DWnyc

Some Straight men have told me they actually enjoy having sex with men (I’ve pointed out they can’t be straight - that’s a different subject) -often saying things like they feel more desired than by women during it, the better oral isn’t just a cliche, and they can “practice” fucking as gay men will give it away more readily. I can tolerate that to some degree - esp if consensual - but not the self declared straight who treats someone like shit, then takes their money and goes back to a world with more entitlement. now remind me, why did the OP ask the question?

I don’t think that’s it - that would require some empathy, taking time to understand the scene some might seek etc and I don’t see providers were discussing represent themselves that way. Though gay men may seek that out from the experience.

Have lost track of how many providers have “boasted” (perhaps trying to bond) about how they recently screwed over some ethnicity / age / body type they assumed they could belittle in conversation I asked one regular why he had redone his profile to insert “white” to describe himself in almost every other sentence. He talked about the rise of “race play” (no judgement) and how that was coded signaling, but then went on to tell me his theories of how the world should work - him taking peoples money while treating them like cr*p as he can etc (eg not deliver on what was promised but still take the money). it’s how I imagine much of the “straight” provider framing to be (again no disrespect to clients who seek that out)

I can spot that technique a mile off. I also use it frequently 😉

And that trust could be broken / damaged with what one considers a bad surprise I’ve lost count of how many providers have lied about being alone - the roommate, friend who needed a place to stay at the last minute, the dog they don’t think about since they’re minding it temporarily for their friend … etc - not disclosed even after asking

Good - this ranks #2 I think behind cats (allergies) And for New Yorkers and elsewhere up several flights of stairs that should be disclosed too

I typically apply the same rule as to non provider meets - I’ll say (unless it’s an immediate booking) “I’ll confirm before heading out an hour before our appointment and won’t leave till I hear back”. I also request if they’re busy an hour before our time that they confirm from their end sometime before then. works quite well as it covers for most of the typical scenarios: - something better came up but I can’t be bothered to tell you - I’m partied out and have lost sense of time and commitments - I wasn’t realistic on when I’d be free and expected you would hang around but didn’t want to lose the booking - I’m so good the prior client wanted to extend so I couldn’t take your call If there’s no response I leave a voicemail and text so there’s a record saying given the time it will take me to get there if I don’t hear back within 10-15 mins we can consider the appointment canceled. I’ve had a mix of apologetic call backs immediately / requests for a later time / abusive “you’re a flake” accusations and - “you’re so uptight … what’s half … one … one and a half hours to wait for the mighty moi”. As well as absolutely no response at all. My favorite recent excuse was “I was fine but my partner wanted reshoots for our only fans content so I got held up at the studio”

I think most of us have likely seen profiles online of people we know - friends, colleagues etc - and we’ve probably also chuckled or raised eyebrows at things they list - age being the obvious one. And we’ve likely come across someone who reveals something when we actually meet or some time after that which might give pause. Multiple personas and a sign this person can’t be trusted? Or how they choose to be in certain contexts with certain goals in mind … who cares, live and let live. You clearly are engaged in the hobby if on this forum so you are presumably at peace with ethics, risks etc. Is it really different from if you found out he was a saxophone player and it never came up until you discovered it and then only after your first meeting …

Or perhaps being able / willing to fake that interest regardless of orientation I think “straight” in this context gives an out to act totally disinterested and even rude - and that does actually attract some people … in terms of signaling what the attitude will be during the session I’ve met self-defined straight, bi and gay providers who act like they’re doing humanity a favor by allowing a modicum of interaction to those who they see as bottom of the league - the orientation is less important than how they see themselves vs the client in this case

One thing folks don’t think about so much (I assume) is how flexible are the rates in different cities. I know the cultural bias in this forum is “no negotiating! So unclassy!” But that’s not how the world works. So another aspect is how flexible are prices from the initial quote. I find NYC can seem higher than other cities at the start of a conversation but can become equalized or even lower given the huge range of options here. “Take it or leave it” and “I know my value” type positions are fine in theory and in sales training classes but don’t often work in practice. “Value” is what the market allows both sides to settle on after they take some time to see what is really out there.

