maninsoma

Why does either of you have to be "wrong?" It just didn't work out.

I found a thread discussing him (in which he participated) on the lpsg website. Seems like he has a reputation for not being nice, especially when someone posts anything that challenges/questions him. The thread eventually evolved into him and those who are content to subscribe to his Only Fans page to mostly see solo content (from what I gather; I haven't subscribed). So I guess you "triggered" him by simply pointing out that he was advertising in multiple locations at the same time and asking where he really was, but it's very telling that he reacted so strongly to being called out for not really offering in person services but actually just attempting to drive OF traffic by calling you a derogatory name and then posting your phone number on Twitter. He disclosed that he has autism, but I think one can be on the spectrum and not be a complete asshole.

I understand your point of view, but I'm not sure you understood mine: I very well might be satisfied by an encounter where I don't cum. In fact, it happens not infrequently simply because I have delayed orgasms as a result of a medication I take. Unless I hire someone for an extended appointment, I'm almost assured I won't cum when I'm with him. But even when I could cum more quickly, sometimes I just enjoyed sucking men off. That was the enjoyment.

I agree about not putting anything in writing. I also wouldn't make the statement that you want to cum as part of the session about him. Simply present it as something you want and then if he attempts to redirect you again you can simply say that you won't be hiring him again because having an orgasm is an important part of a session for you.

Am I the only forum member who thinks this arrangement sounds pretty good?! $150 for a 2-hour good therapeutic massage? Sounds like a good rate to me since most guys where I live want more than that for one hour. The sensual elements involve him rimming you and letting you suck him off? As someone who loves sucking cock, I'd be very happy to have a masseur who has legit massage skills who's also hot let me blow him as part of the massage. Maybe I'd be a tiny bit disappointed about not cumming during the session, but I'd probably just get off as soon as I got home while looking at his photos and remembering the taste of his cum. I am not a "sub" in terms of wanting to be dominated, but I do enjoy making a guy cum as much as I enjoy having an orgasm myself. And I love, love, love looking up at a hot guy who has his dick in my mouth.

Had I been interested in this guy as a provider, I certainly would have searched for previous threads about him to see if they provided the information I wanted. I'm not interested in this guy beyond the amusement provided by his wildly overstated number of satisfied customers. I just thought I would share a giggle that none of the previous discussions about him mentioned. Not sure why I'm being reminded that the guy has been discussed here before and to use the search feature when I didn't ask any questions about him or seek out advice as to whether he's a good service provider.

Just noticed this ad on Rentmasseur where the guy says "join over 20K happy clients" and states he has been working for 5 years. Unless I'm mistaken, that means that, on average, he has seen over 10 clients every day for the past five years. I cannot imagine a masseur having that much stamina even if he did attract that much business.

I'd give him five $20 bills for a massage, and maybe six $50 bills for full service.

What I've read over the past couple of years is that COVID and drug overdoses (particularly fentanyl) were the principal causes of life expectancy decreasing in the US. I haven't read anything that ties life expectancy with the amount of immigration. Life Expectancy in the U.S. Dropped for the Second Year in a Row in 2021 WWW.CDC.GOV National Center for Health Statistics

This guy? https://rentmasseur.com/Homichjohn I know your status is "newbie," so just a (hopefully) helpful suggestion: If your thread title is more meaningful (i.e., it should have named the masseur) then you will get more people to read your thread. And then if you include a link in your post, it makes it easier for people to see the guy's ad you are asking about.

Typical con man point of view. I recently rewatched the documentary 101 Rentboys. I'm not sure why I watched it again; it really isn't very good, and the eye candy is minimal. They definitely focused on the marginally functioning guys. One guy's statement about his work was basically that he didn't have sex for money but rather that he would tell men what they wanted to hear, take their money, and then not deliver on what was discussed. His rationalization was that his victims "wanted" to give him money.

I'll just give my opinion: No, at least not in this form. I think that a truly high-end "agency" could exist for the wealthy that is more on the down low -- introducing exceptionally attractive people to men with money. This website just looks like any other escort website, though. They use the phrase "high end" and talk about matchmaking, but when I looked into their matchmaking service it seems to just be about entering search criteria on their site. I'll confess I didn't read the entire site. Are they actually providing more of a "concierge" service? I never really understood wanting to use an agency versus contacting a provider directly, though. Back when Premier was in business, I know they had a lot of success in a certain area of the country but I never understood what was in it for the escort or the client.

The description visible in the first post (not even clicking through to the site) mentions GFE (girlfriend experience). Is it surprising to anyone that their market is heterosexuality?

Looks hot to me. I am not particularly put off by the tagline in the first photo, but if everything he posted came with that level of puffery I'd be turned off.

That Twitter name didn't pull up anything for me anyway when I searched it.

