SANTOS_FTM

[+ haring222]

Hey guys.  

I recently reached out to this FTM fellow; got back a great response to my text.  Seems like an awesome guy in general.  I have not had experience with a trans man before and have always wondered what it was like.  

Has anyone met up with him before?  That is not the best cover photo of him...he is HOT.

SANTOS_FTM - Male Escort, Gay massage - Chicago | Rent.Men

RENT.MEN

---

SANTOS_FTM Gay Escort in Chicago, Illinois, available for Gay Escorting,Modeling,Erotic Massage. | Find all...

 

[+ José Soplanucas]

I love his pictures. I have also been curious about FTMs and this one looks like a strong candidate to end in my bed if we ever cross paths. Please, keep us posted.

[pubic_assistance]

1 hour ago, haring222 said:

That is not the best cover photo of him...he is HOT.

That's quite an impressive transformation. 

Breast reduction is seamless, unless they photoshopped the scars out of the picture.

My advice would be to first understand whether or not this person had "bottom surgery". I find the resulting micro-penis to be unappealing to the point of revulsion.

I have no issues with a trans-man leaving their vagina intact. But I do very much NOT like the look of the mess that bottom surgery creates.

 

[+ José Soplanucas]

1 hour ago, pubic_assistance said:

My advice would be to first understand whether or not this person had "bottom surgery". I find the resulting micro-penis to be unappealing to the point of revulsion.

 

Well, I do not think anyone here cares about what YOU find repulsive. If the friend is curious about having sex with a FTM guy, this thread is about what he is interested in, and I am sure he knows he may have to deal with a "micropenis".

Could you try to be more supportive, or at least respectful and considerate for others' preferences?

[pubic_assistance]

3 hours ago, José Soplanucas said:

I do not think anyone here cares about what YOU find repulsive.

This forum is a group of people sharing opinions. 

If you dont care about MY opinion, you're free to BLOCK me. 

Meanwhile my opinion is as valid as any of yours.

So it stands as i expressed it. Micropenis/pussy = gross. They are an attractive trans person and I would happily fuck their pussy as long as it doesn't have a revolting micro penis attached to it. THAT would make me throw up.

 

[+ ApexNomad]

27 minutes ago, pubic_assistance said:

This forum is a group of people sharing opinions. 

If you dont care about MY opinion, you're free to BLOCK me. 

Meanwhile my opinion is as valid as any of yours.

So it stands as i expressed it. Micropenis/pussy = gross. They are an attractive trans person and I would happily fuck their pussy as long as it doesn't have a revolting micro penis attached to it. THAT would make me throw up.

 

You’re free to have preferences, but when you start labeling parts of someone’s body as gross or saying they’d make you throw up, it stops being a preference—it becomes dehumanizing. Bodies come in all shapes, sizes, and configurations. If someone’s anatomy makes you uncomfortable, move along—but don’t use your discomfort as an excuse to shame others. We’re all just trying to feel seen and safe in our skin. Try not to make that harder.

[+ José Soplanucas]

54 minutes ago, pubic_assistance said:

If you dont care about MY opinion, you're free to BLOCK me. 

 

You wish. I will continue calling out your lack of human empathy every time I find it offensive. 

It is like... my hobby, I think.

[NYXboy]

1 hour ago, pubic_assistance said:

This forum is a group of people sharing opinions. 

If you dont care about MY opinion, you're free to BLOCK me. 

Meanwhile my opinion is as valid as any of yours.

So it stands as i expressed it. Micropenis/pussy = gross. They are an attractive trans person and I would happily fuck their pussy as long as it doesn't have a revolting micro penis attached to it. THAT would make me throw up.

 

yukking other peoples yum is still bad manners. 

[ArchwayAlex]

I assume the you intend to vaginally penetrate they / them ?

[Walt]

5 minutes ago, ArchwayAlex said:

I assume the you intend to vaginally penetrate they / them ?

Why would you assume that about anyone's intentions? Should we assume that's what YOU intend to do?

