maninsoma

Many of the photos under the name AlanStud in New York which apparently recently became inactive are now under the name LatinoStudX. There were a thread where someone asked about Alanstud and many others, but no one offered any feedback on him. One of the photos also appeared in a few different blogs last year, but both of those blogs were just someone's collection of a variety of sexy men so the appearance on those blogs doesn't mean anything. I could swear he's been discussed before under another name, but the above is all my reverse-image-searching revealed. I didn't find any information searching by the phone number listed in his ad or the name given with the phone number, StudX.

I would say a younger man would have a lot to lose if he has "reckless" sex. If anything, he might have more to lose in the sense that he has more of his life to live and that wouldn't be fun to do that in prison or with a sex offender registry hanging over one's head. Yes, a younger man might not yet have a career to lose but I'd say that's the least of one's worries if one is going after underage guys on Grindr.

I haven't checked out OnlyFans. I created an account but they won't even let me browse who the content providers are unless I give them my credit card information. No, thanks. I do have a Just For Fans account and have subscribed to three pages. The first one kept me interested for half a year, but then I began wishing for higher quality production values. (A lot of the videos didn't even have cum shots that were visible, and many of them were shot with poor lighting.) I am in the middle of a 3-month subscription to another guy's page but I've already canceled the autorenew since he just doesn't post enough new content to make subscribing worthwhile. I subscribed to a third guy's page for just a 5-day intro deal and got bored on day 2 -- a lot of his posts were just the same clips you might find on PornHub, e.g., teasers for full scenes available on other pay sites. Not a good value and I'm not interested in seeing edited scenes.

I'm not sure how to interpret your comment. Are you saying that men should stop having sex entirely at a certain age? If so, what's the fatal number?

Thanks for the tip. I will have to remember entering the MF ID Number in a search when someone has chosen a name that's too short to search by. I will pass on this guy given the back and forth in the previous discussion about him, though it seems like at least some of the time at least some of the photos he's used under his various names have been him. Quite an odd back-and-forth in the previous thread, though.

This guy is handsome as can be. Has anyone hired him? https://www.masseurfinder.com/massage-therapists/29980/#

From cute twink to twunk. I agree -- he's looking very good. And how refreshing that he isn't all tatted up and is clean shaven. Woof!

I would at least think that the comment would be removed. I posted a joke gif (nothing sexual) that had a kid in it and it was removed. This post was a direct suggestion to violate federal law in order to have sex with children. Strange that none of the moderators have yet picked up that it isn't smart to have content posted that suggests people should travel to other countries to sex have sex with minors.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/extraterritorial-sexual-exploitation-children

Yes, I remember reading about a decade ago about some San Francisco man who regularly traveled to Thailand for "sex tourism." He was prosecuted in the United States for having sex with teens under the age of 18 while in Thailand. I don't remember the details (e.g., how he was detected by law enforcement either in Thailand or the U.S.), but he was facing significant charges at home.

I finally read the review and am perplexed by it having been posted. Apart from the warning from the reviewer to potential clients that maybe they will have their sessions cut short because the owner or leaseholder of the residence will come home and interrupt a session, I don't see how it has any bearing on Rainer's service. As to whether the scenario that's described in the review is plausible, I can see how something like that could happen among people with poor boundaries. Rainer could have been using another guy's apartment for business and then got a request for a booking during a time he couldn't use that place, so the friend he was with said, "Here, use my friend's place since he's out of town." At any rate, none of us knows whether what was written is true or just an attempt to smear Rainer. Speaking as a client, I wouldn't let a review like that dissuade me from hiring someone if that was the only negative piece of information I had on the guy. If true, it definitely shows a lack of consideration but since we don't know whether it's true I wouldn't give the allegations a lot of weight.

I've now skipped around and watched more of it. I finally did see all of the gender fluidity on display, though it didn't bother me. I don't mind seeing a hot guy in drag as long as he isn't in drag while filming scenes. (I don't like heavy make up on guys while filming, and I don't enjoy scenes where guys are wearing women's stockings.) There were plenty of guys wearing typical male attire, and many of them looked really hot in their well-fitting suits.

