SirBillybob

Addendum:
In sum, not buying it. I’d put a sock in it.
The dynamics of differential between flaccid and erect length and girth, principly smooth muscle tissue relaxation, are not even a footnote.
The potential for increased qualitative [sic] efficacy of penile injections, given they were evidently employed for clinical setting measurement, is not mentioned.  Artificial tumescence does not translate to real world.

Some of us reside in metriculated regions. Otherwise, unmitigated growth will yield a newly emerging STD, foot-in-mouth disease.

Some of us reside in metriculated regions. Otherwise, unmitigated growth will yield a newly emerging STD, foot-in-mouth disease.

Some of us reside in metriculated regions. Otherwise, unmitigated growth will yield a newly emerging STD, foot-in-mouth disease.

Overall average flaccid length decreased proportionally considerably more than erection length increased when comparing past 3 decades. Therefore, counterintuitive large changes in the differential between flaccid and erect call into question the accuracy of measurement, notwithstanding that the cohorts for flaccid and erect measurement do not overlap entirely. 
Statistical measurement artefacts such as regression to the mean may explain this anomaly better than the hypotheses put forward. In the same way that flaccid length measurement may have naturalistically self-adjusting outlier values showing reduced difference between true and observed amounts over time, the more recent erect length values could similarly adjust downward going forward from current higher means, subsequently trending towards the earlier lower mean values, nullifying the observation of increase over the last decade compared to previous ones.
It also appears that erection length was predominantly measured by intracavernosal injection and, if not, the variation that would be expected by spontaneously solicited erections in a clinical as opposed to naturalistic arousal context could have been a factor. 

“I’ll just say I like the PUMP! Jock on.”
Despicably manipulative much? Evil vortex much? Who does that?!

That's what I was wondering.  If they're just asking, then the Stanford study is as reliable as a Grindr profile.  If they're measuring, how da heck do you get that job??

Grindr should have a feature to adjust for "confounders". 😝 Everyone claims to be 8 inches.

The growth will eventually stop.  A penis can't be more than 11 inches... Because then it becomes a foot!

I hope so, especially since the Fjord Probe was discontinued. 

In fact, I am surprised that the topic has not devolved to that of thread count investment considerations given prospective sperm counts deposited on bed sheets relative to the variable of booking deposits. 

Two ad photos; stolen from two different social media profiles. The Israeli is about 24, does not do porn. The ad is fake. English, Dutch, Russian. I wouldn’t be rushin’ into a booking even if I could go dutch with a few other suckers.

Yes, we are born to learn to be able to recognize the familiar and predictable. The unfamiliar evokes involuntary mental reaction and that is adaptive in many cases. Our central affective states are happy, sad, angry, anxious, surprise, revulsion. Note that the majority of affective adaptation exists in the more negative realm.
I think I was more startled when first aware of intact foreskin. As well, surprised and curious when as a young child comparing my genitalia to that of my sister plunked into the same bathwater. Then surprised about her later menstruation onset.
In your case perhaps it is harder to bury the lead: a kind of disoriented revulsion. First impressions tend to be strongly anchored. I will happily snack on dark dried raisins but I will never be persuaded to eat a slice of raisin pie, and I pick out and discard raisins from muffins and butter tarts. I guess I reacted poorly to the novel texture or I was nauseous for some unrelated reason. I have no problem with prunes or any other dried fruit in baking. 
We possess in common a seemingly irreversible and idiosyncratic revulsion not particularly amenable to alteration via more advanced cognitive processes. I’ll take mine, though, thank ye very much.

Physical and moral revulsion are emotional cousins but associated with different cognitive states and autonomic nervous system processing. If you are primed to categorize the phenomenon of idiosyncratic physical disgust in relation to an entity as evidence of sociopathy, based on your background experience with an individual in which your perception is already negatively oriented, then your moral indignation related to this one isolated example is no less a logical fallacy than his assuming that his subjective and protracted physical response, also anchored in context, categorically defines the entity as disgusting. (I did not detect such an assertion on his part.) This bias alone nullifies the argument that the isolated phenomenon exemplifies a social background priming the privilege of othering. 
The legitimacy of moral (eg, character, personality) judgement is no less arguable than the physically induced affective state of revulsion. We see that either may spontaneously manifest and reside on a continuum of alterability.

In fact, I am surprised that the topic has not devolved to that of thread count investment considerations given prospective sperm counts deposited on bed sheets relative to the variable of booking deposits. 

To be pedantic AF, I wasn't quoting him I was reporting what was said, so I was writing the word as I would always write it. If I had wanted to make a point about how Ford recorded what he had said I could have written 'color' and followed it with (sic) to indicate the non-standard (to me) spelling. But now I'm being silly, and that would be my defence in court! Now, back to deposits.

I had always understood that he said the word. If indeed he spelt the word, I am grateful for that additional snippet of information!

I remember it being claimed, probably apocryphally, that Henry Ford said of the Model T that you could have any colour you want, as long as it's black. His factory, his choice. That's why to this day all Ford cars are black.

by the way, welcome to the forum @Jay_lucas  
it's not always this way!.......sometimes we talk about air fryers, thread count on bed sheets, and mutual funds........
I hope you'll stick around....... 

Physical and moral revulsion are emotional cousins but associated with different cognitive states and autonomic nervous system processing. If you are primed to categorize the phenomenon of idiosyncratic physical disgust in relation to an entity as evidence of sociopathy, based on your background experience with an individual in which your perception is already negatively oriented, then your moral indignation related to this one isolated example is no less a logical fallacy than his assuming that his subjective and protracted physical response, also anchored in context, categorically defines the entity as disgusting. (I did not detect such an assertion on his part.) This bias alone nullifies the argument that the isolated phenomenon exemplifies a social background priming the privilege of othering. 
The legitimacy of moral (eg, character, personality) judgement is no less arguable than the physically induced affective state of revulsion. We see that either may spontaneously manifest and reside on a continuum of alterability.

Maybe coloured fingernails will grow on some of us.
My sense is that an earring was at first incongruous with stereotypical masculinity and the rogue pirate analogy was invoked to neutralize any tone of femininity. Then which side ear to further stratify identification, that then seemingly neutralized. Yet earrings on a boardroom suit might not fly, or work well in certain job interviews. Values shaping place and time inevitably come into play.
Tattoos on females may be considered less highly stylized and less overly faddish a look compared to when the trend began. 
Nose rings evoke bovine imagery for me. He’d have to be face down, however hot, for me to not feel going down the bestiality hole. Automatic pass on such an ad. Admittedly, rigid terms of personal taste.
Rolling with tattoos in intimacy, not much choice. Eventually arousal paired with ink seems to neutralize misgivings. However, less is more and I don’t get the addition to infinity trend. It seems a desperate bid to stand apart but then ubiquitous enough to necessitate an additional level of distinction to a ridiculous level. 
And those stretched lobes? I mean where do you want me to insert it?🤢
As for painted shiny fingertips, when I said I like a polished look …

Two ad photos; stolen from two different social media profiles. The Israeli is about 24, does not do porn. The ad is fake. English, Dutch, Russian. I wouldn’t be rushin’ into a booking even if I could go dutch with a few other suckers.

Most likely true. I grew up in an all white American small city where everyone was circumcised. So that's what looks "normal" to me. It's a reasonable argument that had circumcision not been the standard, I wouldn't be repulsed by it. But the fact remains that I didn't see an uncut dick for many years. So my mind says "yuck" when I see one. Nothing I can do to change that.