Why so many providers from Brazil, Venezuela, and Colombia?

[Boaxxx]

22 hours ago, keroscenefire said:

 

Very interesting data. Thanks for providing it. I was curious so I ran it again and now Denver has 21/89 Latin guys. So a little higher now at 23%. Another data point would be to look at guys who speak Spanish. That's actually a bit higher than "Latin" in Denver at 24/89 or 27%. A few "Latin" guys drop off and a couple more guys come up. Latin is somewhat nebulous term. One guy who comes up as a Spanish speaker but not Latin is KevinCol who puts his ethnicity as black but also says he is Colombian. Probably would be described as afro-Latino to me and probably most people. Just might be missing a few "Latin" guys based excluslively on the Latin tag on RM.

Also generally interesting that the two highest Latin population cities have the lowest number of Latin escorts. Maybe people are more interested in what isn't common?

Thanks for this data though. I find it quite interesting. 

Who would have thought that statistical analysis would evolve from RM. Life has surprises around every massage table. 😉

[+ Vegas_Millennial]

14 hours ago, arnemgreeves said:

If it were just poverty, then we should logically see lots of African or Southern Asian escorts, or even those from war-torn Middle Eastern countries. 

When I was in Europe (the continent) I noticed men for hire were mostly from war-torn Eastern countries.  This supports my theory that it is not only the desire to leave poverty, but also having the means to be able to do so.  South Americans travel to where it's cheapest for them to get to.  Same with men from the Eastern hemisphere.  We don't see too many escorts from the interior of Africa; not because there is no poverty, but the men are so poor they have no means to leave.