DrownedBoy

Translation: let the people eat cake.....er, I mean kale. Increased preventative care is indeed a great idea, and will save health care costs (and health). It's also something lots of insurance companies won't cover. Not everyone has money for vegan diets, gym memberships, etc.

I'm sure the trial will be perfectly fair. After all, the suspect is a pure blood Sicilian. From a very large and wealthy Sicilian family. (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14181643/luigi-mangione-bullying-tycoon-grandpa-mafia-ties-revealed.html) A family so powerful it has relatives in the Penn. statehouse and a real estate empire. And the suspect just happened to know how to kill someone and escape from NYC, and it's doubtful he would have gotten caught except for a single face shot someone recognized. Perfectly straightforward trial....

Grindr, last year, mainly verbatim. My words definitely were - especially my use of the word "kid." The "twink" had no photos which is why I wasn't interested. Could have been in his 50s for all I know. This is why my Grindr filter only allows people aged 35+ to show up. Not a twink lover here.

When money is involved, the only thing I worry about is the size of their wallet.

Strange. Whenever I find young guys looking for "daddies" on Grindr, there's always money involved. Let me recount a Grindr conversation I had when a 19-year-old contacted me. TWINK: Hello! ME: Not interested. TWINK: But I'm into daddies! I like older guys! ME: Look, kid - if you're into older guys at your age, make sure you find ones who have lots of money. TWINK: I already made 20K. ME: Good work!

Dude you lost that bet a few days ago 😆 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna180775

No, he just needs one brave citizen with common sense who understands the difference between the letter and spirit of the law.

Acting and intimacy are also 2 different things. I know providers can help clients feel good about themselves, but as long as money is involved, it's dangerous to open yourself to intimacy. It's enough to form a friendly business arrangement. I have a regular I've seen for 8 years, and one main reason is that we both understand that it's a paid encounter that he doesn't find arousing. Nonetheless, he goes out of his way to arouse me. That's why he's still a regular.

Only some of the ones that providers themselves came up with. Some of them are physically nontransferable 😄

If you lived in the 18th century, you'd probably be scolding Washington, Franklin, Jefferson, et. al., that war isn't the answer. 🙄

One more interesting one I came up with recently was the "big guy forces himself on innocent virgin." I was yelling things like, "No, don't, I was never with a guy before....it hurts....ahhhhhh!!!!..." etc. He asked if I was worried about the neighbors hearing it. I told him that if my neighbors were listening, they'd roll their eyes because it was probably the 15th time someone took my virginity like that. EDIT: To clarify, this particular RP is not limited to providers....

There will always be a handful of young, immature brats who think they can make it as an escort by only going for younger attractive people. They're not professional. A professional will help you feel good and better around yourself. (besides, an experienced provider here was doing guys in their 90s when he was in his 20s)

It'll be awhile before the whole story comes out. Initial impression= a bratty SJW warrior who wanted to make a name for himself. Later impression= he had back surgery, leaving him with chronic pain, at which point he stopped talking to friends and family. And his parents got rich running nursing homes. This is something the jury is going to have to figure out. Sounds complicated.

Hey - one sociopath kills another. Everyone wins.

Damnit, what was that remark about guys we shouldn't find hot 😜

I'm leaving that judgment up to a jury, although I can say how I'd vote as a NYC juror. If he shot the guy just to get famous, or he's just some SJW fanatic without a horse in the race, I'd say send him to death row. If he shot the guy because he was denied coverage, or a loved one was, I'd say it was temporary insanity brought on by the stress of dealing with UHC's illegal and dangerous coverage practices. If he turns out to be a mental patient who had psychiatric care denied by UHC, I'd laugh my ass off, as would most of the country. In that case, it would probably be in everyone's interest to say he's unfit for trial and send him to a hospital.

My favorite roleplaying involves being dominated (the more complete, the better). I lost track of the scenarios, but I'm always coming up with new ones. So do some providers. Although the acting is sometimes so bad that we both end up laughing.

That is so rich coming on this site, dedicated to a hobby almost universally illegal according to the "law of the land"

Many of my regulars have told me "crazy client" stories, although I'd say they fall more into the "extremely weird" or "drunk and high" category than a genuine mental illness. Likewise, I met providers who have psychiatric problems and see therapists on their own. And I've texted many who responded in a way indicating that they weren't "all there," including several cases of explosive anger. I've seen studies indicating that sex workers are more likely to have psychiatric problems, but it's often caused by something other than their jobs. Nonetheless, legalization and destigmitization would help the mental health on both sides.

Dude - read the news. The CEO and his wife were separated. They didn't even live in the same house anymore. They separated after he was arrested for a DUI. I wouldn't expect an outpouring of grief from a woman in that situation. EDIT The CEO kept the separation secret so it wouldn't hurt his career. The family wasn't exactly held together via affection, All this blabbering about the death of a "husband and father of two kids" is public relations hogwash.

Better yet - people recognize him and don't call the cops. As far as I'm concerned, his only crime is littering for leaving trash on the street.

If he went to LA to be an actor, I'm sure he's still offering these services there.

It was aimed specifically at a health care exec. See what he wrote on the bullets.

He'll look telegenic if he ever gets to trial.

The CEO was under active investigation for insider trading. The charge was that he sold off his stocks once he knew the government was investigating his firm....for its constant denial of coverage! I have little to no empathy for this guy. He got rich while many customers were suffering and dying. My firm switched to and from UHC for one year because of their crappy coverage. The final karma - he was pronounced dead at a hospital that, in a big news story recently, pulled out of the UHC network because they were so bad 😆 However, the story seems fishy. The killer acted like a professional - used a silencer, shot in the open without any hesitation or nervousness (even when his gun jammed - which is common with silencers), knew the right spots to hit in a guy's back to kill him, and threw off the cops by pretending he was using a publicly tracked bike. The words on the shell casings could be just to throw the cops off. If they catch the killer alive and he shows to have a moral motive (like a child who died after a UHC denial), mark my words - he'll become the Kyle Rittenhouse of the far left and won't lack for attorney fees. (And if that was truly the motive, as a juror, I'd say it was justifiable homicide, or temporary insanity.) EDIT And hopefully the CEO's death will encourage other health insurance executives to change the way they do business. Security can't cover everyone.