BrickBuilder Posted June 18 Posted June 18 3 hours ago, coriolis888 said: While it is true what you say, when countless ads are false with so many things like the escorts age and size, just to name two items, why would you expect an escort to be honest about his health status? Will all clients on this site that have never once ever lied on any profile that they posted on (be it about age, height, weight, hair color, cock length, income level, employment status, relationship status, position preference, health status, eye color, shoe size, intent to actually meet/hire for real, etc.) please stand up and be counted..... Bueller.....Bueller....Bueller + SirBillybob and + Vegas_Millennial 2
+ ApexNomad Posted June 18 Posted June 18 1 hour ago, AtlTopGuy said: Will all clients on this site that have never once ever lied on any profile that they posted on (be it about age, height, weight, hair color, cock length, income level, employment status, relationship status, position preference, health status, eye color, shoe size, intent to actually meet/hire for real, etc.) please stand up and be counted..... Bueller.....Bueller....Bueller BrickBuilder and + SirBillybob 1 1
Archangel Posted June 18 Posted June 18 4 hours ago, coriolis888 said: While it is true what you say, when countless ads are false with so many things like the escorts age and size, just to name two items, why would you expect an escort to be honest about his health status? I can expect it. I should also expect lying so I protect myself too. + SirBillybob 1
+ SirBillybob Posted Saturday at 01:55 AM Posted Saturday at 01:55 AM (edited) On 6/18/2025 at 12:05 PM, coriolis888 said: While it is true what you say, when countless ads are false with so many things like the escorts age and size, just to name two items, why would you expect an escort to be honest about his health status? Good point. Yet why would one expect a propensity for health status distortion to be different according to commercial sex worker status compared to non-escort categories of sexual partners? Any type of endgame influences transparency in a similar fashion. Edited Saturday at 11:45 AM by SirBillybob pubic_assistance 1
+ SirBillybob Posted Saturday at 02:02 AM Posted Saturday at 02:02 AM (edited) On 8/2/2023 at 3:05 PM, coriolis888 said: I am not specifically exposing anyone. However, on rentmen during this year, one particular provider was "rentmen of the day" twice. That same escort has been advertising for many years on rentmen. Two years ago, his ad used to state that he was HIV +. Now, his ad does not say anything about his HIV + status. I believe some States in the U.S. require sex workers (and certain others) to disclose their HIV-positive status. There is a criminal penalty in those states for failure to disclose prior to a sex act with another person. I do not know if the person is using PREP which would somewhat expiate for his failure to be truthfully disclosed. I also do not know if the person verbally tells a potential client of his HIV status prior to any meeting. It was certainly shocking for me to see the "rentmen of the year" (twice for this same provider) omit his previously disclosed HIV status. The bottom line is do not believe everything that is written (or not written) in a provider's advertisement. Yet why would one emphasize top tier platform recognition in relation to suppositions about health status? There is no categorical tracking of health status accuracy that would contribute to a grade of worthiness … or lost qualification points … for such an honorific. I’m not sure what the criteria are for this pageant-grade practice but I think it’s shallow enough that any sign of shifting sands regarding what dropdown menu health status item is ticked off across time does not figure prominently. Edited Saturday at 11:51 AM by SirBillybob pubic_assistance 1
Constantine Posted Saturday at 01:23 PM Posted Saturday at 01:23 PM It would be great if rentmen required escorts to periodically upload test results with their name in order to access the option of putting negative on prep on their profiles. There's already an option for escorts to verify their IDs with rentmen so this isn't that much of an extra leap.
+ Vegas_Millennial Posted Saturday at 02:25 PM Posted Saturday at 02:25 PM 1 hour ago, Constantine said: It would be great if rentmen required escorts to periodically upload test results with their name in order to access the option of putting negative on prep on their profiles. There's already an option for escorts to verify their IDs with rentmen so this isn't that much of an extra leap. And while they're at it, RentMen should require any escort who advertises as "Safe Only" to mail in samples of used condoms to prove the escort is using condoms on every encounter! (I am joking 😄, as I hope others are too) pubic_assistance 1
NJF Posted Saturday at 08:09 PM Posted Saturday at 08:09 PM 5 hours ago, Vegas_Millennial said: And while they're at it, RentMen should require any escort who advertises as "Safe Only" to mail in samples of used condoms to prove the escort is using condoms on every encounter! (I am joking 😄, as I hope others are too) Are the crowds here so humorless that every joke has to be noted with an explicit disclaimer? + Vegas_Millennial and pubic_assistance 1 1
Constantine Posted Sunday at 02:56 AM Posted Sunday at 02:56 AM 12 hours ago, Vegas_Millennial said: And while they're at it, RentMen should require any escort who advertises as "Safe Only" to mail in samples of used condoms to prove the escort is using condoms on every encounter! (I am joking 😄, as I hope others are too) It's only a matter of time before there's a lawsuit against RM from a client who got infected despite a neg on prep listing. Frankly I am surprised that hasn't happened yet.
