Jump to content

Cretus

Members
  • Posts

    337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

1,809 profile views

Cretus's Achievements

  1. Seems risky. Hopefully contact information isn’t concentrated (ie, some mass group chat). A mass group chat of known sex workers seems very risky if somehow leaked to the wrong person, or if some raid is coordinated, or if some disgruntled member with nothing else to lose decides they want to take the New York market down with themselves.
  2. It is a shame that this stigma exists. I frequently interact with Black tops who have really nice asses, and for some, whenever I ask about them bottoming, they reply that they can, but it’s stigmatized. I wish people didn’t have such a restricted conception of Black male sexuality.
  3. Excellent idea. I support adding post tags to the existing 411 reviews on the site.
  4. I personally favor the current "411 on (name) in (city)" system we have now. It is accessible (with some searching of course). Also, post wording as well as account novelty helps make it obvious who is a secret provider trying to manipulate their public record or not.
  5. The concept of a client asking a provider to recruit another provider inherently seems weird to me. It seems in the above case, the client definitely wasn’t paying nor interested in a second provider simultaneously , and he made that clear, so the client isn’t in the wrong. I don’t understand clients who do expect providers to recruit a third guy for free. And even when paying for that second provider, it seems like it would be a risky thing unless that client contacted the second provider himself. I personally don’t trust too many providers, and it seems the first provider described in that review was out for himself. Reckless behavior. As a client, I always reach out to all parties personally whenever I want group fun in NYC. I would advise all providers to never accept any proposition from another provider, without speaking with the client himself. Period.
  6. One can feel free to try to negotiate, but I disagree that it is common for someone to accept a lower price- being in NYC. Maybe you are in LA and it is different there (I have been to LA a couple times, and the good quality providers don’t go below $300-350)
  7. Cretus

    411 LukasNYC

    LMAOOO I was already suspicious of the three posts before this latest one by “Docter”. Like, come on man, we get it 😂 😂 😂
  8. In my experience: Sometimes, RM chat has a weird thing that clears out everything you’ve been previously typing. More importantly, lengthy convos are things that some time-wasters jack off to. Providers want to have signs that a paid meeting will occur, and that you are not taking advantage of their time for free. I see warnings in bios now too: providers are tired of being contacted by of scammers, free-jerkers, and time wasters on the site . Once you meet with them, they could indeed become more verbose.
  9. If you’re referring to the fact that it’s oval-like and not spherical/ jutting out, yes.
  10. It seems if you go to your history and clear the cache, messenger works again.
  11. The best of the best in my opinion when I hired there is JacobLarsen
  12. I sometimes hire to give oral- but it does astound me that some only are willing to receive if they have a condom on. The taste of rubber (and possibly lube... as some condoms come pre-lubed) is not my fancy
  13. Lukemarco is an extraordinary kisser and passionate fucker. He also lists as an 8.5 guy, though in person it seems slightly bigger than that to me. I've also enjoyed the company of Stephen_Top!
  14. My favorites at the moment: As echoed by @56harrisond https://rent.men/TopMediterranean Also love https://rent.men/LukeMarco https://rent.men/ScottVersHung
  15. Did you try using the “and” feature? Searching for threads that include the words “nyc” and “hung”? You can also go to RM, look up providers and filter by size, then search if they are discussed here.
×
×
  • Create New...