maninsoma

Looks like a new ad. Phone number would indicate that he either lives or used to live in the Los Angeles area, but the ad says San Francisco is his location. Three cute photos but not much else to go on. https://rentmasseur.com/Bodywhisperer

I think you missed my point, which is that it's logical to assume that both porn performers and escorts are likely to have a lot of sex partners. I wouldn't assume that an escort is less "overused" (your word, not mine) than a porn performer.

I understand that point of view, even if the point about being "overused" really isn't logical since a successful escort is going to have also been with a lot of other people. It just isn't in front of a camera so you don't know who the other people are or what kind of sex the escort had with them.

Click the Reviews link at the top of this forum and you will be taken to https://www.companyofmen.org/escorts/ . Not formatted the same as the legacy site, but I think the information is still there.

This is Jason Momoa in his Baywatch days. I can get the interest in him when he looked like this, but not his current disheveled look.

Is there a certain "type" you are looking for in terms of age, build, etc?

You are not the only one who finds the younger, less muscular Stu more attractive. Stu has been discussed here before and there were at least a few of us who expressed that point of view. I like muscular guys, but the ones who become competition-level huge don't do anything for me sexually.

There is men-on-men sex on a submarine just like there is in penal institutions. Most of the men probably don't identify as gay, but when there is no chance for sex with a woman there are some men who will certainly have sex with a man rather than only masturbating. I would share details about how I know about either of these things but I don't want to share stories here with too much personally identifying information.

When the video was first released, I saw two versions. One of them begins with a very clear view of the flight attendant's work badge and shows the guy's face clearly. The other also shows the guy's face. I assume that if you worked with the guy, you would easily be able to identify him based on either of those videos.

Jason Momoa after his Baywatch days. I don't get the appeal at all. Joe Manganiello after he grew his hair out. Yes, I hate long hair on men, particularly if they also have scruffy beards.

True. I just don't know anyone who looked in the mirror at age 35 and thought what was being reflected back was old looking. They might have had other self-esteem issues related to looks, but it wasn't because they were already looking old.

I'm pretty sure where I live, once someone has occupied a place for 30 consecutive days they have certain tenant rights afforded to them, even if they are just a guest in your home or are supposedly a short-term renter from a site like AirBnB. If that's the case where the OP lives, he should make sure his guest visits his parents at least once per month, spending the weekend there. That along with his travel for work (which presumably means he stays in hotels while traveling) should prevent him from gaining tenant status. I'm not an attorney, however, so if the OP is concerned about that then he should consult someone experienced in landlord-tenant law where he lives.

Wow, 35 and 40 and already stressing about their ages? That might play well to some gay men (and I've known a few who seemed age obsessed from fairly young ages), but my experience is that plenty of guys in their thirties and forties who are "hot" are still viewed as "hot" and so aren't stressed about aging. As someone nearing 60, I'd say that the stress about aging seems to surface for many after they hit 50, not mid-thirties or 40.

I assume that some of the firefighters or marines in the documentaries you find arousing are gay but I gather you assume they must all be straight given this thread's title, so maybe there is something psychological worth looking at. As for being bored by porn, not everyone finds it arousing. As far as I know, there is a fair amount of "gay for pay" types in gay porn so I don't think you can equate men having sex with men in front of the camera as not being attracted by gay men; rather it's not enjoying watching men have sex with each other. Is that because of internalized homophobia or are you just bored by porn? That's for you to look inside and figure out.

Take this with a grain of salt, but I am wondering whether this guy used to advertise under different names. He looks like an older version of a guy I arranged an appointment with about a decade ago who was visiting San Francisco from southern California. I looked at that guy's photos (when I make an appointment with someone, I always save the photos from their ads on my hard drive so that I can refresh my recollection in the future about guys I've hired) and he looks like a younger version of this guy. Maybe someone else will remember the guy who used to advertise as Brenden, Branson and Bestcort9 and chime in as to whether they think this is the same guy. At any rate, I never met the other guy because he was a no show -- one of my most infuriating experiences since I've had very few no-shows and he was the first. Not great to spend a lot of time/effort prepping to bottom and then having a provider ghost you. In addition to not showing up, he didn't reply to my messages asking whether he was still coming or, later, what happened. I'd like to be told I'm mistaken about this guy being the same person as PhysiqueStud looks handsome and I'd rather believe he's a legit provider who knows how to satisfy clients.

