maninsoma

I would give kudos to him if he had the integrity to be honest about his age...or at least close to honest. Claiming to be the same age for more than two decades is beyond ridiculous. I assume he looks good for a man in his 60s and that he satisfies clients or he wouldn't still be advertising, but I do wonder what happens when new clients meet him and find someone a generation older than his stated age.

I consider it a potentially promising sign that I've recently discovered some young "fitness influencers" on Instagram who have no tattoos. Seems like it's been years since I've seen a young jock who was ink free, so I'm taking this as a promising sign.

I actually prefer smooth, but if the comeback of hairy chests results in fewer men covering themselves with tattoos there then I'm all for it.

There's little point to this release. I wonder if they are hoping that people will impulse buy this without realizing that it isn't mixed like the original On The Radio. This really is not much different than previous hits compilations that combined her '70s and '80s hits.

This is the current text of his ad: "Hello, I’m masculine, clean, kind, educated and polite individual. 🌟 24/7 In/Outcall⭐️ I am Straight I was born to be a Master or obey I like to be worshiped and play with by both woman and boys I fuck woman but i still like to own and totally control submissive male slaves WhatsApp or text" Ignoring the parts that don't make sense, I'm struggling to find what's supposed to appeal to men in this ad unless you want to be "controlled" by a straight guy who won't fuck you.

There are so many handsome actors that I cannot imagine just picking 3 or 5. For whatever reason, provocative photos of Tom Holland keep showing up on my social media feeds. I don't mind. And I still have a thing for Ryan Reynolds, two decades after I first saw him. Same for Matt Bomer.

I have a photo (or multiple photos) of almost everyone I've hired over the decades, with the earliest ones being the exceptions since some of them were pre-internet. My memory is still pretty good so for the guys who were above average, I have no difficulty remembering sufficient details of my encounters with them. (Not dates or rates as much as what specifically I enjoyed about being with them.) I also keep track of all of my expenses so all of my hires are accounted for on those spreadsheets going back several years. (Before that I used to just use little notebooks to write down expenses as I incurred them.) I've also kept track on a monthly basis of how much I spent that month on escorts. When I hired more frequently, that helped me keep my hiring in line with my budget.

Assuming the OP is serious, I would suggest this: Spend your money instead on some therapy to help you figure out why you're not just getting sex with hot guys for free, given that you claim to be as hot as the guys you are hiring. Fortunately I never went overboard on my hiring, but I'm aware that some people do that. I think it's like any other luxury expense in life: it's fun to indulge on occasion, but it's important to set and maintain a budget you can afford. Going into debt to hire masseurs who give you extra attention just doesn't make sense to me.

There's someone in San Francisco whose stated age has been 39 for over two decades, also using at least some of the same photos. Yet when his name has been mentioned here as someone who drastically shaves decades off his age, a few defenders (friends or regular clients, I presume) jump in to say it doesn't matter and that he still looks great. It misses the point: A great looking man who's 65 isn't going to look the same as he did at 40, regardless of fitness level. I cannot imagine being a new client and showing up expecting a 39-year-old man only to find someone even older than I am (63). I'm not saying he should no longer be working as an escort or that he doesn't look good; I just think that if someone wants to continue to work for decades he should either be honest about his age in his advertising or just remove the age altogether.

I was not referring to the models in Jeffries' case specifically, just that sometimes a model/actor does have the ability to say "no" and leave (they aren't being forced or threatened and they haven't had their judgment impaired with some sort of substance) and if they choose to go along with sexual activity because they believe it will help their career that is quite a different thing than rape.

Quite a difference between saying "they had it coming" and "they had no choice." I don't think anyone "has it coming." It is possible to say no, though, unless you are truly being coerced or forced. I've watched some videos of some not very successful male models (they got some work but never broke through to work for a major fashion house) who spoke about photographers who tried to get hands-y with them and how they had to set firm boundaries despite knowing that it could potentially negatively impact their career.

I've seen similar tattoos on a lot of men and never associated them with sex work (either a provider or client). Is it just that specific design that's supposedly an indicator of sex work?

Rentmasseur removing negative reviews likely has nothing to do with what's going on in the USA regarding regulating online reviews. If that action had anything to do with the FTC's guidelines, then RM would be removing positive reviews as suspect, not negative reviews, if they seemed like they were either "bought" by the masseur (i.e., he gave a free massage in exchange for getting a positive review) or written by someone who had not even hired the masseur.