There is, in fact, a reparations task force in San Francisco and I think they have issued a report calling for all black residents to get a $5 million payout. That doesn't mean that anything like that will happen, but that was their suggestion. I found the figure to be very strange, since the vast majority of working people wouldn't even earn that much in their entire lives nor would they inherit assets worth that much. African American Reparations Advisory Committee | San Francisco SF.GOV A committee that develops recommendations for repairing harm in our Black communities. I would not be surprised if the City isn't looking to convert former business space into housing. Near me they took over some parking lots and put trailers and tents there and, while they are supposed to be transitional spaces like other shelters, I just read an article that the City is trying to make some of these spaces permanent housing. I've also read about other buildings where the City has proposed converting office space into housing for the homeless. I'll make no other comments because I don't want to veer into politics.

It's difficult to assess whether your continued interest in addressing what you perceived is a threat is warranted or an overreaction since we don't know what happened. Your post reminds me of this unfortunate experience I had in Yelp reviews: My first name and location are associated with my Yelp profile. I don't post a ton of reviews, but I do frequently review restaurants, particularly when traveling. A few months after visiting Las Vegas and reviewing a few restaurants and bars there, I got a message from someone that contained a bunch of insults which made no sense since the person doesn't know me and some of their snipes were way off base. I should have just ignored their message but instead I replied to correct them, particularly their claim that I'm just some unhappy person that reviews every business negatively. Well, of course that person had to reply to my reply, and I don't remember exactly what they wrote but it was a vaguely worded physical threat. I chose to respond to that message by reporting them to Yelp, who in turn must have removed them from the platform since the messages disappeared and I could no longer see their profile. If you think this person went too far here in terms of threatening you, then report it to a moderator and let them decide whether they want to take action. Otherwise let it go.

Is this the same guy? For some reason the name Cambaz came to mind when I saw the photo in the current ad.

I find most of the men you included attractive, but there is a certain sameness to them -- white or maybe mixed race with lighter skin, buff, probably late 20s to 40 age range, mostly with some facial hair. I think a whole lot of people share your lust for men like that. If I were to post a collage, it would include men like that but definitely also men of other ethnic origins as well as some younger and some older men.

Same in San Francisco. I think most providers simply indicate they live in the central part of the city, so almost everyone is between .3 and .6 miles away from me. Ironically, I hired one guy who lives in my building and he's supposedly .7 miles away from me even though he's probably .02 miles away. I've also noticed that some guys are supposedly off the coast. I doubt there are many guys living in houseboats or on rafts in the Pacific Ocean.

And if you re-read my post, you will see that the part you quoted is from the paragraph where I was stating what my definition is. I clearly stated in the previous paragraph that there really isn't an agreed upon definition so it's pointless to make assumptions about what a provider's service will entail unless you communicate directly with him.

Here it is, nearly five years after this thread was started, and people are still getting excited thinking it's about the former Bel Ami model. Well, at least that was my initial reaction when I saw this thread this morning. I see that this masseur is actually going by the name Kris Evan, not Kris Evans. Maybe a moderator can change the thread title so that it matches the name in the ad?

If I was motivated to see someone and he reached out to me after viewing his ad, that wouldn't impact my decision to hire him in a negative way. It might make me book an appointment sooner, but it wouldn't turn me off. If the contact is sketchy, however, that would be a turn off. I remember years ago some guy basically begging me to hire him because he was about to be homeless, had some legal problems due to drugs, etc. Like that would motivate me to spend private time with someone! If it's a regular who just visits my area, of course I want them to contact me when they are planning a trip. If it's someone I hired once and they keep pestering me with texts, that's very annoying. If I haven't responded by hiring you again after your first or second marketing attempt, it isn't going to happen. One way to avoid someone messaging you after you simply viewed his ad is to browse while logged out of Rentmen.

If you still worked for the company where you once worked together, I would definitely side with those saying "don't hire him." Since neither you nor he works there, though, what's holding you back? I would definitely be upfront with him from the get-go so that he knows you know each other, and then the ball is in his court as to whether he thinks it would be too awkward to be hired by you. I just don't see why you having worked together years ago should make this uncomfortable for either of you, though. I have a few former co-workers that I would gladly hire if I found an ad for them and it wouldn't bother me in the least to morph from "hey, I used to talk with you at work" to "wow, this is really fun to be naked with you because I always thought you were hot."

I'm not suggesting I've never looked at free porn, but I think your first statement isn't accurate. I know how to find free porn, but I also know that porn is free either because (a) the content owner decided to share it for promotion or (b) it was downloaded by someone who then shared it, even though they don't have the legal right to do so. I think a lot of the free porn available falls into the latter category. If I'm a fan of someone and want to watch a lot of his videos, I'd rather pay him a nominal sum to watch all of his content instead of hoping to find all of the clips I want on free porn sites. Besides, the free clips usually have a lower resolution and I enjoy watching a clearer picture. I was even more serious when it came to music. While Napster and the like were encouraging people to download music without paying, I always wanted to buy music on a physical carrier because the quality was better and I wanted to support the people who made the music. Just different values, I guess.