Venite

https://rent.men/femogu This beautiful specimen travels to New Jersey!

There seems to be a thread on him.

A new thread specifically about providers who are good rimmers.

Http://rent.men/Adonicebrian Incredible ass. Only 2 reviews. I wonder if anyone here has seen him.

Seems this should be moved to a different section. My thoughts: Even if there were such people who were interested, a membership subscription on the advertising sites (such as rentmen) is not cheap. They would need to make that money back, and certainly charge. If you’re looking for free fun, Grindr or another place is your best bet. You may also want to message other clients and see if they would be interested in getting together with you.

I agree with @ThirdEye. Luke is exceptionally kind, aside from awesome in bed. I find that many escorts do not open up their private gallery unless they have some certainty that the person is not just fishing for pictures. I find that if I just request without writing a message to them, most providers decline my request. Seems like typical business.

This is quite an assertion. You are suggesting that the pool of faithful providers who request deposits (an unknown proportion of all escorts) is harming clients on net by requesting deposits, as they allegedly incentivize bad providers (another proportion of all escorts which is hard to precisely quantify) to request deposits too and run away with the money. This is like saying all the Italian pizza shops in a NYC should be shut down because some pizza shops are partially fronts for fentanyl-laced drug dealing operations. Imagine you, a client , live in the upper west side of Manhattan and you want a provider from Brooklyn to come and see you, and you have never met them/they have never met you. What reason would they have to trust that you wouldn’t cancel on them and lead them to make a wasted 50-minute trip to you (costs a train fare) and then another wasted 50-minute trip to get back to Brooklyn (nearly 2 hours of time wasted along with transportation money)? A world where deposits don’t exist is an unrealistic world, because if providers somehow could not ask for deposits, a lot of providers would not bother accepting booking requests. I suspect that some bottoms (who prepare considerably to have sex and may even change their diets for a booking) would simply not want to work if they couldn’t charge a deposit assuring their cleaning efforts, struggles, scheduling, transportation, and fees wouldn’t go to waste because of a flaky client. It should also not be forgotten that providers themselves are targets of scammers, and deposits help weed those attackers out.

I have been surprised by a provider who I assumed was a strict top. His ass is amazing and well, let’s just say I was able to monetarily encourage him to go clean up so I could, as the kids say today, “clap those cheeks”. I never assume providers stated positional preferences are 100% true.

I echo @Delter here. Luke is my favorite top on the east coast at the moment, and I’ve had some amazing threesomes with him and other guys. I don’t think he does deposits unless you are very far away from him. I host in midtown and he never asked for deposits. You’re probably outside Manhattan or something. Even in that case that you are far from him, he might just ask you to uber or Lyft him to you instead of a deposit. I remember a time when I had a hotel in Brooklyn and he asked me to either uber him from Manhattan to Brooklyn or pay a deposit, which I paid. Other than that, I don’t think he does deposits.

A negative review of an individual is different from a recommendation against automatically believing the reviews made on this website.

This seems especially odd and silly on the part of the provider- to wreck a mutually beneficial engagement like this is to lose money. He also may be testing your tolerance of this. Do not go back to him ever. I of course disagree with the “no deposits ever” recommendation.

Of course this is true. It would be outrageous to see anyone disputing these intuitive and understandable points. This set of assertions is substantively different from the grave claim that “U=U is false”.

“HIV can multiply during a lapse in treatment”- in other words, after a lapse in treatment, they may be *not* undetectable. This does not seem like it is a rebuttal of U=U. The drug resistance point you mention also seems to suggest that when drugs don’t work, the person wouldn’t truly be undetectable. Again, that is a well known point, and doesn’t counter the idea that being truly undetectable means untransmittable.

Don’t forget the serendipitous paintings!

I’m sure American residents who planned trips for a vacation are disappointed. It is imperative that well wishes and goodwill be mostly focused on people who must reside in these areas under the informal rule of cartels. The brutality of those cartels is unspeakable. Like, child ******* and ****** unspeakable. I was disturbed greatly by a story I heard this morning. I hope cjng can be wiped off of the face of the earth. Edit: I know this may break the rules of this lounge (no politics/war) but it just seems like an important note to add to the discussion.