I'm not debating the merits of these sting operations, but it's logical to assume that these people would have, in fact, met a minor had the person they had been chatting with actually been a minor versus an undercover law enforcement officer. I mean, it isn't like this guy only chatted with someone he believed to be a young teen. He showed up at an agreed upon location expecting to meet the minor he had been chatting with.

Having felt ripped off in the past because of the same assumption you are making, let me state clearly: Price is no indication of what kind of service you are likely to receive. It may be indicative of an image the advertiser wants the create, but it doesn't necessarily equate with either better therapeutic skills or a greater degree of eroticism.

While I don't think most would believe that this guy was looking to meet this made-up, under-18 male for nonsexual reasons, this story does make me sad in that an older gay male was instrumental in me coming out when I was only 16, and he had no ulterior motives beyond helping other gay men (he ran a counseling center). This was in the '70s. I fear that our culture has become so reactionary today that it's unlikely any adults would be willing to take such a risk, and that's just sad. That being said, crusing on Grindr is not the equivalent of running a hotline and offering to talk with someone struggling with sexual orientation issues.

I initially just laughed off your post as a joke, but I just scrolled through all of the pages of listings on Rentmen in San Francisco. Your description is not far off for many of the ads that I saw. I do think that the percentage of men escorting whom I find attractive has decreased, but I think that the elimination of Craigslist as a source of men changed the game for some types of guys, namely those who just wanted to dabble in this a bit and not establish a highly visible, ongoing presence as an escort.

I watched a bit just now. My observations (admittedly I jumped around because I didn't find it that interesting): Kathy Griffin just seemed to be making up jokes on the spot based on porn studio names and titles. I guess they didn't pay her enough to actually spend time coming up with material in advance. Some of her jokes were funny, but most of it just fell flat. I only watched the first few awards being presented, but I didn't notice any gender fluidity. What I did notice was Alex Mecum's floodpants (at least that's what they used to be disparagingly referred to). I guess this is in fashion now since I've recently been seeing some attractive men wearing pants that end a few inches above their ankles, but I don't get it. Family Dick getting best "niche" studio? Even the nominees in that category left me perplexed, but Family Dick winning anything makes no sense unless you like your porn with mostly faked cum shots.

I hate insane levels of age shaving and wouldn't knowingly hire a guy claiming to be 39 when he's actually 20 years older, but if he still looks like the guy photographed by the car I say SEXY. Too bad he cannot just accept reality in terms of his age. I'm sure the market is much larger for guys around 40 than guys around 60, but aren't there enough guys who would hire him, looking like that, even if they knew his real age?

Just so someone who didn't see my post doesn't think I posted something sexual with a kid in it, I posted a joke clip from a well known TV show where the catch phrase is has the name Willis in it. I had no idea that a silly clip like that was not allowed here. Mea culpa.

Just so someone who didn't see my post doesn't think I posted something sexual with a kid in it, I posted a joke clip from a well known TV show where the catch phrase is has the name Willis in it. I had no idea that a silly clip like that was not allowed here. Mea culpa.

I'm the one who posted in the other thread that I thought he might have lived in San Francisco a decade ago, escorting under the name Grayson. I just looked at the current ad under the Jaime name and these photos are definitely not of the same person I met as Grayson, so either that previous ad featured someone else's photos, BoyJaime was not formerly BoyGrayson or I was simply mistaken when I wrote my previous post.

Please don't post pictures of children!

Already two active threads here on this. Maybe an admin can merge them into one?

It's nice to be "grandfathered in" to a rate, but I don't begrudge someone needing to increase his rates over time. What I don't understand is someone thinking his client base will automatically be comfortable with a 20 or 25% increase. I've never received a pay raise anywhere close to that percentage; only when I've changed jobs has my salary increated that much at one time. For the extremely well off, it might not matter whether the rate increase is $50 or more per hour. For many of us, that may move a provider too far away from what we can justify spending on this activity.

Interesting articles -- thanks for posting the links. I guess I was under a similar impression as Mr. Higgins -- I thought that pornography had a greater legal status in the United States by the late 1970s.