Maybe he's just trying to create an image of being an asshole but is really nice? Nah, I doubt that. Didn't he previously suggest that it should be the norm that clients send money to people who advertise before even meeting them as some sort of display of goodwill or seriousness, and if a client ends up getting ripped off because the guy doesn't show up it really isn't a big deal?

Is the question actually whether it's okay for you to change the relationship with this provider (masseur whom you pay who has sex with you after work) to a hook-up situation where he doesn't make money? Or are you saying that you would still pay the same fee but just have him skip the massage?

I assume by 3 bills you mean 3 x $100, not three bills of a smaller denomination. It's interesting that someone who charges escort rates chooses to advertise on rentmasseur rather than rentmen. There's no way I would schedule a session with someone who's advertising massage services but who charges $300/hour.

I don't understand his profile. He states he is not currently providing massage services, and then a few sentences later describes his massage services.

Roman Catholic. I wasn't surprised by that, though, given the Catholic men I had met who had been sexually abused by their priests as well as the numerous gay men in the seminary who were out cruising the bars.

As a general rule, service providers get reviewed, not their customers. Go to Yelp and read restaurant reviews that will include comments about the food and service; you won't find a similar grouping of reviews where servers submit reviews of diners, mentioning how much effort they required to serve or how well they tipped. It's just the nature of the game even though it might seem unfair to the service providers. I have no qualms about service providers sharing stories with one another. I know that when I used to hire off Craigslist 20 years ago that some guys would mention that a friend of theirs had vouched for me so they felt more comfortable meeting me. I think that talk among colleagues is entirely different than writing stuff about one's clients online, particularly if what you are writing is demeaning, and even then it makes sense for one to tread lightly unless you don't care about how clients will react if something you said gets back to them.

I exchanged messages with a guy on A4A a couple of years ago. We were going to meet but then I didn't like his conditions (I always meet someone in a public place, not just have them enter my place sight unseen, and this guy refused; for clarification I am talking about a hookup, not an escort). I had already reversed image searched his main photo and discovered he was a priest. He also had naked photos in his profile. I found it very odd that a priest would be so cavalier as to use the same photo on A4A that's on his church's website.

I'm a little perplexed. Do you mean someone saved your Adam4adam profile photos and is now threatening to send them to people you know unless you pay them? If you're just talking about some naked photos, I'd suggest that most people wouldn't be very shocked today to learn that someone they know had taken naked selfies to share with potential sex partners. Would your family and friends really be that shocked even if they did receive a naked photo of you from someone else? Surely anything else they wrote would rightfully be interpreted as someone trying to disparage you, with no reason to believe them, so I'd say this perceived threat is really only as bad as you make it. I'll share a story here: some nasty people thought they could "take down" a colleague they didn't like by printing out naked photos the guy had on a dating website and passing them around the workplace, trying to elicit outrage that a person in this guy's position would dare post naked photos online. The result was that a couple of people were put on unpaid leaves for a couple of weeks and the ringleader of this failed "take down" attempt was forced into an early retirement. The guy they were targeting suffered no consequences other than that some co-workers saw his naked photos who would never have seen them otherwise. In the end, I don't think anyone cared that this guy had naked photos online on an adults-only dating website. When one of the sleazeballs tried to show the photos to me, I told him that I didn't want to see them and that I was appalled at his behavior as a gay man not respecting the privacy of a gay colleague.

While I agree that each person needs to take responsibility for his own health and actions, I also think it's reprehensible for someone to knowingly lie about his HIV status (not just not disclosing it but actually lying about it) when the truth might cause his sex partners to take additional precautions. I certainly wouldn't continue to see someone who had lied to me in that way. I wouldn't attempt to make it into a legal issue though, at least not in a circumstance like this. I'm aware of some escorts local to me who lie about their statuses since they mention being negative on some platforms but then state they are positive and undetectable on others.

Rentmen reviews are largely worthless. The only ones I give any credence to are those left by clients who are obviously genuine (for example, some reviewers use the same name there that they use on this website).