maninsoma

I don't think anyone would argue that rape has nothing to do with sex. It is a (typically) violent crime that involves sex. It's just that the forcing someone to do something they don't want to do, whether through physical force, threat of physical force or incapacitating the victim is primary, not the sexual activity. Otherwise it would just be a consensual sexual act. As to the greater likelihood of a younger woman being raped, there are more explanations for that than just them being more sexually desirable. And before that statement gets attacked as wrong, I'm not saying that all perpetrators don't care what their victims look like; I'm only saying that younger women are more likely to become a victim due to other factors as well.

Rape is more about power/control/dominance/force than sex. Men don't rape because they cannot get laid.

That's the first thing that stood out to me. It would be akin to just walking away from someone in a social setting without saying something along the lines of, "I have to go now; see you later."

I thinking "taking advantage" of an escort regarding rates is to agree to an appointment at a certain rate and then trying not to pay that amount at the time of the appointment. A client offering an amount that's less than what the escort wants isn't "taking advantage" -- the escort can just reply that that isn't sufficient compensation and move on (or block the prospective client if need be).

If you are looking to collaborate with him, he has an application link on his website (he has his own domain which you can find by searching for him).

I agree that he's very physically appealing. I'm also curious when someone writes their ad with a statement like "VIP only." Is that supposed to weed out everyone but the top 1% of money earners, or is it something else? I notice that he also didn't include "daddy" among his list of "I am into...," so perhaps he's also intending to screen out clients above a certain age (or maybe that just means he's not into "son/daddy" role play, though I think escorts typically use the "daddy" category to simply refer to age of clients they welcome.

Not all gay men are size queens. Some gay men look at "the whole package." But it's clear that some guys just care about cocks or the first glory hole wouldn't have been created.

I'm always puzzled when someone starts a thread about a porn performer in the Deli section when there's no indication he's available to hire. I agree with azdr0710 that this belongs in Cumming Attractions unless someone can confirm that the guy is a provider.

I've never been a landlord, but I have been a tenant in one of the cities viewed as most favorable to tenants. Yes, there are a lot of tenant protections in San Francisco and California generally. That doesn't mean everything always goes the tenant's way, though. From some landlords I've known, I know it isn't true to no one gets evicted, even single mothers. Is the eviction process easy or quick? No. But I don't think stating that certain people get to live rent free forever is honest. As to my much less onerous experience where things went the landlord's way and not mine, a building I had moved into sold within a year. Almost immediately, the landlord removed the laundry room and just stuck the washers and driers in a utility room that wasn't kept clean. He expanded the small studio apartment that had been above the laundry room into a two-level 1 bedroom apartment, doubling the rent in the process. However, he petitioned the rent board for a capital improvements passthrough that included all of the costs incurred in converting that space to something that generated additional revenue. Also, on paper the landlord was a single guy operating as an LLC and a lot of additional operating expense increases he also requested to to passthrough were to his live-in boyfriend who wasn't even providing some of the services they claimed (like cleaning the common areas twice per week and gardening). They got everything they asked for, which taught me the lesson that if a landlord makes up fake documents (such as his "contract" to pay his boyfriend), it won't matter what a tenant has to say. While this was going on I researched them online and discovered that some court in New York City had banned them from being landlords due to their long history of tenant abuses. Obviously they sold their buildings and just moved to a new location to start screwing over people here. After just a few short years, there were many negative comments about them online regarding their rental business here (mostly about stealing people's security deposits). Sure enough, when I moved out I didn't get my deposit back. Fortunately I was smart enough about the law so I simply waited the required time and then sent them a demand letter, advising them of my right to seek treble damages in small claims court and told them that I would do so if I didn't have the full refund in hand within 5 days. I got my check.

In this case, it was credited to him (as Puff Daddy) and Faith Evans featuring 112, I'll Be Missing You (the song that stole the Police's Every Breath You Take, ultimately giving Sting 100% of the songwriting royalties). Sorry for using the wrong name (P Diddy versus Puff Daddy) earlier; not being a fan, it's hard for me to know which name he used when.

I was in a restaurant last week and a P Diddy song was on their playlist. Maybe whoever selects their music didn't think about it or didn't care, but given the current allegations against him I was surprised to hear it.

If you are referring to location data based on last logon versus what someone writes in his ad in terms of where he is, then it could just be that he has logged into one site and not the other since traveling to a different location.

