interesting new ad on RM

[robberbaron4u]

1 hour ago, mtaabq said:

I am fascinated by the exchange and conversations contained within this thread about this particular man. And I’m asking myself why I’m so intrigued. Perhaps I need a hobby … 

Perhaps? If your exchequer satisfies his need, he can be your full-time hobby. Go for it! 

[guru68]

1 hour ago, mtaabq said:

“Kissing” has been added to his “likes”. 

Timely.

[robberbaron4u]

1 hour ago, BaronArtz said:

I find his pictures very professional for someone who has been at it for 3 weeks only.

This is one of the things that got my attention:

"Competitive pricing as I build up this service."

How competitive is he?  Does anyone have fee information yet?

Rack rate is $145 hourly (companionship only); an additional surcharge of $245 applies for sexual intimacy; travel charge is $60 per hour within the Boston metropolitan area; three hours w/sexual intimacy and travel would be $685. He offers  "package deals" of $900 for 5 hrs w/sexual intimacy and an overnight deal (15 hrs, 7 hrs of play w/sexual intimacy + 8 hrs of sleep) priced at $1500; package deal pricing is exclusive of travel surcharge. 

Edited September 7 by robberbaron4u

[Constantine]

2 hours ago, BaronArtz said:

 How do you know he was set out on the curb?  And, quite possibly, why did that happen?

 

Speaking from personal experience, I dropped a regular after he visibly aged. With providers charging the rates they do, clients have a right to be selective and value youth. This is only amplified with sugar babies. 

[BaronArtz]

26 minutes ago, robberbaron4u said:

Rack rate is $145 hourly (companionship only); an additional surcharge of $245 applies for sexual intimacy; travel charge is $60 per hour within the Boston metropolitan area; three hours w sexual intimacy and travel would be $685. He offers a "package deals" of $900 for 5 hrs w/sexual intimacy and an overnight deal (15 hrs, 7 hrs of play + 8 hrs of sleep) priced at $1500; package deal pricing is exclusive of travel surcharge. 

Hmmmm.

So a one hour interactive fuck session is $390.  Not bad, but not exactly entry level competitive for a 40 year old without track record, entering the business.  I don't know about Boston, but in NYC that would not be entry level.  You said he was put out to the curb by is ex.  Does he have a place?  Can he host?

What I object to most is the $60 per HOUR travel charge within Boston.  He can't be serious.

The 3  hour package deal at $685 could be better, but I am not going to commit to that - sight unseen and untested.

He can forget about the 15 hour deal if it needs to include 8 hours of sleep.  I don't pay anyone to see them sleep.  

IF you are his confidant, I would advise him to re-think his pricing.

Edited September 7 by BaronArtz

[+ SirBillybob]

Maybe he throws in the Feb 2018 Vanity Fair for free. 😏

Edited September 7 by SirBillybob

[mtaabq]

2 hours ago, Alchemy said:

I think this qualifies as a hobby for most of us here. A sometimes expensive one. lol. 

I have to agree with you on that. 😀

[Luv2play]

1 hour ago, BaronArtz said:

Hmmmm.

So a one hour interactive fuck session is $390.  Not bad, but not exactly entry level competitive for a 40 year old without track record, entering the business.  I don't know about Boston, but in NYC that would not be entry level.  You said he was put out to the curb by is ex.  Does he have a place?  Can he host?

What I object to most is the $60 per HOUR travel charge within Boston.  He can't be serious.

The 3  hour package deal at $685 could be better, but I am not going to commit to that - sight unseen and untested.

He can forget about the 15 hour deal if it needs to include 8 hours of sleep.  I don't pay anyone to see them sleep.  

IF you are his confidant, I would advise him to re-think his pricing.

I find the 1500 fee for an overnight of 15 hours very competitive and what I generally pay. The 15 hours allows for plenty of play time, which I always break into at least 3 segments as in on meeting, after dinner and before bedtime and in the morning before breakfast. 6pm to 9 am. 
Sometimes we play in the middle of the night too for a half hour after I get up for my pee break. 
With this schedule we both get around 8 hours sleep, cumulatively. 

