Dicastri

Agreed. It's instinctive to attack people with vile words like "stupid", but sexual urges can cloud proper judgement at times. Lets have some grace for the OP here- he's coming here for support and probably constructive advice.

He's let me rim that perfect ass but I haven't asked to fuck it. I prefer him topping me and I think that's his general preference too.

A provider really wanted to grind his dick on my couch/bed to finish. I just wanted to see him cum somehow, so that’s what he did to ejaculate. Apparently he has an idiosyncratic masturbation style

I found him too expensive for me. He seems responsive but I just couldn’t afford him at the time. That’s perhaps to be expected with his branding 😂.

Ah, I see now! He moved to NYC already? I was wondering why I wasn’t seeing him in the SF Rentmen homepage. Amazing for him but sad for me. A west coast treasure as wanderwest said above. He has one of the best asses on a top I’ve ever seen, in addition to a beautiful cock and an exceptional personality/intelligence.

Are you referring to me? If so, point out the text in this thread which suggests I am trying to make deposits seem like a universal requirement.

In the end, the sides of the market will react in equilibrium. You as a client don’t have to pay a deposit. That’s fine and respectable, and may influence the provider’s decision to make a possibly lengthy trip to you/ prep for you in the case they are bottoming. All is well ❤️ 🌈 💋.

Yes, please leave the conversation. It’s best for you. You dishonestly imply that the degree of difference in intensity between the outcomes in my analogy nullifies my main point: that both a person who declines a heart surgery because of hearing about the risk of complications and a person who declines to pay a deposit because they have heard about people stealing deposits may miss out on something that would have benefited them somehow. It is indeed best that you retire from this conversation.

Your BEST bet was to not post at all- as all you can now do is feign intellectual and argumentative superiority with sentences like this, even when it is clear you had no argument.

Lol yes it’s a difference in intensity of negative outcomes from not agreeing to something. That is obvious, and the degree of difference between death and not seeing a hot guy because you declined his deposit is as plain as day. I can tell you’re being disingenuous because you focused on the difference in intensity between the two scenarios I am analogizing, rather than the fact that in both scenarios, a service that entails risk is being declined. As the heart patient could have benefitted from the surgery, the client could have benefitted from that fun time with a provider he was interested in. The intensity of the outcomes is not at all the point.

Please point it out- otherwise this seems like a facade of having any argumentative standing when you actually do not.

Yes, we can imagine that your ideal world is one where no deposits are requested and no deposits are paid 🤣. A world where @KensingtonHomo would not have met with the sea of honest providers he alluded to meeting in his post, all so that he could avoid that 1% who didn't honor the deposit they were paid. We could similarly reduce the risk of heart surgery complications (an AI overview suggests 15% frequency) to 0% frequency by banning heart surgeries entirely.

I take your city situation to mean that you are saying this: “even if there are more faithfully honored deposits than stolen deposits, the practice of paying a deposit is unsafe”. The entire point of my first post on this thread is to say that NO ONE has information on the ratio of faithfully-honored-deposits to stolen deposits. The share of successful deposit transactions could be huge in comparison to scammed deposit transactions. It is similar to suggesting that many heart surgeries should be banned, because of the possibility that some percentage of those surgeries could go wrong or have complications. Driving cars should be banned, because you might get into an accident or encounter a drunk driver who kills you. The profession of Policing should end, because some police end up killing unarmed civilians.

You claim my comment is silly but you yourself actually make the silliest leap with your first paragraph here. The statement I said simply means that it is impossible to see the full distribution of outcomes that happens with deposit transactions. IE, obviously, no one has some database of what happens with all deposit transactions The times when a deposit is paid and faithfully honored are much less likely to be reported than the occasions when deposits are paid but stolen, leading to likely asymmetrical coverage of the latter.

Yup. I think deposits of something like $50 are ok, especially when it’s done for a guy with at least 40 5-star reviews and good commentary on CoM. There is way too much anti-deposit hysteria going on, and you never hear about all the times that a deposit DOESN’T get stolen, because of human’s natural attention bias towards negative outcomes (occasions when a deposit DOES get stolen). Its similar to how not every story of police good-doing (saving a life or rescuing someone) gets put out, but police-civilian deadly mishaps are much more likely to get coverage.