soloyo215

First, sorry that you have such judgemental friend. Quite hypocritical since the fact that he found you means that he was looking. That attests to what he thinks of providers in general. Second, you should know that you can search in RM without having an account, so you are findable in RM by the general public. I have the feeling that this might open a flood of information door in your circle, so be prepared. Actually, have you prepared for the possibility of this happening? I hope so. If not, there's a high chance that by now rumors have started. I hope you know how to handle it. Best.

With the way the talk about "boomers" and with their attitude, of course, no one wants to talk, I mean, text them.

No, unless you are meeting for illegal purposes, such as hiring a hitman, deal illegal drugs, or incur into any illegal activity. Meet in a public place, so that way you know that you are not going into some kind of trap in somebody's turf.

Sleeping. I can do that every night for hours on end.

The way I see this whole thing is more from a larger perspective, which means that regardless of what platform we use, there will always be risk involved, financial risk, personal safety risk and health risk. All we can do is minimize it to the best of our knowledge and abilities. More reliable sites like RM have had a few bad apples, causing bad experiences to some clients. It's a matter of what level of risk we are comfortable with. I agree that some sites are safer than others. STG looks terrible and not that professionally organized (not to mention that it doesn't look like the administration monitors what people post). This is not a recognized profession, leave alone protected or regulated. Caution and precautions are key at all times.

Not the best sit, and YIKES! in my city too.

Hey, I answered and sent you my answers by message. Best.

Why? I don't see anything wrong with it. Hope you had fun.

Not me. Trust me, you don't want to see it.

Size queens play an important role, especially in today's society (some ancient societies associated men with big dicks with negative things). Men with large penises will otherwise be feeling sad and lonely. To power bottom size queens.

A while back I did post about the background music (here), but it was about the music being interrupted by loud insurance commercials or some kind of public announcement. As a client, you do have a saying over the type of music you prefer to relax if the current music doesn't do it for you. You can ask, and I believe that they are more than happy to accommodate. With an escort I see no problem inquiring about background music if any, I also had a terrible experience with a "masseur" who was not very professional (or knowledgeable), who had the Steven Wilkos show in the background instead of music, among other things. Other than that, I am fairly easygoing with whatever background music is in the background, but I do know of people who react to certain types of music negatively. I see no problem in asking when booking the appointment.

You can increase your chances if you look at masseurs who are also in escort websites. I you are interested in the massage portion too, first identify the masseur that is also in the escort website, not escorts who have "erotic massage" added to their profile (9 times out of 10, that's self-marketing nonsense). That said, I've had three masseurs who seem willing to get rimmed (I neither confirm nor deny having rimmed the hell out of all three), so they seem to be around. It might be a matter of inquiring and also the way you inquire.

I don't mean to be mean, but it starts to sound like you might be the one who doesn't belong there, then. And yes, if you go there for the eye candy, you are going going for the wrong reasons. That's not what nudism is for.

I have seen some escorts using the "I'm straight" bullshit as means to appeal to those who are willing to pay (a lot) more for having them become "gay for pay". There might be some legitimately hetero escorts, but for what I know, they may not advertise that much, or advertise using different means, especially considering how women operate, think and act. Personally, I come from a place where I used to call myself "heterophobic", so no, I have never cared much for guys who call themselves straight, and it's never been my place to try to prove them right or wrong. I just let them be. There's absolutely nothing wrong with perfectly fine gay and biusexual men (and FTMs for those who like them), so there's plenty to choose out there for me to bother pursuing a person who, by the very definition of who they are, doesn't have any interest in me.

I got curious and looked. Seems like their british site is a little more geographically accurate than their USA site. To me that means that it's fairly new in USA, hence you get the same results regardless of the state that you choose. I also agree that a site that doesn't control the browsers by having them create accounts is not necessarily too reliable, as it is prone to all kinds of outside attacks.

I'va always been very protective of my emotions, especially when it comes to romance. I learned a lesson about that way back when I was a young man. Losing my self-esteem over pursuing a person who has o interest in me that way, but was capitalizing on my interest in him, that was not a great experience. However, it was a learning experience. Took me some time to understand that that's only certain type of men, and not all of us are opportunists. However, in my case it wasn't a for-pay situation. I volunteered helping him with way too many things without any thank you. It did not feel good at all, even if I was a good influence to him (that now he pretends never happened). Hiring is something that, though I can trace to way back when (longer than what I thought), I never went with the mindset of connecting with the guy at an intimate level, at least not in the sense that will interest me in connecting with him outside of a client-provider relationship. I've been married for some time now, but even back when I wasn't I was always conscious that the possibility of developing a relationship with a person who I meet in this setting is remote. My suggestion: Protect yourself. Protect your mental well-being, your self esteem and your wallet. High chances are that you might hurt yourself and qwound up broke, feeling like shit, and angry at both the provider and yourself. That can escalate into something darker. It has in come cases.

