maninsoma

Dawson was the bottom in one of Corbin Fisher's hottest scenes, CF 9-XXX Workout, where Duncan, Kenny, Connor, Tom, Cain, Zeb, Marc & Harper all fuck Dawson bareback and then cum in him -- and not fake cumshots either like some orgy scenes use. Even though I normally don't like orgy scenes, that one is really hot.

If you do the math, it takes a long time for the crossing point to occur (getting higher benefits by delaying collecting Social Security until 70 versus collecting it at a younger age). When I did the math, I figured out I would have to live past the average life expectancy for a male in the US at this point to start getting more money by having delayed collecting Social Security. I don't really need the extra money in this moment, but I figured I'd rather have the additional income now when I'm healthy enough to enjoy having it (I'm 63 and just started collecting this year). Who knows if I'm still alive at 78 how healthy I'll be and whether that extra money will matter to me. Everyone's situation is different, obviously, but I think the blanket notion that it makes sense to delay collecting Social Security until the benefit maxes out just doesn't make sense for a lot of people.

You don't need a computer to print at home. I can print to my wireless printer from my phone if I want to. I typically don't do this because I do own both a desktop and laptop computer, but the functionality to print from my phone is there if I want to use it. Of course this is easy because I have internet service at home and a wifi network. But even if you don't have that and just use your cell phone's network, there are still printers that will work via Bluetooth or something called WiFi direct, that basically allows another capable device like a phone to connect to the printer's WiFi network.

For pre-configured, name brand computers, Costco typically has very competitive prices -- sometimes slightly better specs than other places like Best Buy for the same money. The computer you linked looks more than capable for your needs. That's what brings me to this question: Do you need that much memory, that speed of processor, that much drive space, a touch screen? If not, I'm sure you could save money by buying something with lower specs. Just browsing the internet doesn't require much in terms of computing power.

While your post may come across as harsh to some people, I understand your point of view. Having sex outside of one's marriage and keeping it secret just seems like the opposite of love.

It's definitely a thing in Las Vegas, at least for female sex workers. I was surprised by the not so subtle comments and looks I got walking around the Strip area.

I get it. I had sex in: Lecture halls. In a dorm room while my roommate was out (got caught once -- that was an awkward scene, to say the least.) In a bathroom at work. Public parks. Parking garages. On the beach in Kauai. While driving. In parked cars (got caught by a cop once, but I think he assumed that since two men were in the car that we must have been telling the truth that we were looking for a map because we were lost). Trying to be quiet in an upstairs bedroom while parents were downstairs. Now, maybe I'm just lucky that video cameras were very expensive when I was younger and doing all of this, so the thought of recording it didn't even enter my mind. Also, there was nowhere online to post things. Then again, I'm hoping that I just would have had more sense than this guy. It's one thing to have sex in public and enjoy the thrill of it; it's another thing to record yourself doing it where both your face and the environment leave no doubt as to who's in the video, and then to share those videos online.

Is $500/hour really the average rate now? I'll confess I'm out of the loop because I seldom hire anymore. Using an online inflation calculator and using $150-$200/hour as the readily available rate in 2000, today's readily available rate should be about $270-$370/hour. It was also fairly easy to find hot guys on Craigslist or Adam4adam who charged less and, of course, there were the "porn stars" who had higher rates. Maybe the lower end of the range is harder to find now, and maybe the number of guys who think of themselves as "stars" has increased since people can create their own content for Only Fans. I would still hope that the average rate today isn't $500/hour since that not only far outpaces inflation but also, quite honestly, unless one is talking about the most amazingly attractive guy who can also provide a stellar experience that just doesn't seem to offer a value proposition.

We all like what we like. It's funny that while I like a guy ejaculating into my mouth I really don't want anyone spitting into it. I don't mind the exchange of saliva during french kissing, but actively spitting into my mouth would be a huge turn off to me.

When I was younger I didn't like the taste of cum so I avoided getting it in my mouth. Now I prefer to have a guy cum in my mouth, particularly if we are in a position where I can look up at his body and face as he orgasms. I know I've written about this here before, but one of my favorite escorts used to kneel over me and I would go to town on his ass with my tongue, and just when he was ready to cum he'd pull back and shoot in my mouth. Seeing his hot body and cute face as he exploded into my mouth was one of the reasons I hired him so many times.

Just from a medical/health perspective, I think your two options are simply to continue to not engage in oral activity or to require the use of a condom. It might be best to discuss your limitations in advance. You can do so without being presumptuous that the provider is even offering the possibility of oral sex by simply being clear that you are only looking for whatever it is you're comfortable with, which sounds like massage with a hand job. Since a lot of clients who hire an erotic masseur probably consider oral sex a nice extra, I'm sure the providers who have attempted to initiate this with you simply think that you would be pleased by this "extra."

