Cretus

Seems risky. Hopefully contact information isn’t concentrated (ie, some mass group chat). A mass group chat of known sex workers seems very risky if somehow leaked to the wrong person, or if some raid is coordinated, or if some disgruntled member with nothing else to lose decides they want to take the New York market down with themselves.

It is a shame that this stigma exists. I frequently interact with Black tops who have really nice asses, and for some, whenever I ask about them bottoming, they reply that they can, but it’s stigmatized. I wish people didn’t have such a restricted conception of Black male sexuality.

Excellent idea. I support adding post tags to the existing 411 reviews on the site.

I personally favor the current "411 on (name) in (city)" system we have now. It is accessible (with some searching of course). Also, post wording as well as account novelty helps make it obvious who is a secret provider trying to manipulate their public record or not.

The concept of a client asking a provider to recruit another provider inherently seems weird to me. It seems in the above case, the client definitely wasn’t paying nor interested in a second provider simultaneously , and he made that clear, so the client isn’t in the wrong. I don’t understand clients who do expect providers to recruit a third guy for free. And even when paying for that second provider, it seems like it would be a risky thing unless that client contacted the second provider himself. I personally don’t trust too many providers, and it seems the first provider described in that review was out for himself. Reckless behavior. As a client, I always reach out to all parties personally whenever I want group fun in NYC. I would advise all providers to never accept any proposition from another provider, without speaking with the client himself. Period.

One can feel free to try to negotiate, but I disagree that it is common for someone to accept a lower price- being in NYC. Maybe you are in LA and it is different there (I have been to LA a couple times, and the good quality providers don’t go below $300-350)

LMAOOO I was already suspicious of the three posts before this latest one by “Docter”. Like, come on man, we get it 😂 😂 😂

In my experience: Sometimes, RM chat has a weird thing that clears out everything you’ve been previously typing. More importantly, lengthy convos are things that some time-wasters jack off to. Providers want to have signs that a paid meeting will occur, and that you are not taking advantage of their time for free. I see warnings in bios now too: providers are tired of being contacted by of scammers, free-jerkers, and time wasters on the site . Once you meet with them, they could indeed become more verbose.

If you’re referring to the fact that it’s oval-like and not spherical/ jutting out, yes.

It seems if you go to your history and clear the cache, messenger works again.

The best of the best in my opinion when I hired there is JacobLarsen

I sometimes hire to give oral- but it does astound me that some only are willing to receive if they have a condom on. The taste of rubber (and possibly lube... as some condoms come pre-lubed) is not my fancy

Lukemarco is an extraordinary kisser and passionate fucker. He also lists as an 8.5 guy, though in person it seems slightly bigger than that to me. I've also enjoyed the company of Stephen_Top!

My favorites at the moment: As echoed by @56harrisond https://rent.men/TopMediterranean Also love https://rent.men/LukeMarco https://rent.men/ScottVersHung

Did you try using the “and” feature? Searching for threads that include the words “nyc” and “hung”? You can also go to RM, look up providers and filter by size, then search if they are discussed here.

Yup- I have my favorites out of the many, and it’s best to inquire about those already reviewed on the company of men. I would also stick to those with a good number of ratings on RM.

Note that I agree that providers who happen to be on here should be treated with equal respect as clients are. I still think it would be a disaster for the veracity/trustworthiness of written reviews if providers were en masse, made aware of this site. I am not talking about people interacting as themselves/truthfully saying they are providers. (Thats a good thing). I fear a wave of users who claim to be clients when they really are providers who want to artificially manipulate their own reputations. It is not a waste of time to do such dishonest behavior, as someone insisted in this thread. Good PR is literally business boosting. Some bad actors may be strategic and not come off as “newbies”.

Good point. I suspect that there could be more strategic actors though, who might wait and act once their account ages enough to strike. In fact, in the case of some event where the provider community is mass-informed about this website, it would be great to mark accounts created after that point as “post-event” and accounts created before it as “pre-event”, sort of like a BC and AD thing lol, where we are more trusting of accounts created in the BC era.

I definitely am open to providers truthfully interacting as themselves on here, but if this website is made generally known to the provider community, you will inevitably see a huge set of accounts claiming to be clients when they are really providers dishonestly boosting their own reputations . This would make this website obsolete in my opinion.

It doesn’t seem to me a waste of time to create many different profiles. It seems like it takes under a minute to create an account. and the payoff of having multiple voices recommend you on here seems like it outweighs the cost of maybe 10 minutes of creating account/, verifying the emails, and then posting strategically over time. Lol, it seems very very profitable to go through the (short) time to create accounts and attract clients on here who would pay hundreds of dollars per meeting. I think fake good reviews would overwhelm fake bad reviews , but those fake good reviews would be harmful nonetheless. I advise against providers gaining general knowledge of this website.

LOL this is definitely a fake profile. I was able to see instantly that the images are of hungskater. Seems unlikely hungskater is supplementing what may be a huge salary from his OF (nearly 1 million followers on twitter) with private escorting. I do want hungskater to actually consider escorting though- I'd pay a huge fee to take his dick.

I am usually very pro provider on many topics. This one, however, is where I am a bit less so. I think it would be dangerous for the integrity of the website if many or most providers knew about it. With many providers knowing about this website, there would be huge incentives to pose as clients on here, falsely boost their own reputation, and even more egregiously, try to ruin the reputation of other providers who they compete with. The signal of a good review on here (and a bad review) would weaken significantly, because if most or all providers knew about this website, we wouldn’t be able to tell if a review is secretly a provider trying to boost his own reputation or hurt someone else’s reputation. Taken to an extreme, the primary function of this website (trustworthy reviews) would evaporate.

Very sorry that this befell you. This is an example of one of my red lines with deposits- I never give a deposit to someone who has no reviews.

Lol. It is stunning how many people see the tag PNP and conclude with certainty that the person who tagged it is a meth-head of some sort, when they could well be tagging it to suggest that they are ok with a client doing whatever drugs said client wants to do.

I don’t think it should be seen as a moral crime to either forget to update your age after a year has passed or to intentionally not update it after a year. It’s a years difference, and I think a reasonable difference to boost provider anonymity without severely distorting one’s true age.