Well, maybe you are going either (a) to the wrong beaches, or (b) for the wrong reasons. That is not to mention what you see in non-nudist places are not exactly eye candy either. So I don't see the point in stating that you don't like a percentage of what you see in a nudist place, as if people you don't like seeing don't exist anywhere else. That is, unless you are equating nudism with sexual attraction to people, or a nudist place with a cruising area, which are both the wrong premises.

A lot. A lot. No.

Never tried Instagram, but you can connect it to Messenger. In messenger, the rules are more relaxed, so you might be able to reach out to that person (if he's in Messenger too, of course). That's all I can think of.

Nothing really glamourous or charming. My story of my first hire involves admitting now that I have been hiring for quite some time, dating back to the 90s. Back then I didn't know it as "hiring", but I'm not sure what was my line of reasoning. I used to hang out at a cruising area downtown my town. I made good friends there. I was young, not dumb, but full of cum. As such, there were men who offered me money to get in their cars, which I rejected (and I made some of them feel like shit for offering me money, as if doing it for free was some kind of badge of honor). Then one day I found myself cruising and hooked up with this guy who looked hot. We had sex in my car, and then he asked me for "money for a haricut and to help my mom". I gave him money, but I didn't see that as a "hire". Later talking to my friends in the cruising area, I learned that he was a street hustler. Later I did get together with one or two of those men that I saw around that area, more knowingly about that there will be money involved. The end.

The issue with that is who is supposed to determine that, and how, exactly? What is exactly what makes people "not allowed to be seeing" nude? Personally I accept that not everything that I see in this world is going to be to my liking, but I don't think that I am in the position of questioning the existence or rights to do/be of whoever I don't like. I have been to nude beaches and I have no problem with people who I don't find attractive being there having fun. I just mind my own business. What should it be my business to advocate for not allowing them in the place? I also know that I'm noe exactly great to look at by some people, while others cannot get their eyes off me. So should they a "I like to look at these people only" section, based on one person't particular taste and idea of what nudism is supposed to be? How will that work? In fact, isn't nudism promoting the exact opposite of discrimintaing on the bases of what some people find adequate to look at? That is, not to mention that nudism does not equate sex. Just my thoughts.

Maybe because Gay Pride (now "Pride") has become a Disney parade and we are now an afterthough?

I'm not a provider, so I am not going to comment on anything regarding their side of the event. I have had excellent experiences with providers and non-providers, where I didn't cum and I was perfectly fine with it. Of course, the climax part is good, but not necessary. I don't think I care much for the provider coming. Just my reality

Trust your inctinct. If it doesn't feel right, don't do it. There are some escorts who offer the "boyfriend experience", which I've never personally have had, so I am not going to comment on what that feels. However, based on what I have heard from others, seems like to some escorts, that situation is exactly what the boyfriend experience is supposed to be. To others is more intimate, meaning that the escort treats the client as his boyfriend in an intimate, not social, setting. My only concern is that I find hard to believe that the request is going to be a one-time thing. High chances are that lies have to be maintained, especially those presented in social settings where people are constrantly judging and inquiring. That might mean that, though on your end that might become a good cash cow, it will also mean getting sucked into somebody's deceitful social practices, which might involve escalation of what he might expect of you as his "date/boyfriend". On the client end, I have witnessed clients getting sucked into that boyfriend fantasy to the point that they have themselves and a lot of money, not ending well for either party. You (or your financial needs) decide your level of comfort with that, and you decide if that works for you short and long term. Based on how you seem to be doing, seems like you can afford the luxury of choosing your clients. Be well, and welcome back.

I see that it's in the best interest of both to have flexibility within reason, especially due to last-minute unforeseen events. Sometimes one of the parties can't be flexible, but when it's possible, I have no problem rescheduling or seeing the provider at a later time. I figure that forcing the provider to be on time when he has an emergency will harm the overall experience. Again, within reason, and what that means is up to each person to define. If it's a habitual thing, then it's a problem. However, I think that there shouldn't be any difference between any of the parties. The provider risks losing money, so I imagine if he has to cancel for a legitimate reason (not because he can book a more expensive client at that time), then it's reasonable to understand that things can happen that can affect the schedule.