DMonDude

You might have to message their web admin about it too. Could be something they removed but will restore for individuals that ask about it.

For whatever it's worth, i had messaged RMs web admin what happened to the crypto option, just out of curiosity. He replied back saying "please check again", and now it's back. So maybe it was just a User Interface glitch or something 🤷‍♂️

Same. Haven't tried this guy but he's on my to try list and coming up in the queue soon, but he seems like he checks these boxes on paper at least. https://rent.men/Elias_XL This guy i have tried and would recommend. He may possibly fit what you're looking for https://rent.men/uncutmoviebuff. I didn't ask for very dominant behavior/treatment from him, but i'd imagine he could do it if requested.

I wouldn't say i expect it, but i definitely want them to and i like the overall experience much more if they do. Just helps sell the illusion/experience more. If they don't, (or especially if they actively pretend to cum), then i find it's a harsher reality check of what we're doing for me. Kinda funny thing, but i remember learning here on this forum that a lot of providers who see multiple clients a day will save their orgasm for the last client of the day/night. I later found one provider and i specifically booked him last slot of the day with this in mind. But once i got to the session he told me he probably wasn't going to cum or even get hard during the session with me because he'd already came like 5 times that day lol. He apparently just cums based on who requests it (or maybe just on who ever makes him cum naturally) first come first serve. So i learned if it's something you know you want, definitely discuss it with the provider before hand, because they all handle it differently.

Very sadly, no. When i asked him about intos and asked about kissing and oral and other things, he said "not much of a kisser, but i can give oral". Wasn't entirely sure if he's sometimes down for kissing on a per client basis, or if he was just being polite. For guys who don't kiss I'm used to getting a much more direct "i don't kiss" during initial communications, so i dont know if that's a door that's fully closed or is a little ajar. I might ask about it next time i see him to be sure.

Yeah i'm the one they do those pairings for 😆. I love big height/size disparity. I'm 5'5" and i love 6'+ guys. I'm pretty typical in that i love bottoming for tall guys. I don't enjoy the challenge presented to some sex positions if i'm the one topping a tall guy. I know it can be done, i just don't enjoy it as much. I love how heavy large tall guys feel when they're on top of me and i love when their dick is proportional to the rest of them and i like the struggle of taking it. I like feeling like a giant got his hands on me and i'm at his mercy 😆 I also love verse flip flop fuck time with my fellow short kings though too. And every now and then when i as a 5'5" guy find a real cute but masculine 5'0" - 5'4" guy... 🫦

Saw Mreezzy last night. I had a great time. The pics are accurate, the equipment on display is fantastic and true to size, and he knows how to use it however you need him to for as long as you need him to. He's very friendly, patient, and easy to talk to. I will be seeing him again.

I reached out to him to set something up and he was responding weirdly. His profile says he's verse/top. I asked if he tops, does oral (he said yes), or kisses (he said no). He says he doesn't top but could bottom and asked how big i am. I gave him a heads up (trying to give him benefit of the doubt) that his profile listed verse/top and maybe he clicked that in error and that if everyone's hitting him up to top, when he prefers to bottom, that that was why. He says he's mostly a top. I tell him he just said a few messages up that he doesn't top so i was confused. He says he doesn't top "in this situation". I go "what situation?" He says "on here". I say it's not going to work out and drop the chat. Was a really needlessly long and convoluted way to figure out that despite advertising verse/top, he does not top for clients. Unfortunate, i wouldn't mind topping him, but i was so put off by the confusing messages i lost all interest.

Agree. Going off of this. I once hired a provider, and on the second time i hired him. He got a hotel for us. When the session was over, we both left together. He was going back to the house of a local friend he was staying with. He left me the hotel room key and offered to let me have it for if i wanted to have some other guys over for fun or just chill or whatever (i'd told him when i do this i can't host). I can only imagine he did this either because he trusted me enough to not mess up the room (can't imagine i garnered that much trust after only the second session), or someone else booked the room for him and anything i might do with the room wouldn't have fallen on his responsibility and he had no reason to care.

I was one of the (probably very few) people who paid with crypto back when i did have subscription. I wonder if not enough people using that method made them drop it.

