Pig????

[+ glennnnn]

What does it mean when a provider refers to himself as a "pig"?

[Guest]

I interpret that as he likes to eat cum and likes man smells and plays raw. That’s a personal interpretation based on my own experience. 

Edited January 12, 2023 by Coolwave35

[jeezifonly]

Without inhibition, enthusiastically, slobberingly into it.

“It” is whatever INTO is described in the profile…

Rarely used to describe vanilla activities, but could be. 

[+ RyanDean]

Way back in the 90s, the term often served as something of a catchall to describe kinks or fetishes that weren't necessarily part of a BDSM roleplay or top/bottom scene. It worked as a simple shorthand not only for "raunch" (which could include any and all bodily fluids and -- ahem -- other excretions) while also gesturing toward a broad array of body fetishes -- including extreme nipple play, penis pumping and, perhaps especially, buttplay (ie big dildo or f*sting). 

My sense is it's gotten less specific over the last couple decades but it does seem to cue an enthusiastic willingness to get down and get dirty. But, yes, not "vanilla"...

Edited January 12, 2023 by RyanDean

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

Definitely bareback (no condom)

[Todd Jenkins]

30 minutes ago, Vegas_nw1982 said:

Definitely bareback (no condom)

Not necessarily ...

[+ Jamie21]

I do think that some of the Dictionaries need to define definitively some of these terms because there’s always lots of different interpretations of what they mean. 
Come on Oxford English Dictionary…please include all these sexual terms in your next edition! It will save all these discussions!

[CuriousByNature]

[wsc]

18 hours ago, Jamie21 said:

I do think that some of the Dictionaries need to define definitively some of these terms because there’s always lots of different interpretations of what they mean. 
Come on Oxford English Dictionary…please include all these sexual terms in your next edition! It will save all these discussions!

As an aside to the dictionary angle, after Samuel Johnson had completed his first dictionary of the English language, a committee of the upright ladies of London society came to congratulate him for not including any of the "naughty" words in his dictionary. Johnson thanked them for their sentiments, then commended them for their stamina in looking them up.

[Sensualsmooth]

“pig” has become an overused and hackneyed claim. It is meaningless.

[LookingAround]

For a time it meant bareback. Now it doesn’t necessarily mean that could mean any of the above. 

[Bucky]

pigs are insatiable animals that will eat almost anything until they're stuffed... but then eat more and more.  They can't get enough.  

[+ glennnnn]

Oink! Oink! I do love a wet and filling fuck.

Edited January 14, 2023 by glennnnn

[pubic_assistance]

On 1/12/2023 at 4:24 PM, jeezifonly said:

Without inhibition, enthusiastically

Yes. That has always been my understanding of the term.

Basically turned on by dirty/naughty/uninhibited sexual fetishes.

[Guest]

[+ tassojunior]

On 1/12/2023 at 5:54 PM, Jamie21 said:

I do think that some of the Dictionaries need to define definitively some of these terms because there’s always lots of different interpretations of what they mean. 
Come on Oxford English Dictionary…please include all these sexual terms in your next edition! It will save all these discussions!

[tbinsocal]

PrEP ruined everything.

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

On 1/14/2023 at 2:41 PM, glennnnn said:

Oink! Oink! I do love a wet and filling fuck.

Nice!  I hope you still enjoy pig sex next year 😉