Wozgau Posted October 28, 2024 Posted October 28, 2024 It looks like his 4myfans site is down. Is all his content gone now?
ncc1701d Posted October 28, 2024 Posted October 28, 2024 WOnder how he's doing in MDC....he's a big guy (and didn't know he was 43 until that one WeHo article) and pretty amazing body for 43 (even if his personality is a lot less well developed)....i still remember him outing a potential client a while back by posting their phone number.... pubic_assistance and marylander1940 2
Guest Posted October 29, 2024 Posted October 29, 2024 (edited) In my personal local opinion, Austin Wolf was someone you didn't personally associate with (obviously beyond a working relationship), and if you did, it said something about you. His presence was THAT weird. As a regular person, I wouldn't feel comfortable partying with him in any capacity. Edited October 29, 2024 by BodeBrentwood
MeatHead Posted October 29, 2024 Posted October 29, 2024 16 hours ago, ncc1701d said: WOnder how he's doing in mdc Likely taking plenty of dick. + Vegas_Millennial, Luv2play, MikeBiDude and 1 other 2 1 1
Rudynate Posted October 29, 2024 Posted October 29, 2024 He used to post here right? Real sexy but very prickly personality?
Beancounter Posted October 29, 2024 Posted October 29, 2024 https://str8upgayporn.com/austin-wolf-arrest-plea-deal-gay-porn/ Here’s a story on the latest update on AW I could find.
BuffaloKyle Posted October 29, 2024 Posted October 29, 2024 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Beancounter said: https://str8upgayporn.com/austin-wolf-arrest-plea-deal-gay-porn/ Here’s a story on the latest update on AW I could find. I don't agree or at least understand one part of that article. It says there has been no grand jury indictment. That 100% can't be true. You can't be brought into court and be read charges and enter a plea without a grand jury indictment. Federal cases take a very long time. The continuances are due to the case not being ready to go to trial based on either still gathering evidence, still negotiating a plea, etc. Edited October 29, 2024 by BuffaloKyle
TonyDown Posted October 29, 2024 Posted October 29, 2024 An indictment is the outcome of the grand jury, but whatever.
SirBillybob Posted October 29, 2024 Posted October 29, 2024 (edited) My uninformed armchair take: Arrested/charged based on an information or complaint submitted by the prosecutor, in which probable cause is satisfied based on the FBI’s submitted investigative affidavit-type material. Likely held based on societal safety and flight risk. What is postponed to date is a preliminary hearing where the judge determines probable cause OR a grand jury indictment satisfies that step in order to proceed to trial. I don’t think an indictment is always necessitated. Plea bargaining suggests that some degree of culpability is acknowledged with a view to circumventing a trial and jumping to sentencing based on the criminal guilt agreed upon and other mitigating factors such as informant role cooperation. Edited October 29, 2024 by SirBillybob Luv2play 1
dutchal Posted October 30, 2024 Posted October 30, 2024 13 hours ago, BuffaloKyle said: I don't agree or at least understand one part of that article. It says there has been no grand jury indictment. That 100% can't be true. You can't be brought into court and be read charges and enter a plea without a grand jury indictment. Federal cases take a very long time. The continuances are due to the case not being ready to go to trial based on either still gathering evidence, still negotiating a plea, etc. A Federal criminal case can begin one of two ways – with the filing of a criminal complaint or of an indictment. A criminal complaint is a document prepared by the US Attorney’s office in conjunction with the law enforcement agency that investigated the case (FBI, IRS, Secret Service, etc.). It is presented to a Federal Magistrate Judge who determines if there is probable cause to know that a Federal crime was committed and that the person charged committed it. A person can’t be convicted solely based upon a criminal complaint. It is just a placeholder, allowing the government to begin a criminal case. Once it is filed and the defendant becomes aware of it, the government has 30 days to present the case to a Grand Jury for an indictment to enable the case to move forward. See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rules 3-9. https://www.new-york-lawyers.org/understanding-the-federal-court-process-from-complaint-indictmen.html + WestGuy and + robear 2
SirBillybob Posted October 30, 2024 Posted October 30, 2024 (edited) The same ADA prosecutor was assigned in April to the case of the fellow charged at that time and ostensibly the person that informed on Smith, assigned a public defender. If she is still prosecuting both cases I assume they are tied together. Just my speculation but if her trial prosecution of Smith were to be strengthened by the sworn testimony of that fellow in which he corroborates the FBI affidavit I would think it all hinges on the ongoing status of that case. Isn’t one implication for that fellow that he potentially self-incriminates by testifying on the stand? Therefore, his plea position is relevant, no? And both defendants seeking downward sentencing variance. I would think that a grand jury indictment step would depend on evidence based on that fellow’s formal sworn testimony before the grand jurors, if indeed the grand jury step allows for witnesses beyond the prosecutorial arguments put forward to that jury. I assume that the grand jury process requires that the prosecution lay out all evidence and all sources of testimony that would occur in trial. If a primary witness is incarcerated his capacity to make it to trial testimony and survive, as a detention abuse target, the duration elapsed is also a factor. He endures the dual labels of pedophile and snitch. With that fellow’s case possibly resting on testimony of those charged and having informed on him early in 2024, systemic gridlock comes to mind as a variable that in part explains delays and continued postponement. A development within any part of the web will inevitably resonate with other web areas. Edited October 30, 2024 by SirBillybob
