Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
Posted

 

Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Gregory Carro said that because his backpack was not sufficiently in Mangione's control when Altoona police were detaining him, "the evidence found during the search of the backpack at the McDonald's must be suppressed, including the [loaded ammunition] magazine, cellphone, passport, wallet and computer chip."

Free Luigi! 

Posted

The key piece of evidence, the gun used to kill Brian Thompson, CAN be used as evidence.

Some evidence found in Luigi Mangione’s backpack at the time of his arrest will be excluded from his upcoming trial, a New York judge ruled Monday, though other key items – including a 3D-printed gun and writings expressing frustration with the healthcare industry – will be allowed.

Although some of Mangione’s belongings were tossed from the case, the mixed ruling is largely a victory for prosecutors, who will be able to show jurors the so-called “manifesto” and the firearm they say was used to kill UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/18/us/luigi-mangione-murder-trial-evidence

BTC
🤡

Posted

It was a terrible decision by a NY court to apply NY law (which has a narrower scope to the inevitable discovery exception) to a search conducted by Pennsylvania police within Pennsylvania.

On the bright side, the federal court decided to allow all of the evidence to be admitted in the federal trial. If convicted (federal prosecutors rarely lose a case), he will rot in federal prison for a very long time.

Posted

 The gun and notebook were the gold nuggets in that mine. The other stuff is far less-important to the case. So conviction looks likely despite the finding of partial, apparently - inadvertent procedural violations by the LEOs. That's probably one reason the judge threw them out, because if he didn't, it would come up in appeal later and easily wreck any guilty verdict. Appeals courts tend to be sticklers for procedural discipline, especially in capital murder cases.
And after Luigi is (hopefully) convicted on state charges, the federal trial is looming. He will never see the light of day again.

Luigi is reported to be fairly bright. He couldn't think of any other lawful way to make his point (whatever that may be)? What a waste. Spend life in prison for murdering a father, husband and son and reflect upon his very poor choices.

Too bad the death penalty was ruled out on the federal charges. If not, Bozo would've gladly volunteered to serve on the firing squad.

BTC
🤡

Posted
10 hours ago, BOZO T CLOWN said:

 The gun and notebook were the gold nuggets in that mine. The other stuff is far less-important to the case. So conviction looks likely despite the finding of partial, apparently - inadvertent procedural violations by the LEOs. That's probably one reason the judge threw them out, because if he didn't, it would come up in appeal later and easily wreck any guilty verdict. Appeals courts tend to be sticklers for procedural discipline, especially in capital murder cases.
And after Luigi is (hopefully) convicted on state charges, the federal trial is looming. He will never see the light of day again.

Luigi is reported to be fairly bright. He couldn't think of any other lawful way to make his point (whatever that may be)? What a waste. Spend life in prison for murdering a father, husband and son and reflect upon his very poor choices.

Too bad the death penalty was ruled out on the federal charges. If not, Bozo would've gladly volunteered to serve on the firing squad.

BTC
🤡

Don’t think bring an executioner is a job without its downsides. A report in the NYT yesterday found many suffer from mental distress following their role in executing someone. Similar in some ways to PTSD for police or soldiers who kill people in the line of duty. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Luv2play said:

Don’t think bring an executioner is a job without its downsides. A report in the NYT yesterday found many suffer from mental distress following their role in executing someone. Similar in some ways to PTSD for police or soldiers who kill people in the line of duty. 

Well, you need to have a moral compass to feel guilt. 

Posted
2 hours ago, José Soplanucas said:

Well, you need to have a moral compass to feel guilt. 

Wise words! 

Unfortunately, many on here (on both sides of the aisle) think a moral cause justifies violence. 

1 hour ago, BOZO T CLOWN said:

And we agree!
Sadly, the cold-blooded murderer Mangione nor his wild-eyed supporters have a moral compass.

BTC
🤡

 

When it comes to having moral compass or not... whoever is free of inciting to violence, supporting a bully or asks others to be violent... shall cast the first stone. 

 

Posted (edited)
On 5/19/2026 at 7:16 AM, BOZO T CLOWN said:

 The gun and notebook were the gold nuggets in that mine. The other stuff is far less-important to the case. So conviction looks likely despite the finding of partial, apparently - inadvertent procedural violations by the LEOs. That's probably one reason the judge threw them out, because if he didn't, it would come up in appeal later and easily wreck any guilty verdict. Appeals courts tend to be sticklers for procedural discipline, especially in capital murder cases.
And after Luigi is (hopefully) convicted on state charges, the federal trial is looming. He will never see the light of day again.

Luigi is reported to be fairly bright. He couldn't think of any other lawful way to make his point (whatever that may be)? What a waste. Spend life in prison for murdering a father, husband and son and reflect upon his very poor choices.

Too bad the death penalty was ruled out on the federal charges. If not, Bozo would've gladly volunteered to serve on the firing squad.

BTC
🤡

Is up to the Judge, the jury, and legal scholars to decide what's admissible as evidence or not. 

May I remind you he comes from a rich family and he's also white and handsome. I still think he'll be convicted and I think he's also a terrorist because he killed for a "political cause". 

I know... you and me usually don't agree much 😂 

Edited by marylander1940
Posted
1 hour ago, marylander1940 said:

Is up to the Jude, the jury, and legal scholars to decide what's admissible as evidence or not. 

 

Only judges decide what's admitted as evidence, which makes them the sole gatekeepers. Jurors decide how much to weigh the evidence that is allowed to be presented to them. Scholars may influence how judges interpret the law.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Lotus-eater said:

Only judges decide what's admitted as evidence, which makes them the sole gatekeepers. Jurors decide how much to weigh the evidence that is allowed to be presented to them. Scholars may influence how judges interpret the law.

and not us on here, right? That was my point, I hope you agree. Quote the 🤡 

tomato tomahto

Edited by marylander1940
  • Cooper changed the title to *United Healthcare CEO killed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...