Will "ass to mouth" becoming a mainstream practice lead to more STDs?

[marylander1940]

Urban Dictionary: ass to mouth

OP note: I'm not germophobic but that's something I wouldn't do.

Edited February 1, 2022 by marylander1940

[jeezifonly]

Generally it’s not any more risky than rimming yourself. Or rimming someone else whose anus is as clean as you keep yours.

When I prepare for an encounter of any sort, I’m certain that there is no unpleasant material that will be encountered, thus transferred to my mouth. I will also kiss a guy after being rimmed…  Not for everyone, but it’s funny how it causes the “squick factor” reaction. 

[+ Lucky]

Of course you kiss a guy who just rimmed you! It becomes a shared experience. And they are your own germs, after all.

[+ bigjoey]

On 1/27/2022 at 8:25 PM, jeezifonly said:

Generally it’s not any more risky than rimming yourself. Or rimming someone else whose anus is as clean as you keep yours.

When I prepare for an encounter of any sort, I’m certain that there is no unpleasant material that will be encountered, thus transferred to my mouth. I will also kiss a guy after being rimmed…  Not for everyone, but it’s funny how it causes the “squick factor” reaction. 

Rimming yourself.  Sorry, I was never that flexible😥

[+ IronMaus]

Gonorrhea and chlamydia spread just as easily between the mouth and the genitals - and possibly more so to/from your throat.

BJs and rimming without condoms or dental dams is just as unsafe as anal/vaginal sex without a condom, and using spit as lube is just as risky. You can even give your own junk STIs if you jerk off with your spit!

Just a friendly reminder: getting tested for STIs means blodd drawn, a throat swab, and a butt swab. If you aren't getting the swabs you aren't really tested.
 

[+ BenjaminNicholas]

12 minutes ago, IronMaus said:

Just a friendly reminder: getting tested for STIs means blodd drawn, a throat swab, and a butt swab. If you aren't getting the swabs you aren't really tested.

[+ StLouisOct]

I thought the title might refer to sucking a guy’s cock after he’s fucked you. I’ve seen that in porn movies, but it always struck me as pretty risky and maybe too flavorful. 

[Luv2play]

6 hours ago, StLouisOct said:

I thought the title might refer to sucking a guy’s cock after he’s fucked you. I’ve seen that in porn movies, but it always struck me as pretty risky and maybe too flavorful. 

Welln it's your ass he was fucking so how risky is that? In assuming you would know if you have parasites or other ailments down there.

[marylander1940]

7 hours ago, StLouisOct said:

I thought the title might refer to sucking a guy’s cock after he’s fucked you. I’ve seen that in porn movies, but it always struck me as pretty risky and maybe too flavorful. 

 It's becoming more common.... I always assumed after fucking an ass a cock should be washed, with condoms there wasn't such a need but in the era of PrEP things have changed. 

[marylander1940]

1 hour ago, Luv2play said:

Welln it's your ass he was fucking so how risky is that? In assuming you would know if you have parasites or other ailments down there.

Here's an interesting take on the subject.

How Dirty Is Going Ass to Mouth? (vice.com)

[xyz48B]

Again…

Maybe it’s just me…

But I’m not excited about putting anything that’s been inside my ass – whatever it is – in my mouth. I’d be likely likewise concerned if my coital partner wanted to too.

[+ StLouisOct]

On 1/31/2022 at 4:16 PM, Luv2play said:

Welln it's your ass he was fucking so how risky is that? In assuming you would know if you have parasites or other ailments down there.

What an odd and naive comment.

[Luv2play]

10 minutes ago, StLouisOct said:

What an odd and naive comment.

Did you actually read the article that Maryland posted above?

[xyz48B]

1 minute ago, Luv2play said:

Did you actually read the article that Maryland posted above?

 

That’s hardly an “article.”

And how does reading that help us understand why your comment isn’t odd or naive? Curious how your logic is working on this…

[Luv2play]

7 minutes ago, xyz48B said:

 

That’s hardly an “article.”

And how does reading that help us understand why your comment isn’t odd or naive? Curious how your logic is working on this…

What's your definition of an article? And what was your takeaway from reading it, if you did read it?

[Luv2play]

2 minutes ago, Luv2play said:

What's your definition of an article? And what was your takeaway from reading it, if you did read it?

And the definition you cited misspelled fellatio.

[xyz48B]

5 minutes ago, Luv2play said:

What's your definition of an article? And what was your takeaway from reading it, if you did read it?

That’s the “article” that was posted. A screenshot from it.

It’s an entry in a dictionary…a user-compiled dictionary online. The misspelling isn’t mine. What are you getting at with pointing out a misspelled word? Would you like me to make screenshots of the other entries so you can help us understand why your comment wasn’t odd?

I’m genuinely confused here what you’re driving at. 

[+ StLouisOct]

41 minutes ago, Luv2play said:

Did you actually read the article that Maryland posted above?

As Maryland noted, it’s an interesting take on the subject. If you want to lick your own feces, that’s fine with me. And I’m particularly impressed that you are apparently so attuned to your system that you know what’s in it. Pretty cool. No need for STD testing if you can tell what’s in your body.👍