Is this vandalism?

[Guest]

I ran across a photo of Dustin McNeer, a man whose photos got some jizz out of me a few years ago, and thought I'd look him up now to see how he's been doing. Well, his body looks fantastic, but he's covered his body, including his neck, with tats! To me, that's like spray painting the Mona Lisa with graffiti. Can they arrest this man for vandalism? Desecration? All right, I'm just joking, and I'd still pay to do him, but I do think the tats are a shame... 😉

Before:

During:

Now:

[+ sync]

For me, even the "before" tats are too much.

Try as I might, I just can't get past tattoos or piercings, and considering their popularity, it looks like I'm in for a lot of downtime.

[spidir]

The tats are fine but too many clothes for such a stud. 😜

[MscleLovr]

Just my 2 cents…in my opinion, he spoiled his good looks. 

(There was an earlier thread about Dustin where I mentioned I met him years ago, when he was younger and on a visit to England. Then he was in need of financial support;   I’ve no idea about now)

[spider]

Not my cup of tea but it is his body... Remember when David Bromstead (sp?) was quite the hottie, now he looks like a clown, again it is his body.

[Boink]

A bit young and twinky in the first pic.  Then, ironically, the bigger and better his body got, the more he marred it with tattoos. I'll never understand.

Edited August 5, 2022 by Boink
spelling

[Bucky]

Wrapping a lacy doily, forever adorning the neck, is the latest fugly trend.

I'd dismiss these guys on the basis of atrociously bad judgement alone.  

Edited August 4, 2022 by Bucky

[Guest]

54 minutes ago, Bucky said:

Wrapping a lacy doily, forever adorning the neck, is the latest fugly trend.

I'd dismiss these guys on the basis of atrociously bad judgement alone.  

Talking about fugly trends, I just noticed that he seems to be wearing a pearl necklace in the last photo. Hopefully that's not just a tattoo! 😬

[+ RJD]

Not to go off topic, but if there’s anyone who has really gone overboard, it’s Michael Hoffman.  

This is before with just the one tattoo. I thought he was hot as hell, especially in his early jack-off videos.  

 

And now….

 

He has random tattoos on his legs of various cartoon characters including Popeye, which are distracting.  
 

I know, his body, his choice, but they don’t add to his appeal, at least for me. If anything, they detract from it.  He has an OF account and I would never subscribe because I can’t get past the graffiti. 

 

[+ Axiom2001]

He was mighty mouthwatering prior to all of those despicable tats.  I abhor innumerable tats that have been applied to one's beautiful skin!  😐

[wsc]

12 hours ago, Unicorn said:

I ran across a photo of Dustin McNeer, a man whose photos got some jizz out of me a few years ago, and thought I'd look him up now to see how he's been doing. Well, his body looks fantastic, but he's covered his body, including his neck, with tats! To me, that's like spray painting the Mona Lisa with graffiti. Can they arrest this man for vandalism? Desecration? All right, I'm just joking, and I'd still pay to do him, but I do think the tats are a shame... 😉

Before:

During:

Now:

I've said in other posts that tats on a beautiful man's body are like using the Mona Lisa as a Post-It note, but graffiti works as well, or better. I'd prefer none, but a small, discreet one might be reluctantly acceptable. However, the plethora displayed here, or on the aforementioned Mr. Hoffman, for example, are an instant disqualifier. Here, "each to his own," has limits.

[pubic_assistance]

Delicious to disgusting.

Sad how some people get obsessed with body art as if this will do anything to improve your looks. It doesn't.

[Phil_musc]

In later years, these guys in the above posts will have instant conversation starters in the retirement homes where they'll be living. They can explain what the tattoo was supposed to look like when the skin was young and supple. Then they can talk about how said "art" evolved into something else which maybe became almost frightening.

[KrisParr]

1 hour ago, pubic_assistance said:

Delicious to disgusting.

Sad how some people get obsessed with body art as if this will do anything to improve your looks. It doesn't.

So true. About 10 years ago, I was seeing a very hot escort who had a few tats that were tasteful and didn’t detract from his amazing body. However, he started adding more and more - with a dragon that wrapped from his back side around to the front. It was dark purple and green and actually was quite colorful. He moved across country, and I ran into him about two years ago at a hotel in the pool area. The hot body was still just as hot, but the many tats had faded and morphed into an almost unrecognizable smear of ink - it was painful to see what he’d done. Either the tat artists had used some shitty materials, or his body decided to revolt. As hot as he was, I don’t think I could get past the distraction.

