KensingtonHomo

But you're bi. I wouldn't "mercy" fuck anyone at this point in my life but when I did it wasn't any women.

That was him.

I think it's funny. I've been with this provider, and wouldn't repeat. DM me if you want details.

No, what has been happening is right-wingers are claiming a) that all drag is inherently sexual (which is ludicrous to anyone who has seen Milton Berle or Mrs. Doubtfire nevermind Nina West), and b) because it's inherently sexual, simply having drag queens interact with children - not matter how tame or age appropriate is corrupting. These same arguments were made about cis gay men and lesbians (and in some quarters still are) to oppress us and deny us our rights. If anything, people like Kirk Cameron enjoy MORE rights than the average drag queen, and they are definitely aiming to indoctrinate children to their values. I wish people who are defending Cameron or falling for the right-wing argument would wake up and see that this is a cynical campaign to erode support for queer people. First they came from the trans people, Then they came for the drag queens...

No religious beliefs are being repressed. Kirk Cameron is not being prevented from publishing his book, or having a book tour at private venues that are concordant with his beliefs. Do you think those calling for Cameron to be permitted to use public libraries to spread his right-wing religious beliefs would support a Muslim author with a children's book on sharia law?

I'm not being nasty or disrespectful. I'm pointing out that someone claiming knowledge of the Constitution doesn't, in fact, understand it or the history of precedents based upon it. You're trying to control the parameters of debate, by asserting that a simple statement is "nasty", which is a predictable strategy. It lines up perfectly with claims that drag queens are "sexualizing children" by dancing or reading books. A long judicial record affirms that public institutions cannot prioritize one religion over another, including providing space for an evangelical Christian to proselytize to children. For example, Roy Moore had to remove the Ten Commandments from his courtroom. To my knowledge, drag queen story hour does not proselytize about religion. Rather they read secular books that are often about children being free to explore their own identity and being respectful of differences, including those based on religion. Those are not my values. Those are the values on which this country was founded by people fleeing religious persecution.

So you don’t understand the Constitution. That’s okay. There are lots of books about it, but I’ll give you a hint: the key word is “establishment.”

Equal access ends when the person in question wants to impose their religion on others. Drag queens reading “Good Night Moon” is a secular activity, what Cameron was proposing was not. My presumptions are based on my experiences. You’d be surprised what gets overlooked when a venue is repurposed. 8 year olds will likely giggle at the sign. SCOTUS said Roe was settled law, and look how that turned out. And they’re looking at challenges to Ogberfell just like they’re granting hearings to cases that would allow businesses to discriminate against queer people.

We all know this was an oversight doing a family-focused event at a venue that is typically for adults. Depending on the age of the children, they will either laugh about it or not understand the reference. Either way, it's irrelevant to everyone except the parents of the children who were in attendance. What's remarkable about those arguing in defense of KC is that "drag" or "trans sports" or what have you is a smoke screen for attacking all queer people. SCOTUS is aiming to repeal marriage equality. Drag queens are the warm-up act.

People arguing for their rights - particularly those guaranteed in The Constitution, such as Freedom FROM religion - need not be tolerant of religious zealots trying to impose their so-called values on the rest of us. I'm not interested in acceptance or tolerance from right-wingers or Christian fascists. I want the state to ensure their beliefs are kept to the private sphere. They used to claim to want that, too, but - as you see with Kirk Cameron - he wants to use public spaces to indoctrinate children. I have my beliefs, morals and ethics. I'm not seeking to impose them on anyone else. If I take my nephew to a drag queen story hour, that's between me and his parents, not the GOP, Ben Shapiro or our elected officials.

So sad. He was so young.

I'm gay and mostly a bottom. And I do not understand the obsession with penises, particularly guys who want 11 inches. Like others have said, I am much more into a handsome face, a shapely body or varying sizes, and - honestly - really nice legs than the penis. I really love my husband's penis. I feel like it's a "Goldilocks" penis, "just right." But I'm completely disinterested in like "disembodied" penises like dick pics. Like when I see just dicks on Rent.men profile, I generally don't click.

We were there in May and most guys were charging $250 CAN.

This may be true when it comes to normal inflation, but the current inflation is due in part to supply chain issues due to the pandemic, but it's mostly being just driven by corporate greed. The Fed raised interest rates to discipline labor, just as the Biden administration and Congress stepped in to discipline the railroad workers. Neither of these steps is sustainable as people will respond to government-imposed immiseration by electing fascists in 2024 or civil unrest.

What made you not want to repeat?

Ya got me gal! I meant gender nonconforming.

I have literally zero interest in a self-involved, delusional Gen Zer, who clearly wants to be a trophy "wife."

While there is a biological drive in most people to reproduce, that has nothing to do with sex for pleasure or recreation. I recommend a book called "Sex at Dawn", which argues that pre-agriculture, as we were living in nomadic tribes for 30-50 people, sex was had for pleasure between members of the same and opposite sex. And children were raised by the tribe as a whole because while they knew who the mother was, they didn't know who the father was. It's very interesting.

I don't disagree with that. I think without being socialized into heterosexuality, we'd have a lot more queer people of all stripes.

"Queer" is an umbrella term for sexual and gender minorities. Bisexuals are includes as are gays, lesbians, trans people, polyamorous folks, BDSM, etc. I often refer to myself as queer because I'm a GNC male who has sex with men.

I would be very put off by the OP described. I don't get the sense that most people posting here are fabulously wealthy, so hiring is an indulgence that we enjoy and probably need to budget for. I am definitely open to providers we've seen before contacting us when they're in town. Sometimes it works financially and timing-wise, and that's awesome. Occasionally, I'll get what seems to be a "broadcast" text from a couple of providers who are offering discounts for massage in a certain period. Those are fine too. I have some regulars I follow and who follow me on Insta. But when I'm looking to hire I text them directly. Because even though we're friendly, it's still a business relationship.

I can’t get past the Amish beard 😂

When I tell people how tight I am it’s both a gloat and complaint. 😂

We saw Oliver. And he was good but not great. My first issue is an hour before we were to meet, he requested we send him a car. I generally don't do that. I prefer providers build costs into their price rather than ask for something al la carte. He was a good kisser. He has a great body and is quite furry if you're into that. He looks exactly like his photos, but he is shorter than advertised. I'd say he's maybe 5'10 because I'm 5'11" and he wasn't my height. He took a while to get "going" and then seemed to have to kindle the fire so to speak. In terms of topping (and here's where my main letdown was) he only had one speed which was rather rapid. I don't mind a good pounding as long as there are other strokes on the menu. He's headed to Miami next. Not sure we'd repeat.

While I've been bottoming for a minute, based on my experience, these are three potential options. My caveat is you should be forthright that it's your first time. And ask for more lube than you can possibly think you'll need. Also, if it's your first time prepping, do it at least an hour before. I've found if I to it closer to that, I'm overly sensitive. https://rent.men/NYWolfman He's hung but he's very sensual and very good about getting ready. He really knows how to wait for you to open up. And he's a great communicator so if something doesn't feel right, he'll respect you and take a break if needed. Also, a very interesting guy who's fun to talk to. https://rent.men/JonahWheeler Jonah is one of my absolute faves. He's very intuitive. His endowment is more on the average size, which may help. It's kind of Goldilocks dick: not too big, not too small. But, again, I really think it's that he listens and responds to what the client needs. He's also just very warm and sweet with a side of devilishness. https://rent.men/Nickhalden Also a very nice guy. A bit more introverted. He offers erotic massages that can turn into fucking. Especially if it's your first time, having someone who really warms you up and is sensual and relaxing can really help. He also has Goldilocks dick. PM me if you want more details.