[Luv2play]

I should add my current regular and I do overnights exclusively and he is generous with his time. We start around 5pm and he leaves in the late morning around 11. All for 1500. About 18 hours in total. No rushing at all at any time. And we get 8 hours of sleep total. 

[+ KensingtonHomo]

If he is genuinely a 39-year-old, Ivy League-educated software engineer, I suspect his future lies in tech rather than finding another sugar daddy. Dumb of him not to get his paramour to marry him. At least then he'd get something in the divorce. 

Wealthy men in their 60s, 70s, or 80s wanting to forever be with a 20-something is grotesque. They don't want a partner but a pet or an employee. 🤢

[+ purplekow]

36 minutes ago, KensingtonHomo said:

If he is genuinely a 39-year-old, Ivy League-educated software engineer, I suspect his future lies in tech rather than finding another sugar daddy. Dumb of him not to get his paramour to marry him. At least then he'd get something in the divorce. 

Wealthy men in their 60s, 70s, or 80s wanting to forever be with a 20-something is grotesque. They don't want a partner but a pet or an employee. 🤢

Not grotesque in my opinion, rather unrealistic. There are exceptions, but for the most part a man in his 20s has needs most men in their 70s cannot fulfill.   Men in their 70's might initially be okay with that satisfaction coming from others, but eventually, they kick their paramour to the curb and hire a caretaker with benefits.  

[guru68]

12 minutes ago, purplekow said:

Not grotesque in my opinion, rather unrealistic. There are exceptions, but for the most part a man in his 20s has needs most men in their 70s cannot fulfill.   Men in their 70's might initially be okay with that satisfaction coming from others, but eventually, they kick their paramour to the curb and hire a caretaker with benefits.  

Yes, and the paramour might well not be interested in assuming the caretaker role, even after a long relationship.

[+ KensingtonHomo]

16 hours ago, purplekow said:

Not grotesque in my opinion, rather unrealistic. There are exceptions, but for the most part a man in his 20s has needs most men in their 70s cannot fulfill.   Men in their 70's might initially be okay with that satisfaction coming from others, but eventually, they kick their paramour to the curb and hire a caretaker with benefits.  

In my experience with men of this ilk (of all sexualities), the younger paramour is a hedge against their own aging. It’s a kind of arrested development. They don’t want someone to age with as a peer. 

I also consider it bad form to have a younger man with you for 10-15 years and then toss him out with no resources. I dated a wealthy man 12 years my senior when I was 21. He was gorgeous - like a refined Harry Connick Jr, great lover, generous, and quite chivalrous. But when he talked about his college boyfriend, he was horrified that his ex had aged. I saw a photo of them in college (when the ex was a dead ringer for me - slim, twinky ginger with wavy hair and green eyes) and a current photo which showed a man in his 30s who was handsome and fit with a receding hairline.
 

Though we saw each for a few more months, I knew in that moment  that my value to him had an expiration date. I had no interest in becoming dependent or even used to a life that would inevitably be taken from me. 

He’s in his 60s now and seems to have never married.🤷🏻

 

Edited September 8 by KensingtonHomo

[+ Gar1eth]

8 hours ago, Gar1eth said:

"I offer the full bf experience to those seeking it. We'll meet, talk, enjoy each other and play. Your confidentiality will be respected."

How does that not include kissing which I note is missing from his 'Likes.'

 

7 hours ago, mtaabq said:

“Kissing” has been added to his “likes”. 

 

7 hours ago, Peter Eater said:

His list of likes does include kissing. 

I don't think it was listed when I first saw the ad. On the other hand, I may have just missed it. 

[BaronArtz]

I will say he looks good for his age.  Somehow, I find his ass more convincing than his front side but that is just me being shallow.