Weed, back when i smoked/vaped it regularly, was always a sexual enhancer for me. I got hard easier, stayed hard longer, and came more intensely. That's, anecdotally, what i've heard is the experience from almost everyone i've ever known who also partook. Of course, exceptions exist though. Also with weed, for most people it calms and relaxes your anxiety, but for a small portion of people it sends you on an anxiety tail spin (i'm one of those people and it's why i stopped doing it). It's never universal. So it's entirely possible it had the inverse result for him. But it also could be because of a bunch of other reasons.

Maybe, maybe not. It would depend. I've only swallowed for two providers so far. One is a guy who for a while, neither of us could host and i didn't have the extra funds for hotels, so we just met up in our cars in various places and i'd give him head. Another is a dom top guy who goes multiple rounds, so i usually suck the first load out of him and then he gives me the others while topping. Giving oral to completion usually isn't what i hire for cause in my regular hookup life i'm usually the one giving. So when i hire i want to be the one receiving, but I'm not opposed to doing it. Try it again now, should work. I had my inbox disabled

For me, it's a "fantastic if they do, but they don't have to" thing. Of the two guys i hire regularly who do give oral, neither have swallowed for me any of the times i've hired them. Not sure if it's a hard rule for them or something i have to ask/increase their rate for, but i've never really bothered to ask. One will do it to completion but doesn't take it in the mouth at all, the other just gives a couple slurps to get me ready to top him. I wish they did but it's not something i need bad enough that i would stop hiring them just because of that. Have been considering trying a provider who i've been told is particularly good with "just lay back and get great head" sessions and he apparently always swallows. So if he blows my mind maybe I'll feel differently after that 😆

I have a regular provider who is also a bottom, and we find other top providers that top to play with together. We had fun with this guy https://rent.men/EnzoBrazilVllXX, he's in Hollywood. I can't speak to how he is when one on one though.

To be fair, as has already been mentioned in this thread, it's probably because all the services people use to get PrEP also pair it with DoxyPep now. That's 4 STIs protected/increased protection from. Most others are curable/treatable or are ones people are vaccinated against. And ones like herpes also are equally as transmittable whether having sex bare on PrEP/DoxyPep or with a condom. Most people who aren't on PrEP and have anal sex with a condom don't do so for oral, so they still run the risk of getting other STIs too. All things considered the level of overall risk is closely comparable. So when the risk level is close, for a lot of those guys the choice is the one that feels better. Not to say any of the guys are right to argue or pressure someone to take the condom off/not use it. They're wrong to do that to anyone. But I'm just saying you aren't getting their logic correct in your comment. They aren't being short sighted or making the decision they are thinking they are only protected against one STI. They've done math with details about the services that provide PrEP (like the fact that it also now normally comes with DoxyPep) that you didn't know and are acting accordingly.

A young provider i hire sometimes is the same way and i'm on the verge of sitting him down and teaching him finances too for the same reason. He easily could (sex)work himself out of the situation he's in if he managed his finances right, but he'll see a couple clients and then blow all the money he makes on a car payment that's 3x my own (near 4 digits) so he can look cool in Instagram photos, but then he'll tell me about how every unexpected expense like a car repair or fine nearly puts him underwater. So he's constantly stressed. I even understand how maintaining a certain look/lifestyle is crucial to social media content. If that's part of your job it's worth spending resources on, but there's a way to do that intelligently and a lot of these guys aren't doing that. They're making thousands and thousands of dollars a month (if not more) and spending it all that same month and barely scraping by, which is insane lol.

Yeah he probably just forgot it. If he was part of some kind of sting operation trying to entrap you, this is not how they would do it.

I've seen mentioned here before a good way to make sure the other person is clean (if you want to ask in a non-offensive or indirect way) is to suggest showering together as part of foreplay. I initially saw it here suggested from the provider perspective wanting clean clients, but i could see it working the other way around too. I haven't run into this myself, i've been lucky with very cleanly providers that i eat out (even the one actually straight/straight-ish one i hire sometimes knew to keep it super clean back there). But if it were an issue, before meeting them the next time i'd maybe ask via text while setting up the next session "could you make sure to shower shortly before our meet?" Maybe if i was feeling self conscious about them taking the request the wrong way i might add on "because i really liked the scent of your body wash on you" or something. Lot of people use scented body washes or scented soaps of some kind, so wouldn't be an unreasonable or unrealistic thing for someone to say they enjoyed.