[pubic_assistance]

11 hours ago, ApexNomad said:

don’t use your discomfort as an excuse to shame others. 

I wasnt speaking to the trans person.

So all this righteousness indignation is misplaced.

Edited June 14 by pubic_assistance
spelling

[Walt]

30 minutes ago, pubic_assistance said:

I wasnt speaking to the trans person.

I can't begin to understand why you might think it isn't as bad to say something behind someone's back as it is to say it to their face.  😞 

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

4 hours ago, ApexNomad said:

You’re free to have preferences, but when you start labeling parts of someone’s body as gross or saying they’d make you throw up, it stops being a preference—it becomes dehumanizing

At least we can agree then that tattoos can be called gross, as they are not parts of one's body.  Oh, and earlobe hair 😜 

Edited June 14 by Vegas_Millennial

[+ BOZO T CLOWN]

Bozo totally agrees about the resulting micro-penis from the surgical procedure. 

Also, Bozo can't understand the need that some members have to play forum hall monitor. @pubic_assistance has a legitimate opinion that falls within the rule guidelines. Isn't that the purpose of COM? No reason for the abuse.
Personally, Bozo wouldn't spend his $$ on a biological female, but respects those that would.

BTC
🤡
 

Edited June 14 by BOZO T CLOWN

[pubic_assistance]

Its remarkable, the number of little old ladies here who like to play Miss Manners...while knowing fully well, they wouldn't fuck that Trans pussy for love or money.

Back to the subject: I failed to notice the reported 4 inches under dick size. (Which is likely an exaggeration) The Journal of Sexual Medicine published an article in 2024 where the author noted the tendency of trans people grossly over exaggerate the size of their micropenis.

In MY OPINION  ..the surgical procedure to produce a tiny flaccid micropenis only serves to satisfy the trans person's emotional need for male identity. There is nothing remotely functional about the fleshy little peanut that gets stitched on to the clitoris. I have been with a few trans male people who did NOT do bottom surgery, and I found the experience sexually satisfying, in the way I was able to vaginally penetrate the individual, while visually being stimulated by their masculine appearance, rather than the typical female qualities associated with vaginal intercourse.  After bottom surgery you are left with the usual gay-sex anal penetration and a sad lump of flesh that can't get hard, nor ejaculate.

SEE: Visual estimation of penis size among, transgender and cisgender people and implications for genital gender-affirming surgery and sexual medicine, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, Volume 21, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages 175–180,

[+ José Soplanucas]

As I said, it not about manners. It is about human empathy. 

But of course, that is not something you can explain to people who do not have any.

 

[pubic_assistance]

1 hour ago, José Soplanucas said:

It is about human empathy. 

No. The thread is about hooking up with a trans person who is male-presenting. I have experience with this as well as preferences and I shared them in response to the question. If you disagree, with my opinion you are free to share your own, but your pontificating about finding everyone beautiful is beyond my wheelhouse and frankly ridiculous. You do you...but I am not playing along with that nonsense so you can keep it to yourself. 

 

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

5 hours ago, pubic_assistance said:

Its remarkable, the number of little old ladies here who like to play Miss Manners...while knowing fully well, they wouldn't fuck that Trans pussy for love or money.

Back to the subject: I failed to notice the reported 4 inches under dick size. (Which is likely an exaggeration) The Journal of Sexual Medicine published an article in 2024 where the author noted the tendency of trans people grossly over exaggerate the size of their micropenis.

In MY OPINION  ..the surgical procedure to produce a tiny flaccid micropenis only serves to satisfy the trans person's emotional need for male identity. There is nothing remotely functional about the fleshy little peanut that gets stitched on to the clitoris. I have been with a few trans male people who did NOT do bottom surgery, and I found the experience sexually satisfying, in the way I was able to vaginally penetrate the individual, while visually being stimulated by their masculine appearance, rather than the typical female qualities associated with vaginal intercourse.  After bottom surgery you are left with the usual gay-sex anal penetration and a sad lump of flesh that can't get hard, nor ejaculate.