coriolis888 Posted Sunday at 06:59 AM Posted Sunday at 06:59 AM (edited) On 6/18/2025 at 9:05 AM, coriolis888 said: My final contribution to this matter is to copy what I just found on Google with respect to legal various states having different criminal laws for those who fail to disclose their HIV status: It can be illegal and result in felony charges in many US states for an HIV-positive person to solicit sex as a prostitute and claim they are HIV-negative, even if no transmission occurs. This is because some states have laws that criminalize HIV non-disclosure, especially in the context of sex work. Elaboration: HIV Criminalization: Many states have laws that criminalize the transmission or exposure of HIV, or the failure to disclose one's HIV-positive status to a sexual partner. Felony Charges: In some jurisdictions, engaging in sex work while HIV-positive can elevate a prostitution charge to a felony, regardless of whether HIV is transmitted. Intent to Deceive: Claiming to be HIV-negative while soliciting sex, even if not explicitly intending to transmit the virus, can be seen as an attempt to deceive and defraud, which can be a separate charge. No Intent Element: Some felony solicitation statutes do not require any intent to transmit HIV or any activity that could transmit the virus. Aggravated Prostitution: Some states have specific "aggravated prostitution" laws that criminalize sex work by someone who knows they are HIV-positive. Potential for Severe Penalties: Depending on the jurisdiction, these charges can result in significant prison sentences, even if no transmission occurred. Varying Laws: It is important to note that laws regarding HIV non-disclosure and its criminalization vary significantly by state. Edited Sunday at 07:01 AM by coriolis888 marylander1940 and pubic_assistance 1 1
marylander1940 Posted Sunday at 11:14 AM Posted Sunday at 11:14 AM 4 hours ago, coriolis888 said: My final contribution to this matter is to copy what I just found on Google with respect to legal various states having different criminal laws for those who fail to disclose their HIV status: It can be illegal and result in felony charges in many US states for an HIV-positive person to solicit sex as a prostitute and claim they are HIV-negative, even if no transmission occurs. This is because some states have laws that criminalize HIV non-disclosure, especially in the context of sex work. Elaboration: HIV Criminalization: Many states have laws that criminalize the transmission or exposure of HIV, or the failure to disclose one's HIV-positive status to a sexual partner. Felony Charges: In some jurisdictions, engaging in sex work while HIV-positive can elevate a prostitution charge to a felony, regardless of whether HIV is transmitted. Intent to Deceive: Claiming to be HIV-negative while soliciting sex, even if not explicitly intending to transmit the virus, can be seen as an attempt to deceive and defraud, which can be a separate charge. No Intent Element: Some felony solicitation statutes do not require any intent to transmit HIV or any activity that could transmit the virus. Aggravated Prostitution: Some states have specific "aggravated prostitution" laws that criminalize sex work by someone who knows they are HIV-positive. Potential for Severe Penalties: Depending on the jurisdiction, these charges can result in significant prison sentences, even if no transmission occurred. Varying Laws: It is important to note that laws regarding HIV non-disclosure and its criminalization vary significantly by state. Thanks for the information! I wonder if nowadays when there's a pill and an injection to prevent HIV those laws might be considered obsolete especially among gay men.
+ SirBillybob Posted Sunday at 11:26 AM Posted Sunday at 11:26 AM (edited) 21 hours ago, Vegas_Millennial said: And while they're at it, RentMen should require any escort who advertises as "Safe Only" to mail in samples of used condoms to prove the escort is using condoms on every encounter! (I am joking 😄, as I hope others are too) Edited Sunday at 11:26 AM by SirBillybob
+ SirBillybob Posted Sunday at 12:24 PM Posted Sunday at 12:24 PM (edited) 10 hours ago, Constantine said: It's only a matter of time before there's a lawsuit against RM from a client who got infected despite a neg on prep listing. Frankly I am surprised that hasn't happened yet. I think this is an important topic and you raise an interesting point about criminalization and culpability, as well as highlight the range of perspectives about it. However … Read their guidelines and implicit disclaimer. First of all, there is no imperative for a third party ad site to vet advertisers’ possible transmissible disease status. The clearly stated MO behind the dropdown menu is to convey that health-related communication is encouraged and is hoped to be deemed normative. To think that such messaging leaves an entity open to litigation is an idea that slides a bit up the scale of paradoxical absurdity. The antithesis of their approach is don’t talk don’t tell. If the field is empty or the ticked choice is to not answer or is unknown the fact that it's clearly optionally a completable menu facilitates an inquiry without the challenge of having to legitimize opening up a conversation. Such communication is not contractually obligatory on the part of the third party. They are setting up one aspect of health protection strategy. The pharmacy or ASO is not responsible or liable for the degree to which condom purchase or distribution leads to actual usage. Edited Sunday at 01:44 PM by SirBillybob
+ SirBillybob Posted Sunday at 12:39 PM Posted Sunday at 12:39 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, marylander1940 said: Thanks for the information! I wonder if nowadays when there's a pill and an injection to prevent HIV those laws might be considered obsolete especially among gay men. This is so complex because while you reference PrEP there is also the consideration of TasP, U=U, type of sex, condom use, prevention mix’n’match, diagnostic latency, etc. There are now so many variables that come into play regarding the question of the degree to which known HIV poz status non-disclosure truly vitiates consent, interpretation and variability among jurisdictions can surely be expected as legal implications catch up with HIV prevention and management evolution. In many cases the risk of cracking open one’s skull due to slipping on a carelessly left banana peel on the multi-level brothel stairs is greater than acquiring infection from the CSW. Edited Sunday at 01:03 PM by SirBillybob marylander1940 1
+ PhileasFogg Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago On 6/18/2025 at 2:23 PM, BrickBuilder said: Will all clients on this site that have never once ever lied on any profile that they posted on (be it about age, height, weight, hair color, cock length, income level, employment status, relationship status, position preference, health status, eye color, shoe size, intent to actually meet/hire for real, etc.) please stand up and be counted..... Bueller.....Bueller....Bueller 🙋🏻 me…no need to lie. The truth always becomes obvious if you do. Just avoid the crap and tell the truth. Life’s easier that way
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now