I don't think anyone would argue that rape has nothing to do with sex. It is a (typically) violent crime that involves sex. It's just that the forcing someone to do something they don't want to do, whether through physical force, threat of physical force or incapacitating the victim is primary, not the sexual activity. Otherwise it would just be a consensual sexual act. As to the greater likelihood of a younger woman being raped, there are more explanations for that than just them being more sexually desirable. And before that statement gets attacked as wrong, I'm not saying that all perpetrators don't care what their victims look like; I'm only saying that younger women are more likely to become a victim due to other factors as well.

Rape is more about power/control/dominance/force than sex. Men don't rape because they cannot get laid.

That's the first thing that stood out to me. It would be akin to just walking away from someone in a social setting without saying something along the lines of, "I have to go now; see you later."

I thinking "taking advantage" of an escort regarding rates is to agree to an appointment at a certain rate and then trying not to pay that amount at the time of the appointment. A client offering an amount that's less than what the escort wants isn't "taking advantage" -- the escort can just reply that that isn't sufficient compensation and move on (or block the prospective client if need be).

If you are looking to collaborate with him, he has an application link on his website (he has his own domain which you can find by searching for him).

I agree that he's very physically appealing. I'm also curious when someone writes their ad with a statement like "VIP only." Is that supposed to weed out everyone but the top 1% of money earners, or is it something else? I notice that he also didn't include "daddy" among his list of "I am into...," so perhaps he's also intending to screen out clients above a certain age (or maybe that just means he's not into "son/daddy" role play, though I think escorts typically use the "daddy" category to simply refer to age of clients they welcome.

Not all gay men are size queens. Some gay men look at "the whole package." But it's clear that some guys just care about cocks or the first glory hole wouldn't have been created.

I'm always puzzled when someone starts a thread about a porn performer in the Deli section when there's no indication he's available to hire. I agree with azdr0710 that this belongs in Cumming Attractions unless someone can confirm that the guy is a provider.

I've never been a landlord, but I have been a tenant in one of the cities viewed as most favorable to tenants. Yes, there are a lot of tenant protections in San Francisco and California generally. That doesn't mean everything always goes the tenant's way, though. From some landlords I've known, I know it isn't true to no one gets evicted, even single mothers. Is the eviction process easy or quick? No. But I don't think stating that certain people get to live rent free forever is honest. As to my much less onerous experience where things went the landlord's way and not mine, a building I had moved into sold within a year. Almost immediately, the landlord removed the laundry room and just stuck the washers and driers in a utility room that wasn't kept clean. He expanded the small studio apartment that had been above the laundry room into a two-level 1 bedroom apartment, doubling the rent in the process. However, he petitioned the rent board for a capital improvements passthrough that included all of the costs incurred in converting that space to something that generated additional revenue. Also, on paper the landlord was a single guy operating as an LLC and a lot of additional operating expense increases he also requested to to passthrough were to his live-in boyfriend who wasn't even providing some of the services they claimed (like cleaning the common areas twice per week and gardening). They got everything they asked for, which taught me the lesson that if a landlord makes up fake documents (such as his "contract" to pay his boyfriend), it won't matter what a tenant has to say. While this was going on I researched them online and discovered that some court in New York City had banned them from being landlords due to their long history of tenant abuses. Obviously they sold their buildings and just moved to a new location to start screwing over people here. After just a few short years, there were many negative comments about them online regarding their rental business here (mostly about stealing people's security deposits). Sure enough, when I moved out I didn't get my deposit back. Fortunately I was smart enough about the law so I simply waited the required time and then sent them a demand letter, advising them of my right to seek treble damages in small claims court and told them that I would do so if I didn't have the full refund in hand within 5 days. I got my check.

In this case, it was credited to him (as Puff Daddy) and Faith Evans featuring 112, I'll Be Missing You (the song that stole the Police's Every Breath You Take, ultimately giving Sting 100% of the songwriting royalties). Sorry for using the wrong name (P Diddy versus Puff Daddy) earlier; not being a fan, it's hard for me to know which name he used when.

I was in a restaurant last week and a P Diddy song was on their playlist. Maybe whoever selects their music didn't think about it or didn't care, but given the current allegations against him I was surprised to hear it.

If you are referring to location data based on last logon versus what someone writes in his ad in terms of where he is, then it could just be that he has logged into one site and not the other since traveling to a different location.