dutchal Posted October 30, 2024 Posted October 30, 2024 53 minutes ago, SirBillybob said: The same ADA prosecutor A quibble: Since it's a federal case, the prosecutor is an AUSA rather than an ADA. pubic_assistance 1
SirBillybob Posted October 30, 2024 Posted October 30, 2024 5 minutes ago, dutchal said: A quibble: Since it's a federal case, the prosecutor is an AUSA rather than an ADA. I stand corrected. I’m not American. I erroneously word-saladed Assistant with SDistrictNY. thome55 1
dutchal Posted October 30, 2024 Posted October 30, 2024 41 minutes ago, SirBillybob said: I stand corrected. I’m not American. I erroneously word-saladed Assistant with SDistrictNY. This is probably more info than you want, but: At the federal level , the prosecutors are the U.S. Attorneys. There is one in each federal court district (each state has somewhere between one and four, depending on population size). His/her Assistant U.S. Attorneys are known as AUSAs. At the state level, the prosecutors are either chosen on a county basis or on a district basis. In most states, they are called either District Attorneys or State's Attorneys, although some are called by other titles (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_attorney). In states where they are called DA's, like New York, the assistants are ADA's. If they are State's Attorneys, such as in Illinois, then they are ASA's, etc. pubic_assistance 1
SirBillybob Posted October 30, 2024 Posted October 30, 2024 26 minutes ago, dutchal said: This is probably more info than you want, but: At the federal level , the prosecutors are the U.S. Attorneys. There is one in each federal court district (each state has somewhere between one and four, depending on population size). His/her Assistant U.S. Attorneys are known as AUSAs. At the state level, the prosecutors are either chosen on a county basis or on a district basis. In most states, they are called either District Attorneys or State's Attorneys, although some are called by other titles (see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_attorney). In states where they are called DA's, like New York, the assistants are ADA's. If they are State's Attorneys, such as in Illinois, then they are ASA's, etc. Yes.
MikeThomas Posted October 30, 2024 Posted October 30, 2024 Perhaps this topic belongs in The Lounge peter831 and + azdr0710 2
CAMoon Posted November 27, 2024 Posted November 27, 2024 I have read the transcript of his June detention hearing and let me tell you, its MUCH worse. cany10011, marylander1940, thomas and 3 others 1 3 1 1
CuriousByNature Posted November 28, 2024 Posted November 28, 2024 5 hours ago, CAMoon said: I have read the transcript of his June detention hearing and let me tell you, its MUCH worse. Horrific thomas, BSR, caliguy and 1 other 4
caliguy Posted November 28, 2024 Posted November 28, 2024 7 hours ago, CAMoon said: I have read the transcript of his June detention hearing and let me tell you, its MUCH worse. Jesus. I thought it only went so far as downloading child porn which is bad enough. It looks like he was actively making the porn himself. pubic_assistance, thomas, BSR and 1 other 1 3
BuffaloKyle Posted November 28, 2024 Posted November 28, 2024 Not surprised he was having sex with minors and seeking out additional minors. He was a big time porn star and I'm sure he was getting hit up through his socials by them. Very easy for him to have access. Luv2play and caliguy 1 1
pubic_assistance Posted November 28, 2024 Posted November 28, 2024 1 hour ago, caliguy said: Jesus. I thought it only went so far as downloading child porn which is bad enough. It looks like he was actively making the porn himself. Oh no ! Very disappointing. marylander1940 1
maninsoma Posted November 28, 2024 Posted November 28, 2024 9 hours ago, caliguy said: Jesus. I thought it only went so far as downloading child porn which is bad enough. It looks like he was actively making the porn himself. Yes, the government's allegations are quite disturbing, including prepubescent victims. Maybe the defense attorney is competent (I'm not a lawyer), but I didn't find his arguments compelling (nor did the judge, obviously). caliguy 1
marylander1940 Posted November 28, 2024 Posted November 28, 2024 Business 1.1 "When you're great making money legally, you don't do something illegal to jeopardize the entire business" Austin Wolf's X account has officially been deactivated WWW.PRIDE.COM The famous adult entertainer is currently being held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
Luv2play Posted November 29, 2024 Posted November 29, 2024 8 hours ago, marylander1940 said: Business 1.1 "When you're great making money legally, you don't do something illegal to jeopardize the entire business" Austin Wolf's X account has officially been deactivated WWW.PRIDE.COM The famous adult entertainer is currently being held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. Old news. Dated August. marylander1940 1
marylander1940 Posted November 29, 2024 Posted November 29, 2024 (edited) 3 hours ago, Luv2play said: Old news. Dated August. It's been talked about it already here and I am aware of that I guess you missed the motto of what I posted. Edited November 29, 2024 by marylander1940
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now