I moved to San Francisco in the mid 1980s so started going to the Pride Parade and festival annually at that time. Because it was the height of the AIDS epidemic, a lot of the groups and floats that were in the parade were associated with that issue. There were also many cars carrying politicians, floats sponsored by local businesses that were connected to the community (bars, shows, etc). There was very little in the way of corporate presence. The same held true of the festival with the exception of the food booths and a few things like a local chiropractor hoping to drum up business and a luxury car raffle. The people who attended the festivities were largely people from the community. I don't know when the tide actually turned, but at some point the parade grew in length and began to resemble a long infomercial. Probably the worst memory I have is watching a very large Apple contingent, all wearing the same white t-shirt with a rainbow Apple logo but with nothing else specifically related to the community. On the one hand it was nice to see that Apple employees generally felt like the cause was worth participating in, but on the other hand as a spectator it was incredibly boring. And because there was so much of this, the parade simply became over-long, boring, and not community focused. The same thing happened to the festival. I also started to notice that a sizable number of festival goers weren't even community members or allies -- there were guys walking around holding a woman's hand, ogling other women and not men, and sometimes mocking effeminate men. I don't know if they came just to express their homophobia or if it was just another street party for them where they could get wasted in public. I really lost interest in the entire thing. These days I more likely to attend a Pride festival in another city (Oakland, San Jose) because their festivals still seem more community focused than San Francisco's. I write all of this to say that I don't care if San Francisco loses some of its corporate sponsors since, in my mind, that extra money and presence didn't really help the day's events.

The hide.me site still works for me, but only if I use a rentmen.eu link. It does not work properly with rent.men links. Also, hide.me has never worked for me using Firefox; I use Chrome.

Yes, if he doesn't want to show his face in his ad he simply shouldn't show his face -- not use someone else's face.

I hired a guy named Bruce Warren about 25 years ago. I didn't realize that he had done any porn until after I booked him. He only did a couple of scenes back in the early 2000s. I cannot find a good photo of him online, but here's the box cover of one of the films he was in. He's the guy topping in this photo. Though you cannot see his face, he was truly model handsome. As you can see, he had a very nice, lean, muscular physique. Definitely one of the most attractive men I ever hired. Not sure why I wasn't able to insert the photo into this post, but hopefully the link will work. If not and you want to see the photo I'm referencing, just do a search for Bruce Warren Gaslamp video and then click the link for the gayeroticevideoindex site. https://gayeroticvideoindex.com/images/Covers/9/video21299.jpg

Unless someone is a flight attendant or your nearest city is just a layover for them, I question why a traveling escort would only be available for a day or two. In fact, unless it's a well established escort (i.e., he's gotten good reviews here), I would question the legitimacy of the ad. Maybe it's someone who's just trying to drive Only Fans subscriptions or, worse yet, a con man looking to rack up deposits from suckers willing to send money to a complete stranger who has no verified history of legitimacy. At any rate, I'm sure the world is filled with beautiful men who could break your heart because you cannot meet them. Just enjoy the ones you can meet.

I enjoy drag entertainment, but I'm not turned on by men in feminine attire. I remember a porn studio that featured a lot of Latino twinks a couple of decades ago started having some of them in feminine undergarments and make-up. Completely ruined those scenes for me.

Even four decades ago, Liberace's lover was able to win a lot of money in a palimony suit. Unless someone signed a prenuptial agreement, I don't see how a three-decades long "trophy husband" wouldn't be able to collect palimony following a divorce.

I agree. While it's true that different jobs require control of different responses (e.g., you don't need to be able to get an erection if you are a customer service agent working in a call center), escorting isn't the only job where one has to manage one's thoughts and emotions in order to perform the job well.

I'll attempt to reword it in more straight-forward language, but maybe my interpretations are off the mark: "No, these encounters don’t occur in a geopolitical context of hyper medicalization and pharmacology." In sexual encounters like this, sometimes someone is going to have an erectile issue and it would be wrong to assume that every time this happens the answer is medication. "These dudes are not accessing and consuming PDE5i meds or combo IM prostaglandin / papaverine / phentolamine." These are types of ED meds; PDE5i meds include things like Viagra. Obviously some guys are going to be using ED meds, so I'm not sure why there's a suggestion that no one would be accessing or consuming these meds. "But they belong to a minority of men with autonomously accessible erectile reliability fundamentally irrespective of interactional context. You will also see here periodic claims of escorts posting on the board that they possess such membership." I'm not sure if this is supposed to be sarcastic, but the gist is that escorts should have no difficulty getting an erection regardless of the physical appearance of their client or any other situational factor.

Judge Judy's explanation applies here: If you eat the entire steak at the restaurant and then complain, you still need to pay for it. Clearly you liked it enough to eat it, so it isn't free. If you take one bite and discover it's terrible, it's reasonable to expect to not pay because what was provided was unacceptable. In this situation, I'd say that if the OP stayed for any significant length of time with the provider then of course he owes for the service. If he left immediately after showing up because what was being provided was not what was advertised, then it's reasonable to not pay (though if someone has traveled to me I will likely give them a small amount for their travel time/costs).

Hiring a masseur or escort isn't like dining out. The masseur or escort is getting your full fee, so it he provides a sub-par experience there's absolutely no reason to pay him extra. At a restaurant, it very well might not be the server's fault that you received a sub-par experience. Maybe you were simply disappointed with the food or ambience of the place. I wouldn't penalize a server because I didn't like things beyond their control; I just wouldn't return to that restaurant.

I'm confused. The first video you posted has him saying that he's exaggerating that accent; he has very little accent in the two other videos I watched. He's cute, nonetheless.

I don't really see it, either. Beyond that, he apparently was wearing an ankle monitor. That would be an automatic deal breaker for me once I saw that.

I think it's reasonable to be puzzled or irritated at the masseur's annoyance at your rejection of the additional service for additional cost. What I don't understand is why you think it's wrong for him to have attempted the upsell, unless you think that's always bad form (and some members here do complain about it). He doesn't know you so he has no reason to believe whether you would accept the offer. Just because you're sexy enough to be able to have sex for free within 15 minutes doesn't mean that he knew that. For all he knew, you were sex starved due to some psychological or other barriers. And, for all he knew, he turned you on physically despite your disinterest in him sexually.