Cretus

You can ignore the above.
Best advice - NEVER SEND ANY $$ UPFRONT. NEVER! Nothing good can happen.
BTC
🤡

Seems risky. Hopefully contact information isn’t concentrated (ie, some mass group chat).
A mass group chat of known sex workers seems very risky if somehow leaked to the wrong person, or if some raid is coordinated, or if some disgruntled member with nothing else to lose decides they want to take the New York market down with themselves.

Seems risky. Hopefully contact information isn’t concentrated (ie, some mass group chat).
A mass group chat of known sex workers seems very risky if somehow leaked to the wrong person, or if some raid is coordinated, or if some disgruntled member with nothing else to lose decides they want to take the New York market down with themselves.

It is a shame that this stigma exists. I frequently interact with Black tops who have really nice asses, and for some, whenever I ask about them bottoming, they reply that they can, but it’s stigmatized.
I wish people didn’t have such a restricted conception of Black male sexuality.

It is a shame that this stigma exists. I frequently interact with Black tops who have really nice asses, and for some, whenever I ask about them bottoming, they reply that they can, but it’s stigmatized.
I wish people didn’t have such a restricted conception of Black male sexuality.

It is a shame that this stigma exists. I frequently interact with Black tops who have really nice asses, and for some, whenever I ask about them bottoming, they reply that they can, but it’s stigmatized.
I wish people didn’t have such a restricted conception of Black male sexuality.

In my experience:
Sometimes, RM chat has a weird thing that clears out everything you’ve been previously typing.
More importantly, lengthy convos are things that some time-wasters jack off to. 
 
Providers want to have signs that a paid meeting will occur, and that you are not taking advantage of their time for free. I see warnings in bios now too: providers are tired of being  contacted by of scammers, free-jerkers, and time wasters on the site . 
 
Once you meet with them, they could indeed become more verbose. 

Providers travel. Someone who is in NYC today could be in LA tomorrow. 

I personally favor the current "411 on (name) in (city)"  system we have now. It is accessible (with some searching of course). Also, post wording as well as account novelty helps make it obvious who is a secret provider trying to  manipulate their public record or not. 

Excellent idea.
I support adding post tags to the existing 411 reviews on the site. 

I personally favor the current "411 on (name) in (city)"  system we have now. It is accessible (with some searching of course). Also, post wording as well as account novelty helps make it obvious who is a secret provider trying to  manipulate their public record or not. 

Agree.  I only wish there were a way to filter reviews by city...

I personally favor the current "411 on (name) in (city)"  system we have now. It is accessible (with some searching of course). Also, post wording as well as account novelty helps make it obvious who is a secret provider trying to  manipulate their public record or not. 

long, long history behind the "DaddysReviews".......
I'm no expert, but for those new or curious:     the near-daily posting of reviews submitted by forum members who had met with providers goes way back to early "Hooboy" days (about 1999-2000).....Hooboy was the founder of the discussion forum (and review page) which is now called COM.......he evidently constantly traveled the world, often losing his laptop, and was obsessed with getting the daily reviews posted on time....... Hooboy suddenly died about 2006 (?) and, after estate squabbles and dispute between his then-assistants, "Daddy" emerged as the sole operator of the old Hooboy forum and reviews.......Daddy also was very dedicated to getting the daily reviews, now under the domain name daddysreviews dot com, out on time and greatly allowed the providers to have the last word in the event of a dispute.......all thru the late 2000s and 2010s, the near-daily reviews (usually about five or so each day) were a much-anticipated read for many forum members, if only for entertainment value and occasional  juicy negative reviews with related occasional response from a provider......both well-known providers and new ones were included.....Daddy was pretty strict with vetting the entire process and occasionally bemoaned the time it took.....fake reviewers and crooked providers were publicly shamed by Daddy when appropriate.......some reviewers loved to practice their flowery romance-novel writing skills and others were to-the-point and very professional.......it was easy to submit reviews of a provider-client meeting and it was all very fun and entertaining.....
Daddy died in 2021 and there was much angst among forum members about how the forum, always very friendly and "community", and reviews would continue....Daddy held very tight control over the entire operation and nobody knew his passwords, etc......the daily reviews, of course, ceased and the forum was eventually rescued by hard-working @RadioRob, who came out of nowhere suddenly one day and announced, "I have this"......after much exchanging of email addresses and phone numbers by members who feared the worst, a collective "whew!!" was heard across the forum......
but the daily reviews are a labor-intensive endeavor........hours of work and I assume that's why they haven't been resurrected.......plus liability, disputes, what-have-you are not inviting concerns to face......setting up a new and clean review-submission process would be a colossal chore even if daily updating was eliminated.......a new review site has been discussed by forum operators, but I certainly understand its delay........   

