DrownedBoy

The most annoying is when they're a couple and the guy you wants insists you hire their partner.

Hey, sometimes it happens so quickly you don't have a choice 😉

My personal answer. No.

I was waiting for the companies to pull out. Values have never trumped profits for that long. A lot of German corporations threw their Jewish employees under the bus when contracts were on the line.

Believe me - many "bisexual" escorts (and practically all the G4P ones) came into the business thinking they'd work with women, only to be hit hard by supply and demand. They'd muuuuch rather be meeting with women. Remember that if you decide to hire. You have an advantage.

While the idea of being tied to a post and whipped until I'm half dead has an appeal, it wouldn't be good for my skin.

Let's see....cutting of federal arts funding....a recession...

Okay, I have a question for providers. I know (because I asked this forum earlier) that rates have to be adjusted up when couples hire a single provider. How does the pricing work when n is equal to or greater than 3?

Dancers don't make much money, and they're about to start making less. Since a good proportion are gay, hopefully they'll decide to go into this business.

You don't do stuff like this in public...

I'd be happy to return to around 1990, slightly before I hit puberty. I'd want to look as I did at 18 (barely legal), and have a steady stream of all the hot celebritiy guys I thought about back then.

It's more fair to say that lots of RM ads are only there to sell their OF subscriptions. I often get auto responses with a link to their OF.

I don't mind their maturity as long as they come on time, don't say anything insulting, and do what I say. A lot can't handle even that.

He's on my maybe list.

Complete phony. I once tried to book him (EDIT when he was on FB and before that obnoxious RM ad), and we agreed to a time. Then, he texts and tells me he changed his mind and decided to watch TV with friends, but he'd be willing to meet after the TV show. I immediately told him he was unprofessional and blocked him. What a moron.

Truly straight providers are much more likely to be scammers or leave you hanging. We've had enough experiences mentioned in this forum - including mine - showing what happens when the straight boy shows up and suddenly decides he's not able to do all the things he agreed to beforehand.

Yes, that's a thing. It's especially annoying when my favorite travelling provider comes in for a couple days in the middle of the week, when I'm working and don't have time to meet. A lot of escorts have a long list of 1-day stopovers (like 1 day in NYC, followed by 1 day in Boston, etc). When I've contacted them, several say that they only plan on going to said city if they book a customer ahead of time. So, you might ask them about that.

Moaning bottom with a grunting top partner. The grunt doesn't sound sexy, but's it's useful so I can prepare to swallow.

I don't tip either (EDIT except for a certain bodybuilder who massively exceeded expectations). And if you do tip, don't make it obvious.

Sorry - confidentiality is a thing, and I'm not looking for another sugar daddy.

I do joint showers when dating (but not hiring), and it's cute, but also a little awkward if you're actually trying to get clean. I love how we have to keep switching positions so we can both get the hot water. Oh - and the moment someone drops a bar of soap, wait for all the expected comments.

I had an "older boyfriend" in college who helped with the expenses, who was about 40 years older than me, and who I would not have dated unless he was giving financial assistance to me. Call that what you will. I have no problem dealing with one person, like a sugar daddy. I don't date people who are supermodels, so I've learned to find attraction in people who aren't conventionally attractive. But I'd have trouble meeting different people all the time.

Reddit is too deep a rabbit hole - I used it a little during the pandemic, then removed it from my phone. It's just too time consuming, and impossible to hold a real discussion on anything.

The "source" mentioned here is completely irreliable.

(That was the implication)