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

It's his body.

If he's happy with it, that's really the only consideration.

[Guest]

41 minutes ago, BenjaminNicholas said:

It's his body.

If he's happy with it, that's really the only consideration.

Wrong! 😄 For desecrating your angelic body, I hereby sentence you to 6 months of being Unicorn and "Chris"'s sex slave!

[+ Pensant]

He was perfect in the first pic. Too many tattoos and excessive bodybuilding are two turnoffs for me.

[+ nycman]

Either way, I’d fuck him. 

[wsc]

18 hours ago, Phil_musc said:

In later years, these guys in the above posts will have instant conversation starters in the retirement homes where they'll be living. They can explain what the tattoo was supposed to look like when the skin was young and supple. Then they can talk about how said "art" evolved into something else which maybe became almost frightening.

A co-worker admitted that while in the Navy, during a tour of the Pacific, he'd gotten a tattoo on his abdomen, but wouldn't show it or describe it. So, the rest of us teased him about it, imagining that it started out as a sampan, then, as he aged and grew larger and larger in waist size -and he had quite a gut- it came to more resemble the USS Missouri. Seemed plausible given how much the skin had to stretch to accommodate his expansion.

[+ RJD]

11 hours ago, BenjaminNicholas said:

It's his body.

If he's happy with it, that's really the only consideration.

True, his body, his choice.  It’s also my money and my choice as to where I spend it.  It wouldn’t be to hire anyone who looks like that nor subscribe to their OF pages.  I doubt I’m alone in that thinking.  They can do whatever they’d like, but shouldn’t be surprised if their “body art” choices start cutting into their client/fan base and income.  

[NJF]

This may be an off topic question. What percentage of an escort’s clients are tattoo-hating old men? Just wondering out loud here. 

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

1 hour ago, RJD said:

True, his body, his choice.  It’s also my money and my choice as to where I spend it.  It wouldn’t be to hire anyone who looks like that nor subscribe to their OF pages.  I doubt I’m alone in that thinking.  They can do whatever they’d like, but shouldn’t be surprised if their “body art” choices start cutting into their client/fan base and income.  

Somehow, I think he'll survive without the money of those complaining here. 

[+ RJD]

2 minutes ago, BenjaminNicholas said:

Somehow, I think he'll survive without the money of those complaining here. 

Good.  I wish them all luck.  However, here is a tiny fraction of the number of men who participate in this hobby and/or subscribe to OF.  I doubt the opinions on this forum are that different, if at all, from the rest of those who aren’t on this forum.  

[wsc]

1 hour ago, NJF said:

This may be an off topic question. What percentage of an escort’s clients are tattoo-hating old men? Just wondering out loud here. 

Well, if you're talking about this escort, my guess of that percentage would be near to zero. 

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, BenjaminNicholas said:

Somehow, I think he'll survive without the money of those complaining here. 

Well, there's surviving and there's thriving. This man is not an accountant or a computer analyst. This is a man whose entire adult life has been centered on capitalizing on his good looks and smoking body, including when he was 19 and competed on America's Next Top Model. He has an OnlyFans page, from which I'd assume he hopes to make a good profit. Very obviously, it's not just the opinion of the people on this forum which matters, but also that of many others. There's no reason to assume that the opinions of the people on this forum are out of touch with those of others. 

No one would question his right to do what he wants to on his body. The pertinent question is whether it's wise for someone whose livelihood depends significantly on his looks to desecrate his body the way he has. There are some such as myself who can look beyond what he's done and still marvel at his smoking body and handsome face--not enough to subscribe to his OnlyFans, mind you. However, he's just tatted himself out of lot of fans, probably disqualified himself from most model jobs, and, with his neck tattoo, disqualified himself from many other jobs in the workplace. 

I remember going scuba diving a few years ago with a tatted divemaster (not as heavily tatted as Dustin McNeer). A young lady on the boat asked him about his tats, and he gave her wise advice: "Before you get a tattoo, just be sure you know your career path, and that the tats won't affect your livelihood." Mr. McNeer has definitely not followed that advice.