SEE: Visual estimation of penis size among, transgender and cisgender people and implications for genital gender-affirming surgery and sexual medicine, The Journal of Sexual Medicine, Volume 21, Issue 2, February 2024, Pages 175–180,

Thank you so much for sharing.  As a Platinum Star Gay *️⃣🦄 who has never been near a vagina, I truly had no interest on ever getting close to one for the first time to learn about it.  Without your sharing on this forum, I would not have known about what's involved in the "conversation" surgery below the waist.  Thank you!   The thought of a hanging piece of flesh next to a 🤢🤮... Sorry, I couldn't even finish that thought.

Since a penis that ejaculates 🍆 💦 is very important to me when I hire, I will make sure that's what I look for in a guy when I hire him.

Edited June 14 by Vegas_Millennial
Added emojis to make this conversation a little more light hearted and gay! 😊

[AtticusBK]

@pubic_assistance you’re such a b!+(# … and I’m so here for it 😉

[+ José Soplanucas]

42 minutes ago, pubic_assistance said:

No. The thread is about hooking up with a trans person who is male-presenting. I have experience with this as well as preferences and I shared them in response to the question. If you disagree, with my opinion you are free to share your own, but your pontificating about finding everyone beautiful is beyond my wheelhouse and frankly ridiculous. You do you...but I am not playing along with that nonsense so you can keep it to yourself. 

 

Let me pontificate more clearly, because your intolerance blurs your judgment. I am not asking anyone to love and like everything. I do not like everyone. I do not like every body. But I do not find repulsion for the human body or for other human been. Not even for people like you. 

Feel free to show off your free thinking spirit. I am concerned about your mental health, but it is entertaining.

By the way, what ideas are you pontificating?

 

[pubic_assistance]

4 minutes ago, José Soplanucas said:

I do not find repulsion for the human body or for other human been.

(I will assume you meant "human beings") 

I am curious. Since you have such a superior opinion of yourself ....

How many trans-male-expressing people have YOU slept with ? 

 

[StableMentalDefective]

7 hours ago, BOZO T CLOWN said:

Bozo totally agrees about the resulting micro-penis from the surgical procedure. 

Also, Bozo can't understand the need that some members have to play forum hall monitor. @pubic_assistance has a legitimate opinion that falls within the rule guidelines. Isn't that the purpose of COM? No reason for the abuse.
Personally, Bozo wouldn't spend his $$ on a biological female, but respects those that would.

BTC
🤡
 

Stable agrees with Bozo and believes we do no one any favors by pretending that the results of a metoidioplasty are appealing. 

[+ José Soplanucas]

1 hour ago, pubic_assistance said:

(I will assume you meant "human beings") 

 

Yes sir. You know my English sucks.

 

1 hour ago, pubic_assistance said:

I am curious. Since you have such a superior opinion of yourself ....

 

I do not. The difference between you and me is that I am ashamed of my miseries and try to work on them while you celebrate and are proud of them.

1 hour ago, pubic_assistance said:

How many trans-male-expressing people have YOU slept with ? 

 

None. I have not been lucky enough to cross paths with one.

[pubic_assistance]

25 minutes ago, José Soplanucas said:

The difference between you and me is that I am ashamed of my miseries and try to work on them while you celebrate and are proud of them.

Well...no.

The difference between you and me is that I have no problem sharing an honest opinion and your "shame" leads you to believe that having one is wrong. 

I have no problem with people disagreeing with my opinion, but I have little tolerance for those who tell me I can't have one.

As far as the trans issue . .I feel you are speaking too much to defend something you have ZERO experience with. Go lick a swollen clitoris sewn into the shape of a tiny penis and get back to me with how much you had a wonderful time, and that every body is beautiful .  

[JayinHKNYC]

Go back to the beginning of the thread... if  "gross, revulsion, throwing up" is not against the COM standards, it should be. Nobody disagrees with your right to your perspective about certain transmen's choices. Some of the comments were about unnecessary vile language. What is next? Someone posts their opinion that every bodybuilder is revolting, or men with tattoos makes them puke, or a certain race disgusts them, or whatever.