coriolis888

I wonder if this glamorous travel schedule is with/for already-arranged clients or fishing for business......
22 Feb - Feb 27 Abu Dhabi, UAE 06 Mar - Mar 10 Playa del Carmen, Mexico 27 Mar - Mar 31 New York City, NY 11 Apr - Apr 14 Dubai, UAE 18 Apr - Apr 21 Maui, HI

Or they just steal the bio text from other guys' ads.  After all, they steal pix so stealing text is no big deal.

I took the plunge and met up with him. Unfortunately it was a very disappointing experience (although he does look like his photos). I cannot recommend him and I won't be repeating.

I was wishing for a fast forward button like on VCRs of old.

I might be naive, but scammers don’t usually ad this useless disclaimer- “
** NOTE : I am a professional and professional bodybuilder not a prostitute!!! Any fees paid, or money exchanged is for my companionship. Anything else that may or may not happen is a personal choice between two consenting adults of legal age.”

A real blast from the past.
Pro: As the other posters said, he's very nice and sweet. Also pretty much up for anything. Gay4Real.
Con: Ricky was 35 years old when I last saw him 10 years ago. Do the math. And he's also using the same photos he used 10 years ago.
BTC
 

" - - because these guys know we dont have another (legal) recourse if they just bail."

Greed causes that with lots of escorts
 

the very VERY least you could do, for stealing over $1000, is give him the worst one-star review ever on RM. most people dont read companyofmen, but they read and respond accordingly to bad reviews on RM. 
also, in my humble opinion, he isnt worth $100 lol. but to each their own. sorry he stole your money! i dont know if its commonplace to give deposits but i never do it, especially because these guys know we dont have another (legal) recourse if they just bail.

He’s looking for a Daddy to buy him LV and Gucci. Probably spends hours looking at himself like Narcissus. You can do better in LA.

.
And I’m saying the link works for me as it is!
 
Yes, I could’ve and should’ve pasted it again within the text body of my OP but the link in the title at the top of this page does work. I don’t know why it doesn’t work for you.

... If you copy and paste it. If you had pasted it in the text rather the title it would have worked as an actual link. That was what the others were saying, not that it wasn't a valid URL.

You know Daddy would be very mad at you right now for breaking the rules about making and other than English language post. My feeling is that he may have forgiven you just this once.

Still like the old one better.

I'm sure there are plenty of clients who show up without showering well in advance, but the same can be said about some providers.  I've had a few that obviously did not freshen up between clients and a couple that were absolutely filthy....and yet still expected me to pay $300+.   I'm not giving the provider a break in these situations.  Sorry.  Soap and water are cheap.  We all have issues.  

I read through all the three pages of this thread. I must be blind or else I need my eyes checked because I never saw a link to the site that is being discussed nor did I see a full name of the site so that I could do a search for the site address.
 
Question, what is the name of the site and is there a link? Thanks in advance.
-

Great - job well done.
 
I cannot even guess how much revenue they would have lost if they had kept that invasive rule for customers of their site.

If the provider is untruthful about his photos (using fake photos) and his physic not being like the photos in the ad, how can he be trusted?  Putting fake photos in an ad is an old trick by dishonest guys.  
The French had an old expression which mildly applies here:
"He who would steal an egg would steal a cow." 
In short, why go with a provider that uses fake photos?

I use the initial phone conversation to rule out a crackhead and/or queen.
When asked to do a phone conversation, most don't.