Works both ways of course. Ultimately most clients won’t engage someone they think isn’t worth it and often that isn’t only about the dollars.

Depends who you are and what you’re offering I have rarely proactively sought more than 1 hr (unless things going really well and I don’t feel tricked into extendibg) - and I’m noticing more providers throwing in an incentive to book in the first place by offering discounted rates for the 2nd hour - and if been quoted as low as 350 or so. By those well reviewed on RM and here. Of course they might not have started with that if I started my inquiries at 2 hours. now I fully recognize there are those that charge 500+ for just one hour, but they wouldn’t be on my shortlist

Maybe he just keeps different aspects of his life separate. Providers are entitled to their intimacy in situations they choose just like everyone else. Maybe he wouldn’t even accept the OP as a client - or indeed as a repeat hookup if he tried hiring him in the way described.

Why do they assume that? Do you correct them (assuming you don’t identify yourself that way?)

To be fair many clients including on this website show general contempt for providers as a whole and it can come out when they engage. Doesn’t justify bad behavior by anyone. Would be easier if there were efforts on both sides to be more empathetic and respectful (while still calling out bad behavior by individuals). Clients and providers should take advantage of hearing out the arguments and reasoning on here even if they disagree. They may leave real life interactions less frustrated as a result.

I assume bottom providers won’t care since this is not a hookup My experience has been top providers on average prefer not to use condoms - I even know of stealthing examples - the excuse primarily to do with not being able to stay hard with protection. I’ve had providers refuse to see me if I insisted on them wearing a condom or saying then that removes the overall act from the options

I’m skeptical on the explanation often given “I rarely check RM messages” - why wouldn’t you check the source of the enquiry in the first place - how many other sources of business does the average provider have?

But surely that can happen on text as well?

I don’t think most stop to think about all this and they don’t need to. If an as implies a provider is in a city now or in the future, the client will assume the provider has all that worked out. Do we think about how a piece of clothing is made, where a chicken nugget comes from or how a song is produced? A little empathy would certainly help and it’s helpful to know pressures providers face in different markets. But how about thinking a little more about clients and what may be going on in their heads too? They’re not all out designing ways to be flaky etc. They have real situations driving their behavior often falling into clear categories. Perhaps it might help to incorporate some of that into a providers strategy. So for instance understanding some clients only plan last minute, some in advance. Some for whom this is a once a year treat others who may book more regularly etc

As discussed here in other contexts, good guy providers offer some temporary fantasy relief here, bad guys can pounce on this dynamic for all sorts of mind games and scams

Rates seem to be coming down in NYC Providers seem more proactive trying to convert enquiries to a booking. Seems less “I don’t have time for these basic questions” and more “did I answer everything?”’and “you said you might be interested, just checking” a few days later …

It often doesn't. What with fear of the law, substances legal and otherwise, discretion that one or both parties requires for whatever reason, not to mention raging hormones or financial necessity / greed, people can sometimes make what may seem like irrational choices. And that applies to stories and behavior from all sides.

Fixed Indeed. I look forward to the more material representative opinion you can bring to the discussion instead of us. As well demonstration that your model is acceptable to a necessary (even if not sufficient perhaps) group of clients to make it sustainable for you.

Could be many things including a fake profile if he’s otherwise well known Rewuesting a deposit when you’re in the building or near isnt so surprising (not asking for it before is however) since the main purpose of the deposit for many asking for it isn’t to safeguard money / protect against no shows - no matter how passionately some try to present it that way

for you maybe - and fine - clients and the market can respond but you can’t speak for the entire industry the market doesn’t agree with you and the market usually doesn’t lie have lost count of how many providers have asked for a deposit, I’ve said no, and they’ve removed that “non negotiable” position either instantly or over time sometimes after a harsh exchange (by when I’m not going to hire them)