In my experience:
Sometimes, RM chat has a weird thing that clears out everything you’ve been previously typing.
More importantly, lengthy convos are things that some time-wasters jack off to. 
 
Providers want to have signs that a paid meeting will occur, and that you are not taking advantage of their time for free. I see warnings in bios now too: providers are tired of being  contacted by of scammers, free-jerkers, and time wasters on the site . 
 
Once you meet with them, they could indeed become more verbose. 

In my experience:
Sometimes, RM chat has a weird thing that clears out everything you’ve been previously typing.
More importantly, lengthy convos are things that some time-wasters jack off to. 
 
Providers want to have signs that a paid meeting will occur, and that you are not taking advantage of their time for free. I see warnings in bios now too: providers are tired of being  contacted by of scammers, free-jerkers, and time wasters on the site . 
 
Once you meet with them, they could indeed become more verbose. 

The concept of a client asking a provider to recruit another provider inherently seems weird to me.
 
It seems in the above case, the client definitely wasn’t paying nor interested in a second provider simultaneously , and he made that clear, so the client isn’t in the wrong.
I don’t understand clients who do expect providers to recruit a third guy for free.
 
And even when paying for that second provider, it seems like it would be a risky thing unless that client contacted the second provider himself.
 
I personally don’t trust too many providers, and it seems the first provider described in that review was out for himself. Reckless behavior.
As a client, I always reach out to all parties personally whenever I want group fun in NYC. 
I would advise all providers to never accept any proposition from another provider, without speaking with the client himself. Period.

The concept of a client asking a provider to recruit another provider inherently seems weird to me.
 
It seems in the above case, the client definitely wasn’t paying nor interested in a second provider simultaneously , and he made that clear, so the client isn’t in the wrong.
I don’t understand clients who do expect providers to recruit a third guy for free.
 
And even when paying for that second provider, it seems like it would be a risky thing unless that client contacted the second provider himself.
 
I personally don’t trust too many providers, and it seems the first provider described in that review was out for himself. Reckless behavior.
As a client, I always reach out to all parties personally whenever I want group fun in NYC. 
I would advise all providers to never accept any proposition from another provider, without speaking with the client himself. Period.

My quick search described him as A MAGA influencer that got caught up in a human trafficking scheme. Not sure that’s relevant to our discussion. 

LMAOOO I was already suspicious of the three posts before this latest one by “Docter”. Like, come on man, we get it 😂 😂 😂

One can feel free to try to negotiate, but I disagree that it is common for someone to accept a lower price- being in NYC. 
 
Maybe you are in LA and it is different there (I have been to LA a couple times, and the good quality providers don’t go below $300-350)
 
 

In my experience:
Sometimes, RM chat has a weird thing that clears out everything you’ve been previously typing.
More importantly, lengthy convos are things that some time-wasters jack off to. 
 
Providers want to have signs that a paid meeting will occur, and that you are not taking advantage of their time for free. I see warnings in bios now too: providers are tired of being  contacted by of scammers, free-jerkers, and time wasters on the site . 
 
Once you meet with them, they could indeed become more verbose. 

In my experience:
Sometimes, RM chat has a weird thing that clears out everything you’ve been previously typing.
More importantly, lengthy convos are things that some time-wasters jack off to. 
 
Providers want to have signs that a paid meeting will occur, and that you are not taking advantage of their time for free. I see warnings in bios now too: providers are tired of being  contacted by of scammers, free-jerkers, and time wasters on the site . 
 
Once you meet with them, they could indeed become more verbose. 

In my experience:
Sometimes, RM chat has a weird thing that clears out everything you’ve been previously typing.
More importantly, lengthy convos are things that some time-wasters jack off to. 
 
Providers want to have signs that a paid meeting will occur, and that you are not taking advantage of their time for free. I see warnings in bios now too: providers are tired of being  contacted by of scammers, free-jerkers, and time wasters on the site . 
 
Once you meet with them, they could indeed become more verbose. 

In my experience:
Sometimes, RM chat has a weird thing that clears out everything you’ve been previously typing.
More importantly, lengthy convos are things that some time-wasters jack off to. 
 
Providers want to have signs that a paid meeting will occur, and that you are not taking advantage of their time for free. I see warnings in bios now too: providers are tired of being  contacted by of scammers, free-jerkers, and time wasters on the site . 
 
Once you meet with them, they could indeed become more verbose.