Seriously ?
There are far too many scammers in the business who make money by collecting deposits and never showing up.
NEVER pay a deposit to book ..would be MY advice.
Sorry

No one mentioned one issue with rentmen and texting and phone calls.
To have a client's review accepted and printed in the provider's ad, if a client cannot "prove" that they "met" the provider, and by "proof" rentmen wants to see some communication on the rentmen site that the provider and client actually communicated with one another. 
For rentmen's reasons, a client's review will not be accepted by rentmen unless there is some communication on the rentmen site between the provider and the client.  
I recently had a conversation with a rentmen exec in Germany about another issue.  The exec admitted that the communication requirement on rentmen is not "fool proof" that the provider and client met but there is another reason (too long to go into now) that makes rentmen require at least one "back and forth" chat on the rentmen site between the provider and client.  
So, unless you do not plan to write a review or if the provider does not care about reviews, rentmen communication is not important.   If you or the provider want a review, at least start the communication with a rentmen chat of sorts.   Then you can switch to text or another form of communication.   
I know for a fact that when a provider has a huge number of positive reviews, clients are more likely to hire the provider that has many positive reviews versus a provider with zero or only one or two reviews.  

Despite what you wrote above, too many providers still accept a client knowing they are tired or cannot perform well. 
Nonetheless, the provider expects money even though the provider is having a bad day and the provider knows that the meeting will likely end up disappointing for the client. 
Regardless, the provider accepts or demands full payment for rotten service received by the client.    
No question, escorting is not the same as buying a product from a store or reputable company.  In many cases, escorting has gotten out of hand, pricewise and non delivery as agreed. 
Most providers now want payment up front because the provider knows he likely cannot deliver as agreed with the client. 
It is a shame that the rentmen reviews narratives are blocked to U.S. users.  Reading the narratives tells you a lot about many providers that do not care whether the client is treated fairly. 
However, there is a way to read the rentmen narratives even though the narratives are usually blocked to U.S. readers.   Reading the narratives is helpful as a guide to the likihood of compatibility. 
Several months ago I posted a link that will allow Americans to access rentmen narratives as though the clients' computer was in Europe.  That way, the rentmen narratives are not blocked. 
Read the narratives on providers of interest.  Sometimes you get a big surprise by reading the narrratives. 
To simplify accessing the rentmen narrative bypass, here is the link again:
 hide.me/en/proxy
 
When the link opens,  copy the providers' review page link in the space asked for in the hide.me link shown above. 
Happy reading.
 

Rentmen declines reviews unless there is confirmation that you have communicated with the provider.  Rentmen's way to prove communication is through rentmen chat.  
Many providers avoid chat because they plan to give lousy service and they know that a review will be declined if the chat function was not used.  
Therefore, initially, on first contact, use rentmen chat to and from the provider if you plan to write a review of your experience.  Some providers (only a few, fortuneately) plan to give bad service or get your money without performing agreed services.  In short, try to use the rentmen chat function. 
If the provider refuses to use rentmen chat, that should be a possible red flag if the provider specifically tells you not to use chat in any form.  Texting is fine AFTER you first use the chat function to establish to rentmen that you communicated with the provider.  
Otherwise, the provider could get your money and not perform or worse.  
And, the provider would not have the deserved bad reviews show on his ad.  

No one mentioned one issue with rentmen and texting and phone calls.
To have a client's review accepted and printed in the provider's ad, if a client cannot "prove" that they "met" the provider, and by "proof" rentmen wants to see some communication on the rentmen site that the provider and client actually communicated with one another. 
For rentmen's reasons, a client's review will not be accepted by rentmen unless there is some communication on the rentmen site between the provider and the client.  
I recently had a conversation with a rentmen exec in Germany about another issue.  The exec admitted that the communication requirement on rentmen is not "fool proof" that the provider and client met but there is another reason (too long to go into now) that makes rentmen require at least one "back and forth" chat on the rentmen site between the provider and client.  
So, unless you do not plan to write a review or if the provider does not care about reviews, rentmen communication is not important.   If you or the provider want a review, at least start the communication with a rentmen chat of sorts.   Then you can switch to text or another form of communication.   
I know for a fact that when a provider has a huge number of positive reviews, clients are more likely to hire the provider that has many positive reviews versus a provider with zero or only one or two reviews.  

I dont understand why the profile wasn't part of the first post.   Can some one share it?
thanks