A while ago, there was a most interesting article in the NY Times about what the dating options are for 40 year old women in NYC.  In other words, when you are 'over the hill' but not yet a wreck.  To some extent, it is applicable to 40 year old gay men - like this guy is.  The options are:

1. Date a 70 year old and be prepared to move to Boca.  Or Palm Springs.

2.Date the 27 year old, obviously broke and penniless guitar player who is still trying to find himself. Take yoga classes with him at Crunch.

3. Hire your hot Equinox personal trainer and pay him for sex.

Not entirely what most of us want to hear, but brutally honest regardless.

Edited September 7 by BaronArtz

[+ purplekow]

34 minutes ago, BaronArtz said:

I will say he looks good for his age.  Somehow, I find his ass more convincing than his front side but that is just me being shallow.

A while ago, there was a most interesting article in the NY Times about what the dating options are for 40 year old women in NYC.  In other words, when you are 'over the hill' but not yet a wreck.  To some extent, it is applicable to 40 year old gay men - like this guy is.  The options are:

1. Date a 70 year old and be prepared to move to Boca.  Or Palm Springs.

2.Date the 27 year old, obviously broke and penniless guitar player who is still trying to find himself. Take yoga classes with him at Crunch.

3. Hire your hot Equinox personal trainer and pay him for sex.

Not entirely what most of us want to hear, but brutally honest regardless.

While choices 2, 3 and 4 seem onerous, there are worse things than #1 if you leave Boca out of the deal.  

[robberbaron4u]

Be nice, gentleman. Keep in mind that he has never been "in trade" and he is working through the how and the why and the "whereto for" of the escort business; certainly, in his presentation, he is a prime property for acquisition by a gentleman of means who appreciates maturity in body as he would savor a bottle of fine, vintage wine.

 

[Peter Eater]

38 minutes ago, robberbaron4u said:

, he is a prime property for acquisition by a gentleman of means who appreciates maturity in body as he would savor a bottle of fine, vintage wine.

Even a bottle of fine, vintage win can leave you with a hangover.

[robberbaron4u]

25 minutes ago, Peter Eater said:

Even a bottle of fine, vintage win can leave you with a hangover.

Rx would be the "hair of the dog": bend over and spread those cheeks wide, sonny.

[Peter Eater]

11 minutes ago, robberbaron4u said:

Rx would be the "hair of the dog": bend over and spread those cheeks wide, sonny.

Ew.

[robberbaron4u]

1 hour ago, Peter Eater said:

Ew.

Yum.

[TJMS]

I wonder what he would say after I was done f'ing him "hey, I was in a monogamous relationship until just now!"

[Luv2play]

21 hours ago, KensingtonHomo said:

If he is genuinely a 39-year-old, Ivy League-educated software engineer, I suspect his future lies in tech rather than finding another sugar daddy. Dumb of him not to get his paramour to marry him. At least then he'd get something in the divorce. 

Wealthy men in their 60s, 70s, or 80s wanting to forever be with a 20-something is grotesque. They don't want a partner but a pet or an employee. 🤢

This has been going on since time immemorial. For both straights and gays. Nothing grotesque about it as it is part of the human behaviour ingrained in us. 

[robberbaron4u]

22 minutes ago, Luv2play said:

This has been going on since time immemorial. For both straights and gays. Nothing grotesque about it as it is part of the human behaviour ingrained in us. 

Agreed. Male, female, straight, gay or whatever...

[BaronArtz]

4 hours ago, robberbaron4u said:

Be nice, gentleman. Keep in mind that he has never been "in trade" and he is working through the how and the why and the "whereto for" of the escort business; 

 

You know I value your inputs, Robber!  But are you sure about that?  He has an extensive picture collection on this profile.  The pictures look very professional - certainly for someone who is 'new to this' since mid August 2025.  Who took all these pictures?  Was it his ex, who took the pictures for his own pleasure?  I am sceptical about him being 'fresh to the trade'.  

I understand it could be a marketing ploy, but in this case I am not quite buying it.  Not yet, at least.