SirBillybob

He got a fast car … city lights lay out before us.

My Movie 1.mov

I travel to London frequently and alone without family. So I do often like a bit of company at some point. I've always been successful at meeting young men who were not only handsome, but charming and fun, for a price that wasn't outrageous. So seems like a good location for a "sexcation".
I am surprised no one has mentioned Bangkok.  It's been several years, since I've been there but the low key attitude about homosexuality and sex work always provided an easy environment for me to bang my brains out.  I remember a place where you could book a suite upstairs where there was a spa downstairs with very handsome men who you could choose from. They would come to your room, take a bath with your, scrub your back, massage you, and let you fuck their brains out for a very low cost overall. The better looking/ muscular guys did expect high tips for better service but even then it was nothing compared to NYC.

There have been a few over its history. If you mean “I” the tall lean tatted long-haired chap doing stints in Florida and some modelling, yes he was dancing here in early February when I went by between winter trips abroad. 

Men of all body types and ages can be tops or bottoms, or verse or side….
There is a market for every type. Hung bottoms. Small dick tops. Muscly, husky, bear, otter, twink, twunk, masculine presenting, feminine presenting, etc. Any of those and more can be any role at any age. There are no rules.
Sometimes the novelty of a twink top is what a client wants and because there are fewer falling into the stereotypical boxes for that age or type, providers offering something less common may find themselves pretty in demand.
When providers find their preferences or skills changing, it makes sense to lean into those. It’s also smart to lean into what you perceive your market wants. Nobody is dictating who your market is, though. You can choose to appeal to the majority or seek out niche audiences. Both have their advantages.

I think the point is that those labels don’t matter. A person can identify as xyz and think they want one thing only…until they meet someone who makes them feel differently. It happens all the time with me. Tops arrive with an agenda, and by the time our appointment is over, they are telling me they want to get fucked for their next session. That happened today, in fact. By the way, it’s not from me pressuring them into anything or forcing a certain dynamic. It’s just how my clients respond to our natural chemistry. It can go the other way around for me too.
Maybe this never happens to you, and perhaps rarely for some others, but it happens. Those who are sufficiently open minded and in touch with themselves will recognize it when it happens and embrace the unexpected. It can be delightful when you’re open to what life brings.

A self-description as top or bottom or verse is just that - a self-description, which can be moot in the moment. 
 
The actual behaviors within a sexual encounter are going to vary, whether pro or amateur, depending on the combo of personalities and parts actually present.
It’s chemistry - precise in the lab, a crap-shoot on a date.  

An observation, sure, but it's also an escort's personal preference.  
I went through this myself.  At some point, I was no longer really interested in bottoming. 
I built my body up to what it is now and my clients no longer saw/see me as fuckable, but the guy who doles out the fuck.
Embrace the change.  Lean into the curve.

At least in the late 90s and early 2000s when I lived in NYC, it was pretty much the same there. I used to call it "Bottomland" (not a critique). Same thing with me, I used to call myself an "existential top". Not that I was complaining, but the vast majority of the guys I dated or hooked up with were bottoms, some quite strict about it. Even one or two of those guys who can't shut up about being tops, I ended up shutting their "not exactly their mouths".

In my experience, bottoms and tops come in all shapes and sizes. If you're talking about providers, I suspect what you're seeing is market dynamics. The former twinks who marketed themselves as bottoms, can probably command more clients and money as tops. Me and my husband tend to hire verse and tops, simply because I'm a bottom and my husband has no desire for two bottoms. 

I don't know about other men's particular desires/reasons to hire, but I don't think that there is some kind of contractual obligation for people to sign to be a top, bottom or versatile. People's predilections evolve, sexuality is fluid, they are in a business where they are to make money based on what sells, I mean, the reasons for them to "become" of one role to another are endless. Yes, feeling better about their bodies, or developing bodies for the purpose of selling themselves as tops is also a good reson for them to do it.
Kudos to all of them. The more they provide the more clients they can have.
I also know that to many gay men, theirs and the role of the person they are with is trated like religion and politics; they are very strict about it and want nothing to do (some have actually become hostile) with people who don't meet that particular criteria. There's no right/wrong answers. However, IMO, the more narrow and specific one is, the less the possibilities of finding people who cater whatever requirements. The role that they are willing to play when I hire is what matters to me, not what they have done in the past or will do with others. Just my opinion, not law.

If the word “handcuffs” or “sting” is employed in a review look at it contextually.

If the word “handcuffs” or “sting” is employed in a review look at it contextually.

I asked my butler to bring me my So Black Croc Birkin for a glam benefit … What a bitch.

If the word “handcuffs” or “sting” is employed in a review look at it contextually.

If the word “handcuffs” or “sting” is employed in a review look at it contextually.

If the word “handcuffs” or “sting” is employed in a review look at it contextually.

Tabernouche! You just ruined food porn for moi, everywhere in my ‘hood.
RPReplay_Final1708120768.mov

Tabernouche! You just ruined food porn for moi, everywhere in my ‘hood.
RPReplay_Final1708120768.mov

Pre-existing wrt steroid abuse or stand-alone psychopathology and blatant entitled egoism in tandem with Darwinian natural de-selection award pursuit while already on probation for domestic violence. Our outrage surely surpasses any testosterone-fuelled  anger that may be a factor. 

The trend is to avoid words from our own language to describe people that have a different linguistic background from us.  Since he is from Montreal, this phrase may be better suited for him than White Trash:
La poutine blanc

As an authorized First Nations & Inuit Health federally funded service provider I employed the term “Indian” adjectivally in my formal reports on multiple occasions as contextually institutionally endorsed by the community itself. It may spill over at times to common usage without disparaging intent. That said, one would not label a person in Canada Indian unless the nationality Indian.
As suggested by another post, language terms are subject to learning curvature that itself possesses a naturally evolving history, and questionable usage does not preclude course correction. However, a vexatious nag is hardly the ideal influencer. 

Some degree of indigenous peoples representation at Montreal Archeology and History Complex in Old Port, aka Pointe-à-Callière Museum. 
[Oops, I see you are already familiar]
Montreal Museum of Fine Arts for permanent art collections.
 

Pre-existing wrt steroid abuse or stand-alone psychopathology and blatant entitled egoism in tandem with Darwinian natural de-selection award pursuit while already on probation for domestic violence. Our outrage surely surpasses any testosterone-fuelled  anger that may be a factor. 

In my 20+ years on this platform and its predecessors I have never heard a report that police were posing as gay erotic masseurs. I don't see a need to worry about being caught by the police.

This thread is about the Natural History museum and there is a category difference between displaying indigenous artefacts in such a museum and displaying indigenous art in gallery. Displaying art is more likely to give indigenous people agency in a way that treating them as part of 'nature' does not.