Betty Davis was married to jazz legend Miles Davis, herself being a musician who recorded some edgy funk/rock albums. Bette Davis, the subject of this thread, was the internationally known film star. When I saw this thread, I was confused that anyone in 2024 would be discussing Betty Davis' passport since she isn't well known outside of certain music lover circles.

I seldom use Google's Image Search because it's been so long since it was useful. I remember when it was new, it was really bad. A photo of a man with an erection would get matched with any items that contained hard, tubular parts like brooms or mops. Then it seemed really good for a while. I don't know if it's just that sites are now programmed to limit Google's abilities to match the photos they host or if there's something else going on, but I almost never find a match any more. I just noticed that if you are using Chrome, it now indicates that you can search using Google Lens, so maybe that's the new product. Interestingly Lens did work when searching an image from a news article on msn.com; it found not only the same image but also similar images (same group of people, but different photos). It did not work when searching an image from Rent.men; I got no search results.

Makes an appointment with you and then blocks you before the appointment is scheduled? If that's what happened, then what I would make of it is that the guy is confused unless you've left out other details. Why would a business person schedule a meeting in order to make money and then do something to communicate to the client that they don't want their business? It makes no sense. If your appointment required sending a deposit and then you got blocked after sending money, what I make of it is that the guy is a con artist and you've got taken.

To each his own. If I find a scene going on too long, it's easy to skip ahead. I like the camera work in his videos because it puts me in the room, so to speak, showing me what I would see if I were there walking around and observing the action from different vantage points. It's a lot better than footage from two or three stationary cameras edited together. I also don't care about the setting (never cared about that in porn unless the setting added natural beauty, like being filmed on a beach). I will admit, though, that all porn gets repetitive. The only thing that keeps it fresh is "new meat," so to speak. I understand getting bored with someone and wanting to move on.

RentMasseur 2.0 is online now. Not sure if it was offline 14 hours ago or if it just didn't load for some people because there is not a pop-up that you have to click in order to proceed to the site. Depending on one's browser configuration, I imagine that could cause the site to just not load properly.

I don't think they've ever had a detailed search function -- just the filtering options you mentioned.

That's not the way it's working for me (Windows OS, Firefox browser). The list just keeps expanding as I scroll down the page until I reach the end.

What don't you like about it? From what I can tell (just spent about 10 minutes poking around), it's an improvement over the previous version.

I don't think I've ever used the phrase "the boys" to refer to my group of friends. I probably used "the guys" instead. I'm not offended by others using the term.

Maybe my use of Zelle is different. I've only ever requested or sent money via Zelle when logged into my account on either my computer or my phone. Apart from confirming my login credentials, I don't remember seeing any type of code. When I send money, if the other person is looking at their phone at the same time then they accept the funds immediately and I get a text that the transaction is complete. I'm pretty sure there's no way to claw back the money after that; I even see a warning before sending money that I should only send money to known parties because there is no way to reverse the transaction once it's complete.

That's horrible. Note: I am not suggesting sending any type of threatening communication to his work email, but if you can figure out what it is given you know where he works then I think you'd be within reason to simply send an email to that address that indicates his Zelle payment did not go through and you still expect to be paid "for the work you performed for him." That might make him concerned enough that he'll turn honest, at least for his transaction with you. Again, I don't think you should write anything in your email that could be interpreted as a threat to expose him; hopefully he'll just worry about that on his own and then send you the money.

I actually found Austin's self-directed/filmed porn boring precisely because of his "technique," which seemed to be just to put some stationary cameras around the room with little consideration given to resolution, lighting and what each camera was actually going to capture. Maybe if I was a bigger fan, I would have enjoyed watching multiple videos with different angles of the same sexual encounter, but with most of his videos that I saw it just seemed like it was difficult to see much other than two bodies going through the motions of sex without much detail. Contrast that with better self-directed/edited porn like Rhyheim Shabazz's which is basically produced more like studio porn, with a person actually moving a camera around the action so we can see different angles, close ups, farther away shots, etc, all done with proper cameras and lighting so you can actually see what's going on. I know Rhyheim sets the bar high on production quality, but there are a lot of other guys filming their own porn with lower production qualities who still manage to put out stuff that looks better than Austin's.

I once saw a porn where the bottom said repeatedly, "Sweet Mother Mary!" (No kidding.) Are you talking about something similar? "Fuck me, Jesus!"