No info on him, but the other guy in the pics with him (i'm guessing they're either together or just friends that probably work together with clients frequently) is reviewed here (and not particularly well). EvanLux/EvanLuxx (and other names). No mention of RafaelStretxch in those threads though.

Me personally, and like others up thread have mentioned, i will not be partaking in SpaceX any time soon (outside of the automatic exposure from indexes). SpaceX IPO is just so early inside investors can cash out because Elon's lost so much value for them after having them help him buy Twitter and xAI. Both of which are highly unprofitable money furnaces and are now worth a fraction of what he had investors help him buy them for. They both also have been bought by and rolled into SpaceX (Elon just passing money around his own accounts basically) and that's what the IPO is actually selling to retail investors under the guise of finally being able to get in on SpaceX. xAI in particular are actively throwing billions of dollars into a furnace https://finance.yahoo.com/sectors/technology/articles/xai-burned-6-4b-last-222608682.html with plans to spend more and no actual path to profitability in the foreseeable future (OpenAI who also are racing toward a rushed IPO via the same indexes bent rules has the same problem). SpaceX itself, in the past Elon had publicly said he wanted to keep SpaceX private specifically to not have to deal with the pressures and influences of running the company publicly like he does with Tesla. And he could afford to keep SpaceX private if he wanted to. He's only changed up on this now because he's doing this to bail out Twitter/xAI investors. I do think SpaceX itself has some potential as a long term business, but it's carrying the ball and chain of Twitter and xAI in the short term. And before you see any benefit of how SpaceX as a rocket company will perform, you have to carry the Twitter/xAI ball and chain first. I think retail investors will be left holding the bag when Twitter/xAI investors cash out. Then that potential crash in SpaceX stock price would be the actual preferred buy in point for people who think SpaceX will do well in the future. Everything about this IPO screams crypto style rug pull to me, personally. You can spot all the tells from that kind of thing in this from a mile away.

I'm around your age and i haven't had a problem with the college/just out of college aged guys. From what i can tell, a lot of them are actually very much used to guys older than us that are in their 40s, 50s, 60s and up. That's the sugar daddy age range, they have the real funds the younger providers get into this for. But I've found that a client who is big bro or uncle (or unc as the youth call us now) age is a nice change of pace for them personally. If anything will put them off, it's talking to them like this. No one finds this hot. As the Gen Zers say now from some meme, "buddy, you're scaring the hoes!" 🫢🫣

I also have had good times with no/low review guys. Some of them just happen to get the clients who don't subscribe to RM to be able to leave reviews but are working plenty often just as the highly reviewed guys are. The fact that the reviews on RM you do see are the top whatever % of the user base that cares enough to pay for the site to be able to leave a review and the other 80, 90, 95% of the users (whatever it may be) are hiring providers without ever leaving any reviews (like me), is something that should be remembered. Both for better (the pay wall means it's more likely reviewers are real reviewers) and worse (the paywall means there's very limited number of reviewers compared to the total user base which makes it inherently skewed). One of my regulars who i've been seeing for about a year, sees many clients, and still currently has no reviews on his profile. Having no profile reviews doesn't really mean the provider is new or bad, not by default. You definitely increase your odds of having a good experience by sticking to highly reviewed guys. SecretProvider is spot on in all he suggested. But i would say too, there is fun and hidden gems to find in the guys with no or very few reviews. Just still apply the vetting process SecretProvider listed before you meet them.

Haven't experienced that myself, but i've heard it's becoming more of a thing. Women going to Grindr and kind of using it like Feeld looking for bisexual men or for MMF threesomes and stuff like that or looking for gay men who might be bi-curious.

For 2 hours, other than doing it again... If we "finish" early, we just hang out and chat. Or we just call it and leave early and i just consider the "lost time" the fee for not having to worry about feeling rushed in a 1 hour slot, i'm not bothered by that if i'm the one choosing to head out early. Sitting in forced small talk too long is painfully awkward to me, and a scenario i'd pay to get out of. So it balances out lol.

No one else seemed to misunderstand. You not getting it doesn't mean it was weak. Some have agreed or disagreed, but if you didn't get it that's a you problem.