ PhileasFogg]

Just now, Vegas_Millennial said:

You can get it, if a doctor prescribes it, but your insurance may not cover it.  It's up to you to decide if the potential benefits are worth paying a few hundred dollars now for the vaccine.

Interestingly, I just paid $750 today for something called a Galeri test that looks for cancer markers.  If my doctor had told me what you just said, the answer would be “of course”

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

1 minute ago, PhileasFogg said:

4 minutes ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

You can get it, if a doctor prescribes it, but your insurance may not cover it.  It's up to you to decide if the potential benefits are worth paying a few hundred dollars now for the vaccine.

Interestingly, I just paid $750 today for something called a Galeri test that looks for cancer markers.  If my doctor had told me what you just said, the answer would be “of course”

For many vaccines that I am too old or otherwise ineligible for, I just show up to my local Health Department with a prescription from my doctor.  When the Health Department questions why I need it when I don't meet the qualifications, I tell them "I'm the town slut...I sleep with many tourists that come to Vegas".  That shuts them up and they administer the vaccine.  Thankfully, my insurance has covered 100% of every vaccine this far.  But, I am willing to pay for the vaccines if it didn't.

[MRK]

21 minutes ago, PhileasFogg said:

So then why will the medical community refuse to vaccinate someone my age?   They presume that someone my age (low 60’s) has already contracted HPV.  But there are different genotypes and some are cancerous and some aren’t. Is there not any protection from vaccinating someone on the assumption that, while likely exposed to HPV, they hadn’t contracted a bad genotype?

It’s counterintuitive to me, but I’m not well informed on the science. 

They've raised the insurance eligibility age multiple times over the years but it's still just at 45. Insurance won't cover it, but you can still get it. You just have to pay for it yourself and it is 3 shots for adults. Most major cities have places where you can get it for free you just have to be willing to pretend you have no insurance and no ID and lie about your age. Anyone who wants it should be able to get it for free or covered by insurance. 
*** Also, make sure you're getting colonoscopies and don't skimp on the prep. The cleaner you are the more they detect.

Edited 20 hours ago by MRK

[MRK]

16 minutes ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

You can get it, if a doctor prescribes it; but, your insurance may not cover it.  It's up to you to decide if the potential benefits are worth paying a few hundred dollars now for the vaccine.

You need a medical professional to administer it, but you really don't need a prescription.

[+ PhileasFogg]

35 minutes ago, Vegas_Millennial said:

For many vaccines that I am too old or otherwise ineligible for, I just show up to my local Health Department with a prescription from my doctor.  When the Health Department questions why I need it when I don't meet the qualifications, I tell them "I'm the town slut...I sleep with many tourists that come to Vegas".  That shuts them up and they administer the vaccine.  Thankfully, my insurance has covered 100% of every vaccine this far.  But, I am willing to pay for the vaccines if it didn't.

I’d imagine then that you’re in a first name basis with the HD staff?? 😉😂

[Swirlygeez]

I will wear a condom unless the client wants bareback. If they do it will be done only if the client has cleaned out and hopefully making sure your ass is clean goes without saying….. I am on prep and doxycycline so I am taking all the precautionary measures one can to stay safe I was also vaccinated for hpv and never had any type of outbreak in that department (thank god)! So being sti free is a must if you want to indulge in my services but I trust no one so that is why I am taking all those precautions. And thankfully I have not received any thing from any of my clients! 
Btw if anyone would like to experience a very adventurous fun experience with me I am available for travel and/or hosting at my apt in Michigan. Please feel free to message me at (734) 255-6134 my name is Kenneth Russell and I look forward to meeting you soon! 

[+ SirBillybob]

4 hours ago, MRK said:

They've raised the insurance eligibility age multiple times over the years but it's still just at 45. Insurance won't cover it, but you can still get it. You just have to pay for it yourself and it is 3 shots for adults. Most major cities have places where you can get it for free you just have to be willing to pretend you have no insurance and no ID and lie about your age. Anyone who wants it should be able to get it for free or covered by insurance. 
*** Also, make sure you're getting colonoscopies and don't skimp on the prep. The cleaner you are the more they detect.

I decided a few years ago as a senior that I would take a single dose of Gardasil 9 at out-of-pocket cost, based on emerging research and opinion at the time on immunogenicity and effectiveness, and of course the bridging considerations with respect to being of an age outside the bounds of study cohorts. I’m not American but I believe that CDC continues to align with Merck’s product monograph indicating multiple doses. In Québec my discussion and rationale all occurred only with the pharmacist, not my MD, as pharmacists here have extended prescription and dispensing privileges in particular clinical areas. For anybody planning additional doses be sure to be aware of the dosing intervals, as the clinical guidance suggests a nullification of desired benefit if not followed to the letter; that said, the imperative of more than one is under review by most jurisdictions. The latency of non-uptake consequences, that is, non-vaccination leading to greater probability of malignancy way down the line naturally renders nailing down the threshold of adequate dosing frequency a challenge.

The Power of a Single Dose: Evidence for a Single-Dose HPV Vaccine Schedule | International Vaccine Access Center

PUBLICHEALTH.JHU.EDU

 

Edited 16 hours ago by SirBillybob

[+ SirBillybob]

There seems to be some question as to the variability of condom use applicability according to specific sexual acts, outside of pharmacological prophylaxis considerations. Receptive vs Insertive anal intercourse is a relatively simple binary divider for risk metrics. In contrast, the three anatomical sites for the most common and frequently referenced bacterial STIs may determine the overt signals of infection that prompt diagnosis tests beyond routine lab evaluation time period iterations. What can seem to be a random contradiction in prophylaxis preference or insistence may actually reflect more method in madness than appears at face value. Similarly, lack of accurate and undistorted knowledge in terms of such complex transmission, symptomatology, and treatment amenability factors may yield confusing behavioural contradictions where naïve ignorance legitimately passes as nonclinical madness. What a juggling act for all of us.

Edited 16 hours ago by SirBillybob

[LookingAround]

I don't know anyone who doesn't bb. Everyone is on prep. 

[+ SirBillybob]

My last 50 sexual partners, all well established in the MSM category, without knowledge of my condom use preference, had condoms on their person. Since I accept and value condom use I don’t bother to assess options for application or not. The only way to validate that everybody is on HIV PrEP and unconditionally barebacks is to ascertain that no condoms exist within a reasonable physical radius for a majority of the cohort with whom you are sexually active. They tend not to be decorative, for brand placement, or erroneously conflated with lube packets of similar dimension. Condoms are often, if obviously not always, the default and there’s no fault in looking around without blinders for a balanced assessment not loaded with personal preferential bias. The most I can say without sounding dumb is that some guys use condoms and others don’t, circumstantially according to a host of factors including serostatus, PrEP, and TasP. 

Edited 16 hours ago by SirBillybob